You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Terrapin Station

Comments

The reason it's subjective is because it's a mental phenomenon, and the reason it's inaccessible is that the mental phenomenon is not identical to any...
November 06, 2019 at 17:29
Atheism is about one thing and one thing only, though: whether a god exists. So when someone claims that one does, and you think it doesn't--and espec...
November 06, 2019 at 17:23
This is the water that I'm trying to lead you, a horse, to. They didn't just pick any random philosopher, and there's a reason that the first section ...
November 06, 2019 at 17:19
What the hell are you talking about? The idea is clearly about someone feeling some way at an earlier time, where there was no behavioral clue that th...
November 06, 2019 at 17:16
Well, there would be no need of it without theism, sure. But when someone says, "Blah blah blah is the case" and you're aware of that, and you think t...
November 06, 2019 at 17:13
Why wouldn't Hume be? A lot of Kant's work was in response to Hume, after all.
November 06, 2019 at 17:10
Holy moley. So why, in your view, was the entire first section of that continental philosophy companion about Kant/"The Kantian Legacy"? They just wan...
November 06, 2019 at 17:01
Right. I figured as much. I joke around a lot normally. But try to just not worry about it. I'm more interested in your response to the other thread (...
November 06, 2019 at 16:57
That particularly seems odd to say. Imagine that we take this table: https://b451c108ef7ce3b912eb-75c7695d67180639ae25fac6b37d4ead.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com...
November 06, 2019 at 16:55
Holy moley. Just take a breath and relax. Didn't you write this not too long ago? "Does anyone else feel like a fair number of individuals on this sit...
November 06, 2019 at 16:29
Would you agree with Wikipedia's characterization of pragmatic ethics? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatic_ethics
November 06, 2019 at 16:24
It was a joke. I said that people tend to ignore or be pissy about status/achievement claims, and then you endorsed that "they should be." (I know you...
November 06, 2019 at 16:17
I enjoy life/living. It's not pathetic in my opinion. And I like what I do for work . . . plus I don't t have to do it continuously. Do I have the fre...
November 06, 2019 at 16:15
I don't think that people should be pissy about it. ;-) Part of what I left out in quoting myself was that I think the background of the reactions is ...
November 06, 2019 at 16:08
??? Positive atheism is simply the belief that something--namely a god--doesn't exist. So it's no different than you saying "If something doesn't exis...
November 06, 2019 at 16:05
I didn't see this reply until now. First, "pure moral truth" wouldn't imply objectivism necessarily, either. At any rate, can you explain how in your ...
November 06, 2019 at 16:01
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2h4PhgobI8
November 06, 2019 at 15:57
You're saying that somehow you had free will prior to your existence?
November 06, 2019 at 15:53
You can't use words correctly or incorrectly. If you're asking how do you know that you're using the word the "same way" as someone else (where we're ...
November 06, 2019 at 15:43
Read that section of the Blackwell Companion that I referred to.
November 06, 2019 at 15:33
If it's just a matter of getting the categorization straight, I'd concentrate on showing the alien differences between humans and other species, espec...
November 06, 2019 at 15:31
Yeah, as I wrote earlier: "People have a tendency online, especially in anonymous contexts, to be skeptical of any claims of achievement or status . ....
November 06, 2019 at 15:24
So one way to know what "run" refers to is to use a dictionary; "Run," in one sense of the term, refers to "moving at a speed faster than a walk, whil...
November 06, 2019 at 14:47
Kant is considered the start of the division a la being the first continental-style philosopher, where other continental philosophy carried on in his ...
November 05, 2019 at 23:24
Verbs do not refer to anything in your view? (What did I say earlier about this being like interacting with children who are trying to find creative w...
November 05, 2019 at 23:17
There's no way to map third-person observable data to first-person subjective data to make a statement to the effect of "there is no area that could e...
November 05, 2019 at 22:50
Kant is commonly considered the start of the division. Here's a practical example reflecting that: see the first section of this anthology-- https://w...
November 05, 2019 at 22:42
It's weak to say that a property of nonphysicals, akin to a property like location for molecules, is that you "notice" them (at least when they're tho...
November 05, 2019 at 22:13
It's the same way that you've noticed a thought. Atoms are present to mind--when you think about them, for example, right?
November 05, 2019 at 21:51
What does "explain" refer to here then?
November 05, 2019 at 21:40
Again, how do you have any idea about atoms if you don't notice them in the same way that you notice a thought?
November 05, 2019 at 21:40
I'll gladly be half a philosopher if it means I don't write like Hegel . . . or Heidegger . . . or Derrida . . . etc.
November 05, 2019 at 20:47
The context is one of explaining things. You don't explain something better by saying, "This is some mysterious who knows what"
November 05, 2019 at 20:45
Again, note that we're NOT talking about perception in the sense of receiving data via your senses here (sight, hearing, taste, smell, touch). Because...
November 05, 2019 at 20:44
How are they not noticeable? Note that we're not saying that we can't perceive them with our senses, because that's not what you're saying about thoug...
November 05, 2019 at 19:24
Your definition of analytic philosophy is much too narrow--you seem to basically be equating it with logical positivism/the Vienna Circle as a movemen...
November 05, 2019 at 19:23
It's much more far-fetched to just say that you don't know what it is, exactly, but it is. At any rate, there isn't anything that's not properties.
November 05, 2019 at 19:10
So you're not using "perception" in the conventional sense, because that has a connotation of information obtained via our senses. You're just saying ...
November 05, 2019 at 19:08
Are you saying that you literally see thoughts with your eyes? As I said above: "They're properties of molecules/atoms in particular relations (struct...
November 05, 2019 at 19:04
Are you using "perception" in a way that doesn't refer to becoming aware of information via our senses?
November 05, 2019 at 18:30
So with molecules, for example, we can give their location at a particular time. What's an example of a property we can specify like that of a vague n...
November 05, 2019 at 18:18
duplicate post
November 05, 2019 at 18:10
Yes. Thoughts, desires, emotions, memories, etc. are physical. They're properties of molecules/atoms in particular relations (structures), undergoing ...
November 05, 2019 at 18:10
Right, we agree that some brain states, activities etc. are unconscious.
November 05, 2019 at 17:59
Yes, mental content is brain content. Just like dog behavior is animal behavior. It doesn't follow from this that all brain states are mental states. ...
November 05, 2019 at 17:56
Dogs are animals. Therefore if x is an animal, x is a dog?
November 05, 2019 at 17:43
I love big, sprawling sandbox games where you can spend a lot of time being entertained by just experimenting/dicking around to see what various thing...
November 05, 2019 at 17:10
"You can't square a circle" isn't simple about the shapes/definitions of the shapes of squares and circles. That saying is rather about the challenge ...
November 05, 2019 at 16:49
I don't think that anything has intrinsic value, of course, but I do value all human life, as well as most other animal life (although I'm not against...
November 05, 2019 at 16:42
There had better be a lot of ego in folks acting like children and trying to be "difficult," because the other option(s) is less attractive. Maybe, al...
November 05, 2019 at 16:28