You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Relativist

Comments

ROFL! Apparently amnesia is one of the disorders contributing to the denial of his crimes. We've discussed various of Trump's crimes in the past, and ...
February 09, 2025 at 18:06
Thanks for proving my point.
February 09, 2025 at 17:07
That is a much better question. You acknowledge a future, and I assume you also acknowledge a past. This suggests a ordered relation: past->present->f...
February 09, 2025 at 16:26
They do, but IMO it's because of their faith in Trump. Trump's defense of his crimes entails blaming the system. It's reminiscent of OJ insisting LAPD...
February 09, 2025 at 16:04
I agree.
February 09, 2025 at 13:04
The fiction of dragons includes "breathing fire". But fictions still can't engage in the real world activity. Do you understand my objection to the or...
February 09, 2025 at 02:26
I see your point.
February 09, 2025 at 02:06
Breathing is a real world activity by real world creatures. A fiction can't do this. IMO there's one ontology. Dragons are either real-world creatures...
February 09, 2025 at 01:59
This would imply that the set of all dragons includes all the real dragons and all the fictional creatures so-named. Some members of the set are said ...
February 09, 2025 at 01:46
Not necessarily. 60-70% of Republicans believe the 2020 election was stolen, and therefore Trump was justified in trying to remedy that situation. I d...
February 09, 2025 at 01:37
It would be correct to say: "the sentence: 'dragons breath fire' is true whether or not dragons exist" because: -If dragons exist, then "dragon" refer...
February 09, 2025 at 01:21
You've identified even more ambiguity. These all higlight the significance of semantics when sharing information.
February 09, 2025 at 01:06
The probability that magical knowledge exists is low, as I discussed. This is sufficient reason to reject your conclusion prima facie that a being wit...
February 09, 2025 at 00:41
The sentence could be read either way. Here's another that spotlights semantic ambiguity: Whether they exist or not, dragons breathe fire.
February 08, 2025 at 20:06
It's a semantic issue. The nouns have a referent. The referent could be a concept in your mind, or it could be the actual object that exists in the wo...
February 08, 2025 at 19:22
Why must I do that? I showed you to have a burden based on your expressed purpose of swaying some people. You've sidestepped that entirely, and are ba...
February 08, 2025 at 19:03
"On Thursday, at a federal courthouse in Washington state, U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour—an 84-year-old Ronald Reagan appointee—delivered a s...
February 08, 2025 at 18:56
I absolutely agree this cannot be topped. On the other hand, this "Truth" Social post puts his abject stupidity on full display: "20 years ago, Autism...
February 07, 2025 at 16:32
No. Do you only believe things that are proven? Apparently not. So do you just adopt beliefs arbitrarily?
February 07, 2025 at 03:40
Your premises aren't "proven" at all: you made no case for them. We agree they are possibly true (logical possibility), but your propositions (at leas...
February 06, 2025 at 14:01
What makes Iraqi Sesame Street "bullshit"? It's been part of the effort to restore the country to normalcy after the devastation inflicted by Bush's w...
February 05, 2025 at 15:18
Add manslaughter to the list of Trump's crimes: Deaths predicted amid the chaos of Elon Musk’s shutdown of USAid Critical supplies of life-saving medi...
February 05, 2025 at 03:43
That's the design, but the GOP leadership is letting Trump do whatever he wants.
February 05, 2025 at 03:37
I read the entire post. Regretfully.
February 03, 2025 at 11:43
I'm starting with this point, because it has bearing on whether or not this discussion is worthwhile: The typical purpose of an argument is to change ...
February 03, 2025 at 06:34
I read it. It doesn't have an example of a "should", and in no way addresses my broader issue:
February 03, 2025 at 01:54
Matter isn't an explanation; it's an explanatory hypothesis that a particular kind of thing exists.The hypothesis explains all those sensations. Newto...
February 02, 2025 at 22:13
I assumed you meant your second post in this thread. It says nothing about atoms or molecules. I then went that that other thread you referenced (http...
February 02, 2025 at 21:06
You had said, "The 'should' is entirely logical." I'm trying to understand what that means. So I gave you an example which you rejected with a reason ...
February 02, 2025 at 20:29
Let's focus on this point: It sounds like you might say "an electron should be attracted to a proton"? But clearly the electron has no choice in the m...
February 02, 2025 at 20:01
That is precisely what I've been challenging! The very point you're responding to is such a challenge! Your response should be to explain how "should"...
February 02, 2025 at 19:13
"Should" only applies only to choices made by beings that can make choices. It would make no sense to claim an electron "should" be attracted to a pro...
February 02, 2025 at 17:09
No it doesn't. I accepted that a moral value can exist. But if it's a product of "random existence", there are 2 implications: 1) it's existence is co...
February 02, 2025 at 16:11
There is a problem with the argument I stated: it assumes God exists. To then use the conclusion to support an argument for God's existence entails th...
February 02, 2025 at 06:05
Your logic in the Op was based on the assumption that objective morality exists. I'm showing that morality that is the product of a random existence c...
February 01, 2025 at 18:39
A moral imperative that is a "random addition" is not an objective moral value, it's a random value whose converse could have instead come to exist. I...
February 01, 2025 at 15:46
How do you get a relevant* moral imperative from an undesigned universe composed of matter and energy and evolving deterministically? You compared it ...
January 31, 2025 at 23:04
You refer to "shoulds" - which sounds to me like moral imperatives. Correct me if this is not what you mean. A red wavelength of light exists by brute...
January 31, 2025 at 19:05
I used the word "arbitrary" to highlight the fact there is no reason for these cosmic morals to be what they are. There can't be a reason unless there...
January 31, 2025 at 15:55
Your paradigm assumes there are moral values existing external to humans that were caused to exist by undirected natural forces. You have not explaine...
January 31, 2025 at 13:59
Read this post: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/962312 If you want more details on the math, read this post: https://thephilosophyfo...
January 30, 2025 at 22:30
And yet, in transfinite math, all the sets you mentioned are the same "size" (the same cardinality).
January 30, 2025 at 22:13
It boils down to an initial, uncaused state of affairs. What that might be is unknown, but whatever it is, it exists for no reason. This is because to...
January 30, 2025 at 17:22
I was listening today to a legal podcast, and they brought up an issue I hadn't thought of, regarding the withdrawal of Secret Service protection from...
January 28, 2025 at 23:50
It's anachronistic. Per general relativity, mass and energy are interchangeable. What is conserved is the total amount of mass+energy (see this). Rega...
January 28, 2025 at 18:48
Thanks. You've set my mind at ease. :rofl:
January 28, 2025 at 18:00
Here's what I inferred to be your reasoning: 1.God is omniscient (possesses all possible knowledge) 2. God is simple; 3. Therefore knowledge doesn't e...
January 28, 2025 at 17:29
I found this study, with data through 2016 (unfortunately). There seems to be an increasing trend for women to study philosophy- most apparent in the ...
January 28, 2025 at 15:25
Not really. The undocumented workers are making more in the US than they could in their home country. The fact we'd take advantage of that seems simil...
January 28, 2025 at 14:58
So it appears you have some sort of hypothesis that goodness is some sort of existing entity that we perceive, or perhaps that its a physical property...
January 28, 2025 at 05:18