Well, sure, if that's how you want to define "atheistic scientists" and "non-atheistic scientists." This the layout of your argument: 1. If a scientis...
The difference between the GCB and the island is that the GCB is not finitely bound while the island, by definition, must remain finite. So it isn't t...
Such blatant straw men are unnecessary. There are outliers to almost every group, and feminist philosophy is no exception. So I have no interest in de...
I'd like to argue against your conclusion by denying this premise. Here's my counterargument: 1. God is omnibenevolent. 2. It is better for people to ...
To your rebuttal of premise 3: your attention shifts because your attention is limited. Your states of being change because you are mutable. The GCB w...
I'm only using references to time-- "when," "before," etc.-- because we are temporal beings who cannot think outside of events in relation to time. Pe...
If you're granting that the appearance of fine-tuning in this world makes it possible that a Creator exists, then, and if you equate that Creator with...
Your response to premise 1 misinterprets Yajur’s original claim: He is not stating that the good does truly not outweigh the bad, only that we often l...
Let's say that you're talking to one of your best friends, and as they're talking, you realize that they are about to say one of their common catchphr...
God’s presence is not as one-dimensional as the presence of finite material beings. Biblically, there is a difference between God’s fully glorified pr...
I'd like to reply to your first premise, "If God is all-loving, he would not have created hell." In objecting to this conditional, I first want to def...
Comments