You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

mcc1789

['Member']Joined: June 30, 2018 at 07:31Last active: April 05, 2021 at 16:521 discussions39 comments

Discussions (1)

Comments

Aristotle also proposed explanations (most were wrong, of course, and admittedly he didn't always investigate enough). Not only him, but many others i...
January 07, 2020 at 20:26
All right.
July 13, 2018 at 14:38
You need more to convince others.
July 12, 2018 at 23:58
Support your argument first. Thus far all that I've seen is you asserting this.
July 12, 2018 at 21:42
You simply beg the question. I am not "negating" anything.
July 12, 2018 at 16:48
You said everything is dependent on thought. I'm not seeing why that is. Sure, we do depend upon thought to discern reality. That doesn't mean that th...
July 12, 2018 at 01:44
I'm not seeing a justification of your stance, and I wanted one.
July 11, 2018 at 22:29
Why?
July 11, 2018 at 21:12
That didn't answer the question. I don't think we engage with reality solely by thought. In any case, that does not tell us it's entirely thought. You...
July 11, 2018 at 05:56
Ah. I'm not sold on that either.
July 10, 2018 at 05:08
I may have misunderstood. You stated: That seemed like it meant you rejected objective morality too. Are they distinct for you? On your question thoug...
July 10, 2018 at 03:04
That makes sense. I'd say your view isn't that different from an ethical naturalist in practice, even if we disagree over the metaethical status of mo...
July 10, 2018 at 02:28
Ah, that makes sense. I'm familiar with that idea from my history readings. However only having seen it once I don't remember the details of the play.
July 10, 2018 at 02:27
Yes.
July 10, 2018 at 01:49
I thought it was sorry. So what I mean is "general agreement". Where the line is drawn I agree would be difficult. I wasn't aware of that. Why did the...
July 10, 2018 at 01:41
That's true, it can be difficult. It is better to say there's a consensus.
July 10, 2018 at 01:31
I'm pretty sure that's not constant. Let me be more specific: pain such that they can't even do anything, such as unfortunately some of the sick have ...
July 10, 2018 at 01:26
It was metaphorical yes. Well, it's an objective fact, i.e. my opinion doesn't change this.
July 10, 2018 at 01:19
I know it doesn't literally. That earth revolves though is a fact.
July 10, 2018 at 01:15
Really. Who likes to be in constant pain? Tell me. I think that seems fine so far.
July 10, 2018 at 01:14
Why do you think that? How does this explain things happening people profoundly dislike, if it's just thought?
July 10, 2018 at 01:03
A guess? If you mean it's not absolutely certain, perhaps so. Certain as anything gets though. However even if I have my guess wrong, it will or won't...
July 10, 2018 at 00:58
That the sun will rise and set is independent of my opinion. Whether or not I happen to agree with it, this will happen nonetheless. That is simply on...
July 10, 2018 at 00:51
Which opinion is that?
July 10, 2018 at 00:36
It was believed, but wasn't true. There is a difference. Quite probably. However my point is certain facts exist independent of opinion. Do you disagr...
July 10, 2018 at 00:27
That's absurd. Are you saying until then the earth really was the center of the solar system? Come on.
July 10, 2018 at 00:20
They don't actually want bad health (and in moderation not all of these things cause it). However, addiction gets in the way.
July 10, 2018 at 00:14
So were Galileo or Copernicus wrong when they said heliocentrism was true because most astronomers didn't agree at the time?
July 10, 2018 at 00:03
It's true there is not a uniform agreement. At the same time however, there do seem some things which can be agreed upon, for instance being in consta...
July 10, 2018 at 00:01
Why is it ambiguous by extending to the brain? I'm not sure what you mean with your example. Would hating every aspect of society mean that health is ...
July 09, 2018 at 23:59
They differ to some degree. I'm not aware of anyone who likes to be sick all the time for instance however.
July 09, 2018 at 23:55
I agree, it seems like the burden lies on them, and it's a difficult onus. Some whom I've seen simply defend moral realism by rebutting attacks, thus ...
July 09, 2018 at 23:36
I assume you mean by "impossible" it's impossible to get it universally accepted? That may be true. I agree, it is very damaging.
July 09, 2018 at 23:34
An interestingly succinct argument.
July 09, 2018 at 23:33
I'm sorry, I misunderstood you then. There are of course always difficulties in getting something intellectually accepted. On the other hand, I don't ...
July 09, 2018 at 23:33
Okay. I think it does, but I'm not sure how many there are. Those you and I listed however would be there. As to I would say he's not going to be in g...
July 09, 2018 at 23:30
I wasn't trying to "evade" anything, just adding to your examples, and describing my agreement with them. How should I engage those? I don't get what ...
July 09, 2018 at 23:11
The view that morals, rather than subjective opinions, social constructs or nonexistent, are objective facts in some way. Here is a rundown.
July 09, 2018 at 23:03
I'm a supporter of ethical naturalism, and I'd add happiness in general, or sophisticated pleasure (distinguished from ones which cause pain, like say...
July 09, 2018 at 23:00