You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Terrapin Station

Comments

It's not anything like mental content when unconscious. Hence there isn't unconscious mental content. Mental content is phenomena such as thoughts, de...
November 04, 2019 at 23:24
You can suddenly have a memory. There is nothing like a memory, with the same qualities that you're aware of when you're aware of a memory, that's pre...
November 04, 2019 at 23:18
I asked a question about the scenario as you presented it and asked for the justification for characterizing it that way.
November 04, 2019 at 23:12
??? What gives you that impression exactly? The bit you're quoting? That's a characterization of the belief that I'm saying has no justification.
November 04, 2019 at 21:58
An appropriately crank-like response. ;-)
November 04, 2019 at 21:27
So why would it be noteworthy that people you're making up share the model you're making up? It's more curious that some people you're making up--like...
November 04, 2019 at 17:55
A high percentage of new members who actually post something seem to be cranks. Most of the long-term regulars can be really dickish and annoying, exa...
November 04, 2019 at 17:53
Your "interlocutors" are part of your model, no?
November 04, 2019 at 17:20
I'm getting at the fact that Isaac believes that things like primates and qualities they have are a mental model of his own devising. If he's going to...
November 04, 2019 at 16:38
"Sacred" is usually a religious idea. If you think that anything is sacred, you believe that a god exists. So someone who thinks that life is sacred (...
November 04, 2019 at 14:36
You mean that you have a model where there are non-linguistic primates and they have a sense of fairness, but it's strictly something you've construct...
November 04, 2019 at 14:18
What would be the reason to believe that prior to it "blipping into your consciousness," it exists as the memory--with just the same qualities it has ...
November 04, 2019 at 13:39
The irony here is amusing.
November 04, 2019 at 00:38
So then why, when I said, "I don't buy unconscious mental content, by the way," did you quote that and start responding to it instead of arguing about...
November 04, 2019 at 00:22
So is the reason you accept it just because many people accept it?
November 04, 2019 at 00:09
I don't know what's difficult to understand about me asking YOU what YOU accept as plausible evidence of unconscious mental content, but apparently it...
November 03, 2019 at 23:11
So if you don't actually know any empirical support for it that you accept, it's probably worth examining why you believe in it so firmly.
November 03, 2019 at 20:52
Yeah, definitely. You know I'm against any speech laws.
November 03, 2019 at 15:58
Yeah, I agree with this. At that, I don't have any problem with the idea of someone being transgender, but I have no problem with the idea of someone ...
November 03, 2019 at 13:51
Are you going to tell me what you accept as plausible evidence of unconscious mental content?
November 03, 2019 at 12:24
Which again is a claim that I don't at all agree with. I said that from the start. What do you accept as plausible evidence of it?
November 02, 2019 at 21:12
Different people will have different assessments about that. ¯\_(?)_/¯
November 02, 2019 at 21:10
I wasn't asking you to rephrase your claim. I was asking you to justify it epistemically.
November 02, 2019 at 21:09
Democrats need to worry about running someone who can beat Trump, and they should have more or less have figured this out by now, as the election is o...
November 02, 2019 at 20:52
I don't hold everyone to the same standards, no. I adjust my expectations and assessments based on capabilities, history, context and so on.
November 02, 2019 at 20:41
And the way you know that is? Right, so when I say there's no set criteria for it, really, that's what I mean. So no. And I don't necessarily show kin...
November 02, 2019 at 19:27
Um, you asked me what kind of kindess I value. There's not really any set criteria for the kindness I value. On what grounds can you say that it's not...
November 02, 2019 at 19:21
There's not some set of criteria for it, really. It's just whatever I feel is warranted.
November 02, 2019 at 18:57
Not to the extent that one thinks that it involves catering to something just because someone wants you to, no.
November 02, 2019 at 16:18
I don't agree with the theory of forms, but there's a simple reason that the third man argument doesn't work: the property of "good" is itself good, o...
October 31, 2019 at 23:31
For example: " Something can explain the goodness of a particular thing if and only if the thing explaining the goodness has an understanding of "the ...
October 31, 2019 at 22:46
Probably most people would put it in their garden, or on a shelf or something like that. (I'm not sure what we're getting at here.)
October 31, 2019 at 22:05
I'm stumped why you're talking about explaining and understanding in the context of the theory of forms and the third man argument.
October 31, 2019 at 21:41
What about that? So, say, for example, that one sees a rock that one is really attracted to--say something like a rock of pink granite, so one picks i...
October 31, 2019 at 21:16
Necessary in the sense that it doesn't make sense to say that there's something with no properties/characteristics. And observing those doesn't imply ...
October 31, 2019 at 20:46
No, they're not. "Compares to the effect they have on him"? What would that even mean?
October 31, 2019 at 20:31
Not "like" as a comparison. "Like" as in characteristics/properties/qualities.
October 31, 2019 at 18:43
You're not talking about empirical data. You don't believe you have access to empirical data. You're talking about a model that you constructed (just ...
October 31, 2019 at 18:42
I don't really understand "makes explicit I wish to know of." Observation shows you what things are like, properties they have, patterns that occur, e...
October 31, 2019 at 17:04
As when deciding to go with "minimizing variance" for a metric.
October 31, 2019 at 17:00
Yes. Observe it.
October 31, 2019 at 14:17
Whether that's the case or not (that it's really minimizing variance with respect to other models), it would be arbitrary that you're going with "mini...
October 31, 2019 at 14:15
Not that I can think of offhand. I don't know you that well yet. I'm thinking of other people I've interacted with a lot here. I gave an example earli...
October 30, 2019 at 18:43
Also, if you're going to go back to the "everything is a model" lie then again, we'd need to explain why you went with one model over the other. You d...
October 30, 2019 at 18:23
It's not a matter of that. It's a matter of people claiming silly things that they don't actually believe.
October 30, 2019 at 18:21
There's absolutely no grounds on that for calling something an illusion, though. It's completely arbitrary (and ridiculous, and not something that you...
October 30, 2019 at 18:20
This was the part I was talking about: "The notion of optical illusions is incoherent if we don't know what's really there contra the illusion." "The ...
October 30, 2019 at 15:45
No, the changes that are happening from some frame of reference are not an abstraction. I don't know why you think I'm forwarding an argument. I'm sim...
October 30, 2019 at 15:22
That mathematical view of time is just an abstraction. Time is simply motion or change. T1 is the changes or motion that are/is happening from some fr...
October 30, 2019 at 14:51
Again, for me, most things are perfect, and when I think they're not, I tend to think that I need to adjust my ideas. I'm not someone who usually care...
October 30, 2019 at 14:39