You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Ovaloid

Comments

Is your point that people should have the freedom to judge ideas based on person? I get your point about there being no irrelevant issues and everythi...
September 04, 2016 at 07:54
Are you criticising the idea absolutely or in comparison to another idea you consider better? If in comparison to representative democracy: While it m...
September 04, 2016 at 07:31
Please explain EDIT: if you want, I will look up the disadvantages first. There's no point cluttering up the Internet with the same content
September 03, 2016 at 20:38
It depends on the idea: if it's a philosophy of life then it's effect on someone's personality is important but I can't see how it would otherwise.
September 03, 2016 at 20:26
Can you explain why you think this way?
September 03, 2016 at 19:41
Yes, that could happen for related issues. But if the poster wants to be understood he should link back to his other, relevant posts.
September 03, 2016 at 19:26
Hmm, that point works against the pro-ban side too I see are there stun weapons that stun for a long time (e.g days) until an antidote? The effectiven...
September 03, 2016 at 18:53
I have a solution. Please tell me if it fits your needs: Ban guns, allow tasers and other stun weapons. For police also. Homes and people can still be...
September 03, 2016 at 18:30
Please, stop these un-backed-up, irrelevant and ad-homing generalisations.
September 03, 2016 at 18:21