You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

SophistiCat

Comments

Oh hey! I didn't realize that you have joined this form. You've been missed :)
February 26, 2020 at 16:12
I agree, and I think that this is an underappreciated point. Note that relativity is compatible with absolute simultaneity as well* - it just doesn't ...
February 26, 2020 at 16:06
So, taking your "proof" to its logical conclusion, if you could encode all the information in the universe with a digital dataset - that is to say, a ...
February 26, 2020 at 15:44
When you put a provocative question in the title of the thread, most people are just going to respond to the title without bothering to read further. ...
February 25, 2020 at 22:04
As always, it's impossible to tell when someone claims to represent opponents' arguments made elsewhere, whether they are doing it accurately. Anyway,...
February 25, 2020 at 21:47
I love SEP, and I certainly wouldn't mind more of a good thing, but is it really a model for what Internet ought to be? It is a pretty small step from...
February 25, 2020 at 09:07
This also brings up another relevant question: does the coordinate time of a mathematical model (in this case the theory of relativity), physical time...
February 25, 2020 at 07:44
We get a sense that some theoretical entity is more than a mathematical contrivance if it does not go away when we change the model, i.e. if we find i...
February 23, 2020 at 07:38
You seem to agree that we must of necessity occupy some very special place in the universe (a habitable place in a universe that is nearly everywhere ...
February 22, 2020 at 17:34
Yes, that is a question that is often glossed over. Scientists in particular often implicitly assume the stance of scientific realism when talking abo...
February 22, 2020 at 16:28
No, relativity does not assume any of the questions that are at issue, such as whether the present is in some sense more "real" than the past or the f...
February 22, 2020 at 16:12
You have to be careful when you say "different times," unless they are all on the same worldline, which is not the case here. From what I gather (and ...
February 22, 2020 at 10:50
February 22, 2020 at 10:49
Our habitable conditions may be "average" in some sense, but certainly not with respect to their habitability! Your framing of the problem is absurd: ...
February 22, 2020 at 10:08
That's the official line. Was that a Chinese documentary that you watched?
February 16, 2020 at 18:31
In order to talk about "balancing" moral actions, you need to somehow quantify the moral weight, or worth of actions, to be able to compare, add and s...
February 16, 2020 at 17:25
You have a tendency of taking words out of context and using them inappropriately. Stop that. Your comment, while expressing an agreement, has nothing...
February 16, 2020 at 14:44
That may not have been your intention, but that is what it amounts to. Even if you say that this moral arithmetic is loose, it still has the approxima...
February 16, 2020 at 13:59
Time travel is nothing more nor less than waiting. You are perhaps led astray by conventional word associations: waiting feels passive, while travelin...
February 16, 2020 at 08:51
That's a problematic reasoning. You can by the same token reduce everything to "animalistic features" - we are animals, after all; we are also physica...
February 16, 2020 at 07:18
This assumes a scalar metric of moral action that accumulates and follows the usual arithmetic rules. Why assume that?
February 16, 2020 at 07:07
Well, your point, as in the point of this thread, is rather elusive. But as to a more specific point that I was addressing, it is simply wrong. It is ...
February 15, 2020 at 18:21
I think I am getting a handle on this confusing bit that recurs in your posts. The problem here is even more basic than tensed predicates. You cannot ...
February 15, 2020 at 16:07
If Hawking and Smolin subscribe to eternalism, and I don't know if they do, that is on them and not on GR. GR has nothing to say on the question of ex...
February 15, 2020 at 08:05
GR does not imply this. You are thinking of eternalism, which is a metaphysical view. GR does not imply it any more than Newtonian mechanics does. GR ...
February 14, 2020 at 14:53
I think this is the clearest statement of your thesis (excluding the odd bit about "as if it never was," which is what I picked up on initially, but I...
February 14, 2020 at 14:38
But of course, that is one of the ideas that is lurking in the background: the unearned privilege of the upper classes. You don't need this to be spee...
February 12, 2020 at 08:41
Rather than Sam Harris (who, to be honest, isn't much of a philosopher), I would recommend Daniel Dennett as an eloquent proponent of an "illusionist"...
February 10, 2020 at 17:40
I still don't understand what you are trying to get at here. Granted, one can only predicate things about something or someone that exists. But what d...
February 10, 2020 at 13:38
Everything is either fascist or potentially fascist, if you play fast and loose with words and entertain far-fetched scenarios. Dogs are fascist. Ice ...
February 10, 2020 at 12:07
Yeah, slippery slope-type arguments are dumb.
February 10, 2020 at 09:10
You may have read an arXiv preprint. Ladyman also cites an earlier date for the Mathematical Universe paper, following its arXiv entry.
February 10, 2020 at 07:44
At a guess, there are probably even fewer philosophers who accept MUH (which Tegmark himself readily acknowledges), and Tegmark is probably its only c...
February 10, 2020 at 07:40
Here you go: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?&cites=6942634181980308378 These are the Google Scholar cites for his original paper The Mathematical ...
February 10, 2020 at 07:19
Really? Someone being wrong on the Internet forces you to respond, even though you realize all along that you are being silly? That's pretty sad, not ...
February 10, 2020 at 06:55
I think you are conflating two different senses of counterfactual: 1. (adjective) Relating to or expressing what has not happened or is not the case 2...
February 08, 2020 at 08:12
Are you sure it was "Contemporary Philosophy"? Newton and Leibniz aren't exactly contemporary...
February 05, 2020 at 17:36
Yikes. I don't think I can stomach any more of this. Is there an English translation?
February 03, 2020 at 21:06
Interestingly, that same method of inscribing or circumscribing polygons was used to prove some results in my integral calculus class. So there is a l...
February 03, 2020 at 08:26
That's an odd claim. I don't know much about the history of mathematics, but even I have heard of Alexandrian mathematicians who thrived well into the...
February 01, 2020 at 20:14
I'm not a physicist, I just play one on TV :) (Undergrad degree several decades old.) But what mess do you need untangled? Not the mess in MU's head, ...
February 01, 2020 at 15:35
There exists a relatively non-weird take on backward causation: Laws of physics are time-reversible; if you are physicalist who believes that physics ...
January 30, 2020 at 12:11
You are reading more into what @"fdrake" proposed than there is. He didn't say anything about numbers constituting a line; on the contrary, he was goi...
January 29, 2020 at 17:06
You are right: this isn't even cranky, this is just stupid. But I didn't say that only a crank could defend the idea that waves and fields require a m...
January 26, 2020 at 21:36
Found this paper, gives some historical perspective on the issue:
January 26, 2020 at 10:17
To me it seems like a quaint prejudice to insist that anything that is wave-like requires a medium. Maybe there is something to the idea; I wish there...
January 26, 2020 at 08:34
Are you vandalizing Wikipedia now? Seriously, unless you are very knowledgeable about the subject (which, no offense, you are not), don't touch anythi...
January 25, 2020 at 20:34
Oh, I don't mean anything different than what you mean: a particular kind of object in the world, an entity that, using certain diagnostic criteria, c...
January 25, 2020 at 12:23
Sorry to be abrupt, but it's not like you are breaking new ground here. Origin of life research has been under way for close to a century, and there a...
January 25, 2020 at 12:06
This rather demonstrates a poor understanding of natural sciences. And that in turn underlines the point that I made earlier: before you can understan...
January 24, 2020 at 15:18