You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Relativist

Comments

What's the basis for your claim that it makes no sense?
January 20, 2025 at 20:09
Infinity is not a thing that exists. It is a concept, and when it is applied to sets - it can lead to inconsistencies. There are infinitely many integ...
January 20, 2025 at 16:13
There are "countably many" integers. That doesn't imply they can all be counted, but one can map a counting process to the set of integers. In the rea...
January 19, 2025 at 22:39
Aren't all of its properties essential to it?
January 18, 2025 at 18:51
First of all, thanks for pointing out my error. Sorry about that. So at this point, I don't see any logical inconsistency in your position. I don't ag...
January 17, 2025 at 15:57
Sorry for the long delay in respoinding. I earlier brought up the fact that a paper cutter could be used as a torture device, even though it wasn't de...
January 13, 2025 at 22:48
Read about the difference between intrinsic and extrinsic properties here: "We have some of our properties purely in virtue of the way we are. (Our ma...
January 07, 2025 at 12:28
"Natural kind essentialism is a specification of the intuitive idea that there are some mind-independent or objective categories in nature." (Definiti...
January 05, 2025 at 17:50
As you said, everything supervenes on the ultimate foundation of physical reality. That doesn't strictly depend on physicalism being true, it just dep...
January 03, 2025 at 17:38
This contradicts what you said earlier: It's also absurd to claim that a function that an object can perform is its identity. It certainly doesn't uni...
January 02, 2025 at 04:29
You implied that, in this physicalist scenario, ONLY strings have an identity (and only strings have an essence). If only one thing has an identity an...
January 01, 2025 at 02:56
You previously asked: Per your paradigm, if physicalism is true, then horses are just strings not ontological objects in their own right. There is no ...
December 30, 2024 at 16:12
It seems to me that "solving the problem" entails rationalizing - showing it possible, not showing it's plausible, or better yet- that it's the best e...
December 29, 2024 at 01:22
The best explanation for laws of nature is law-realism: a law reflects a relation between universals. In simpler terms: they are part of the fabric of...
December 28, 2024 at 22:57
Omniscience is implausible to me. Yoy don't seem to agree, so why don't you explain why you find it plausible - addressing the objections I raised. On...
December 28, 2024 at 21:45
There is a Totality of Existence (TOE), and that is what I was treating as "existence". It's the TOE that could not have been created. The material wo...
December 28, 2024 at 18:19
Omniscience+omniscience has infinite explanatory scope - so it's certainly a convenient assumption. But it's an enormous assumption that's as implausi...
December 28, 2024 at 17:48
Even a God is temporally delimited if the past is finite. He simply exists at all times. The same is true of a material foundation. Regarding parts:wh...
December 28, 2024 at 17:34
It's logically impossible for existence to be created. Philosophers can only speculate. Physicists engage in speculations too, but then they test them...
December 28, 2024 at 16:37
They are "things" as I defined, and used, the term ("existent"). I don't think it's possible for science to establish anything as an ontological found...
December 28, 2024 at 04:06
"Thing" = an existent. A God would be a very different sort of thing, but it would still be an existent (a "thing"). It would have some characteristic...
December 28, 2024 at 03:12
The relevance is that God sans universe is not equivalent to nothingness. My point is that there's an implicit false dichotomy between a universe from...
December 28, 2024 at 02:01
Omniscience entails an infinitely complex set of knowledge, existing by brute fact. Divine simplicity doesn't deal with this.
December 28, 2024 at 01:32
If there is a God, then it exists. I believe the claim is that God is the foundation of reality - everything else is ontologically dependent on God, s...
December 27, 2024 at 22:20
It's the job of physicists to figure out why there's an imbalance between particles and antiparticles. It doesn't make much sense to attribute every u...
December 27, 2024 at 21:52
The argument doesn't prove a "God" exists. It proves there is an autonomous, bottom layer of reality. This is metaphysical foundationalism.
December 27, 2024 at 17:58
Divine creation is not "something from nothing". It assumes God pre-exists matter, but God is something. If there is no God, then there was no state o...
December 27, 2024 at 17:54
Abstractions do not exist independently in the world. They reflect relations between things that do exist; so they exist immanently.
December 25, 2024 at 15:29
But this means, that if physicalism is true, and strings are the bottom layer, then everything is "nothing but" strings - so nothing has an identity o...
December 24, 2024 at 04:11
This is supposed to be evidence of corruption!? Such evidence is admissible, per Federal Rule of evidence 415: In a civil case involving a claim for r...
December 20, 2024 at 17:29
That seems the most plausible explanation.
December 20, 2024 at 16:24
It makes sense to you because you believe God created everything. Here's a more general metaphysical perspective. Unless one accepts an infinite serie...
December 20, 2024 at 16:08
So you think intelligence, and knowledge just happens to exist uncaused? To your question: entropy is a measure of the number of different ways that a...
December 20, 2024 at 02:41
Has a judge or jury judged Willis as corrupt? The appellate court merely judged there was an "appearance of impropriety", and removed her because this...
December 20, 2024 at 01:21
There is no evidence that entails God. Your observations of the world are seen through the prism of your belief in God. The signs you see of intellige...
December 20, 2024 at 01:13
It's not a synonym. I think you're saying that an identity has a unique essence. But that still leaves "essence" undefined. You later said, "a being, ...
December 20, 2024 at 00:14
This thread is about "proving" God. I hope you can see that you're not doing that. I'm fine with people having faith-based beliefs, but they shouldn't...
December 19, 2024 at 22:30
Are you saying the "signs of intelligence" in the universe are...us? Either way, how does that imply "intrinsic intelligence" embedded in the universe...
December 19, 2024 at 21:46
From the article you linked: The court added: “We cannot conclude that the record also supports the imposition of the extreme sanction of dismissal of...
December 19, 2024 at 17:25
Another technicality that has zero bearing on Trump's guilt in the crimes for which he was indicted. Jack Smith will be out of a job soon. I wonder if...
December 19, 2024 at 16:40
I find it hilarious that you Trumpists consider the semantic distinction (rape vs sexual assault) a bigger deal than the fact Trump committed the sexu...
December 19, 2024 at 16:38
If RFKJr is confirmed as Secretary of HHS, we may see considerably more institutions taking silly claims seriously.
December 18, 2024 at 17:25
The notion that the government has been hiding the known presence of extraterrestrial beings/technology can absolutely be dismissed out of hand. The p...
December 18, 2024 at 16:18
To me, "essence" suggests a set of necessary and sufficient properties that uniquely identify an existing, individual object. Existence isn't a proper...
December 18, 2024 at 05:50
I expect there are some members of Congress who take kooks like Elizando seriously, but focusing on national security provides common ground, and lets...
December 18, 2024 at 01:38
Government officials are people too, so I think it applies even to them (perhaps a smaller percentage).
December 18, 2024 at 01:07
Aliens are a given to many people, and I suspect, others are apt to be easily convinced because they hope for (or dread) their presence. I've encounte...
December 18, 2024 at 00:54
Can you make a case for your belief, or is it an article of faith?
December 17, 2024 at 23:45
The survey showed that atheists were more likely than Christians to believe there was life elsewhere in the universe. That's probably because they bel...
December 17, 2024 at 23:37
UAP does not entail aliens; the concern is that a foreign government might be using technology beyond ours. That is potentially relevant, but that may...
December 17, 2024 at 23:14