The right to protest does not confer the right to break the law. It is illegal to pass through a barricade erected by police. Everyone fired upon was ...
...who had breeched the barricades and police lines and after pipe bombs had been found. Are you suggesting the actions of these undermanned police wa...
If the time stamp on the video is correct, these "provocations" by police officers began at 1:15PM. By then, the following had already occurred: 12:45...
This case was always a longshot, but this ruling may actually set the stage for good outcome on appeal. Findings of facts from a trial are rarely over...
I followed the trail back a bit, and it appears you're referring to his 1/6 speech. If so, it's a red herring. The context is relevant: Trump had been...
No one said the link proved all the claims false. The link was offered in response to the claim Trump had just made. Notice the lawyer said nothing ab...
Absolutely. Read the context. The purpose of the link was explicit - that it showed this fraud claim was false, and Trump clearly declined to see it. ...
My first point was: 1)Trump didn't care to see the evidence that disproved his fraud claims From the indictment: The Defendant raised allegations rega...
Your "response" was to evade the points.You had asked: I answered: You responded: This is the only "response" you made to my points, and it said nothi...
Durham fails to mention that at least a preliminary investigation had to be opened to pursue the Papadopoulous lead. He does allude to it being a judg...
Wrong. Some errors were made, but the investigation was warranted. It exposed crimes, exposed corrupt activities by the Trump campaign, and hit a bric...
I'll get there, but first- please respond to the 3 points I made (refer to paragraphs 31& 32 in the indictment). Do you agree with my points? If not, ...
Here's 3 key points from the Georgia call, which seem undeniable: 1)Trump didn't care to see the evidence that disproved his fraud claims. 2) Trump li...
Even if NOS believes it not possible for the judge and jury to be objective, he could, still evaluate the evidence and help assess what an objective j...
Trump's Georgia phone call, and subsequent lies about it, suggest otherwise. I brought up specific details earlier, and you ignored them. This is what...
Smith undoubtedly believes Trump knew the election was not stolen, but that's moot at this point. What matters will be the jury's evaluation of the ev...
Of course you don't "know", but most of us are trying to make an educated guess about the future. This entails trying to objectively evaluate the evid...
Personally, I'm interested in hearing a Trump supporter's perspective of the evidence. I had thought NOS4A2 might provide that. I've been disappointed...
The firing was secondary. He wanted them to LIE. How is that not corrupt, irrespective of the (il)legality? In fact, Trump told a number of lies - inc...
A blatant example of corruption was Trump's asking Rosen (the acting AG) to lie, and "say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Re...
Prosecution doesn't require the certainty of mind-reading, it merely requires establishing corrupt intent based on evidence. I presented some of the e...
There's no basis for claiming Smith "knowingly made a false allegation. You obviously didn't read the indictment. Here's a bit of the evidence Smith p...
Most Republican voters are in denial about Trump's crimes - there's no other explanation for his current polling. More indictments won't change that. ...
Is it truly a sweatheart deal? It's hard to find objective analysis. GOP still claims Hillary should have been indicted, although the evidence shows s...
That "argument" is a political allegation unsupported by evidence. The irony is that there was abundant evidence of Trump's efforts to influence the D...
I'm convinced the majority of Congressional GOP know the allegation is nonsense (idiots like MTG notwithstanding). But they know the fiction appeals t...
That wasn't an irrational conspiracy theory- the Russians did such things in 2016- and they merely noted this seemed consistent, while not denying it ...
You're treating a distorted partisan narrative as established fact. No signatories of the letter were in the CIA at the time of signing. They could on...
Mischaracterization. The former intel officials did not say it was misinformation. Here's a quote from the letter: We want to emphasize that we do not...
The problem with your claim is that it seem to merely be parrotting a GOP talking point, that is rooted in applying confirmation bias to anecdotal evi...
I note that you had nothing to say with regard to my debunking your claim about these documents being his personal records, as opposed to Presidential...
100% agree. It seems to me this originates in the fact that Trump has been investigated so much, and GOP is loath to think any investigation of him ca...
I'll add this to your solid info: Hunter was added to the Burisma board AFTER the illegal activities occurred, and his specific role isn't implicated ...
It's surreal, but it works up their audience (=Trump's base). I'm also amazed at how much mileage the GOP is getting out of the FBI 1023 form, and how...
This overlooks the very reason the Presidential Records Act was passed: it was in response to Nixon's treating Presidential Records (including recordi...
Incredible article, written by Andrew McCarthy - a former DOJ prosecutor, who's a staunch Conservative with a history of defending Trump's behavior. I...
Comments