You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Terrapin Station

Comments

Why wouldn't having or possessing data be knowing it by acquaintance? How would you have or possess data without knowing it by acquaintaice? I don't a...
August 05, 2019 at 17:33
No. I'm not talking about making distinctions. When I mention "just the tree" for example, I'm not implying thinking of the term "tree" or a concept o...
August 05, 2019 at 17:28
This is going to be a mess for us to sort through, so one thing at a time, and hopefully we won't have to rehash any of this. I believe both of those ...
August 05, 2019 at 17:23
This is getting to the questions. I hate going on and on though, so I want to figure out why we're doing that. So we don't disagree on whether the wor...
August 05, 2019 at 13:30
Reading over that section, it's a major hurdle for me that you seem to be talking about "intelligibililty" (I'm not even a fan of that word, really, b...
August 05, 2019 at 13:28
You'd have to make the difference clear. ? That's just introducing more confusion. Now we'd need to get into the ontology of possibility, too. Okay, I...
August 05, 2019 at 13:24
Again, there's a difference between what's present for one phenomenally and what's really the case ontologically. Of course there's a reference point ...
August 05, 2019 at 13:22
On the occasions in question, no. Not phenomenally.
August 05, 2019 at 13:10
If you can't observe the world, how would you observe what other people say to know what the consensus is?
August 05, 2019 at 13:02
It's clearly not what I mean by that phrase. Otherwise it wouldn't have made sense that I was apparently making a distinction, right?
August 05, 2019 at 12:41
Right, so I say so, because concepts ARE something that you construct personally. If you don't agree with this, then we disagree on what concepts are ...
August 05, 2019 at 12:39
We don't just do that arbitrarily. We do it because we observe the world to be different than how longwe thought it was. Re that other comment, again,...
August 05, 2019 at 12:11
There are no normative value facts. How do you not understand this yet?
August 05, 2019 at 11:19
The etymology of "metaphysics," by the way, is simply that it was an untitled book placed after the book entitled "Physics" in Aristotle anthologies (...
August 05, 2019 at 11:16
In my experience in school, science and mathematics contexts often had no time for philosophy because a common approach was to simply not care about t...
August 05, 2019 at 11:10
It's not immoral in my view. No consensual actions are immoral. We just need to make sure that assisted suicides are occurring consensually, so there ...
August 05, 2019 at 11:04
It's not determined by minds, but by what the world is like. We couldn't just decide to assert that P, where P would then be the case. No one is sayin...
August 05, 2019 at 10:58
That's the sort of weird, anxious/neurotic dialogue I imagine most antinatalists going through frequently. Maybe try just try chilling out, not worryi...
August 04, 2019 at 22:42
The past is changes/motion that happened but that are no longer happening per some frame of reference. The future will be changes/motion that haven't ...
August 04, 2019 at 18:26
So, we just went over this a handful of posts ago. Here's what we said: ======================================================== Not per a decision. P...
August 04, 2019 at 18:22
Re optical illusions like that, that's really what something partially submerged in water looks like from a particular reference point. You're getting...
August 04, 2019 at 18:06
So first, hallucinations and illusions are real hallucinations and illusions. (Where we're not using "real" in the traditional manner to refer to some...
August 04, 2019 at 14:56
If you're positing that stuff exists that's separate from your mind, and that isn't just others' minds, you're a realist.
August 04, 2019 at 14:52
The simple answer is that in order to have the belief that reality can NOT be directly perceived (insofar as its perceived, re what's perceived, etc.-...
August 04, 2019 at 14:32
So we don't agree on what concepts are or how they work. Also, I haven't the faintest what "find them latent in my sensory representation" or "actuali...
August 04, 2019 at 14:26
Do you think that I'm denying theoretical knowledge for some reason?
August 04, 2019 at 00:30
Again, my view is that perception gives you things in themselves at particular reference points and everything is always relative to some reference po...
August 03, 2019 at 23:54
Sure. So first, I'm confirming that you're saying that a chair doesn't really look like a chair from a frame of reference that's however many inches o...
August 03, 2019 at 23:45
I asked you "How would you know that you've perceived something other than it is? Could you give an example?" And then I wondered if the chair was you...
August 03, 2019 at 23:41
Was that your example? So a chair doesn't really look like a chair from a frame of reference that's however many inches or feet away from it and that ...
August 03, 2019 at 23:37
How would you know that you've perceived something other than it is? Could you give an example?
August 03, 2019 at 23:31
I didn't hear about the garlic festival shooting. Was the perp a vampire?
August 03, 2019 at 23:26
Nice move basically doing this: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-3mu6Sl8CLVw/T-CNlwHSMrI/AAAAAAAAA0M/AB9qExUtQzQ/s1600/I%27mRubber.jpg
August 03, 2019 at 23:21
It gives you the things in themselves at particular reference points and everything is always relative to some reference point or other, with there be...
August 03, 2019 at 23:19
To us, no. Again, it just depends on how faculties evolved for the creatures in question. That usually has a lot to do with what's survivally advantag...
August 03, 2019 at 22:59
Can it be considered without that? No. Because of what it refers to to consider something.
August 03, 2019 at 22:52
Depends on the activity, on the occasion.
August 03, 2019 at 22:51
Visible light is a type of electromagnetic radiation. We can detect doppler-shifted electromagnetic radiation at relatively slow speeds.
August 03, 2019 at 22:48
Yes, spatio-temporal locations. You can't consider anything absent a spatio-temporal location, and all property changes occur relative to spatio-tempo...
August 03, 2019 at 22:47
You asked how fast they'd need to be moving in order to detect doppler-shifted light. The answer is not very fast. We can detect doppler-shifted elect...
August 03, 2019 at 22:45
?
August 03, 2019 at 22:42
You're it aware that visible light is part of the electromagnetic spectrum? Microwaves would be visible light to creatures that evolved sensitivities ...
August 03, 2019 at 22:41
How would you think that the properties of an orange (or anything else) don't change? You wouldn't be able to have orange trees flowering, some of the...
August 03, 2019 at 22:40
Not very fast. Radar guns work via doppler effect measurement, for example. Radar guns use microwaves, but it's all just part of the electromagnetic s...
August 03, 2019 at 22:34
It's not that the orange is emitting light. It's reflecting it. Reflected light is doppler-shifted just as well as emitted light. You could say that i...
August 03, 2019 at 22:27
You asked "Put forth a duration." I explained what time is: The changes/motion that are happening. A duration would a measurement of the changes that ...
August 03, 2019 at 19:54
I'd agree that maybe not all properties change at different reference points, but I definitely wouldn't say that color and texture are among them. Col...
August 03, 2019 at 19:46
Right, it just seems like a very odd thing to think. I was reviewing his motivations for arriving at his view a bit, and they seem like really poor re...
August 03, 2019 at 19:42
I'd say that space and time are inherent in the physical world, which is everything that exists, including your mind. It's been so long since I read K...
August 03, 2019 at 18:18
Relations
August 03, 2019 at 18:00