You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

fishfry

Comments

In the Edit window there's a row of icons with B for bold, slanted I for italic, etc. The eighth icon from the left lets you insert a graphic from the...
January 16, 2020 at 01:51
That's a good point. The first-mover argument is essentially a Christian idea. "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." That's @"Deva...
January 16, 2020 at 01:48
Ellipses simply means the pattern continues. How would you write the set of integers? Just like that. You are confusing your evidence-free intuitions ...
January 16, 2020 at 01:40
You just make this shit up. How do you measure how much we need to know about something before we can name it? On the contrary, the day they discovere...
January 16, 2020 at 01:39
I'd have gladly stuck around for intelligent dialog; but once I was told to "step off" it was either tell that individual to FUCK off, or depart the c...
January 16, 2020 at 01:21
They're exactly the same. So there aren't two types, only one type. Because there's only one zero. I have an answer to your latest post about the infi...
January 15, 2020 at 08:12
This is the graph of f(x) = \frac{1}{x}. If you write y = f(x) then it comes out to your notation using y. Another way it's often written is xy = 1. T...
January 15, 2020 at 07:07
You can certainly define a measure on the unit interval of reals and assign probabilities to sets of bitstrings. I didn't follow this post. You said y...
January 15, 2020 at 05:23
Confused by this. Constructive physics wouldn't allow a random sequence.
January 15, 2020 at 05:21
Ok. So whether we use constructive or classical real numbers, we get the same physics. We get the same theorems and we can't measure any difference. H...
January 15, 2020 at 05:19
Not at all. What law of nature says the collection of causes must be well-ordered? I agree it's intuitively appealing that there must be a first cause...
January 15, 2020 at 05:10
Labeling my remark sexist is not an argument against my point. I do apologize if you feel that I hijacked your thread. This isn't the time for me to e...
January 15, 2020 at 00:48
I did not knowingly hijack. A lot of people are saying two things right now: 1) That Meghan was treated badly by the Royals due to her race. On the co...
January 15, 2020 at 00:30
I don't watch videos. Text is faster. Can you summarize it please? It says it's about racism. I don't think there's a racial angle to this. The Royal ...
January 15, 2020 at 00:13
Why is Caitlyn Jenner celebrated and Rachel Dolezal excoriated? 'Splain me that. It's a puzzler.
January 15, 2020 at 00:08
Bullpucky. Nobody (not me anyway) gives a shit about Meg's heritage. She's a toxic female running and ruining the life of a weak male. That cuts acros...
January 14, 2020 at 23:52
I think what I was getting at is that you made the claim that constructive and classical physics were equivalent categories; and I asked you to clarif...
January 14, 2020 at 23:46
As it happens, here is how I learned about what you're describing. I never had much physics background. A few years ago I had the opportunity to serio...
January 14, 2020 at 23:40
Wrong theory. If something is computable or not, that's computability theory. If something is computable efficiently or inefficiently, that's complexi...
January 14, 2020 at 23:25
Here's a nice contemporary example of exactly that. Do you happen to know what dark matter is? Don't worry if you don't, because nobody knows what dar...
January 14, 2020 at 22:58
Nonsense. I can prove it easily. The measure of the unit interval is 1; the measure of the computable reals in the unit interval is zero. Therefore th...
January 14, 2020 at 22:43
For two people trying to end a conversation we're not doing a very good job. I want to make a semantic point, which is that intuitionism is too vague....
January 14, 2020 at 22:31
I just showed you a model of infinite causal regress. It's the plain old integers. What law of nature says it can't exist? On the contrary, it probabl...
January 14, 2020 at 22:13
These notations designate the same ordered set. The point is that there's no reason that there must be a first element in an ordered set of causes. Th...
January 14, 2020 at 22:11
Why not? To me it seems like this is the solution to the first mover problem. Everyone's moved yet there is no first mover. What law of nature says th...
January 14, 2020 at 06:30
You reject science. In science we DON'T know what something is. So we give it a symbolic name, write down the symbol's properties, and reason about it...
January 14, 2020 at 02:18
I think there's a bit of a logic flaw in Pascal's wager. You have to not only believe in God, you have to believe in a God that condemns you to eterna...
January 14, 2020 at 01:15
Why not? What if each fine tuner (fine tuna?) is indexed by an integer, like so: \dots, -4, \ -3, \ -2, \ -1, \ 0, \ 1, \ 2, \ 3, \ 4, \ 5, \dots Each...
January 14, 2020 at 01:03
The federal government requires television networks to beam free NFL football games into my living room in HD. That's the kind of authoritarianism I c...
January 14, 2020 at 00:14
Alright man. It's not set theory you object to, it's 10th grade algebra. It's not abstraction you object to, it's the very concept of using the symbol...
January 13, 2020 at 19:56
This is a common claim of people trying to debunk conspiracy theories. I have four points of refutation that have been on my mind. I'm so glad we're t...
January 13, 2020 at 07:58
@"Metaphysician Undercover", Let me just put this remark here because it's the core of the problem. In order to figure out things that we don't unders...
January 13, 2020 at 07:17
This is surely no criticism of me since; for one thing, I have already admitted my ignorance of much of classical philosophy. And you are abysmally ig...
January 13, 2020 at 05:20
Ok. It was only recently that I learned that protons have quarks inside them. Another thing I've learned is that gravitational mass is caused by the b...
January 13, 2020 at 04:31
I had a long convo about all this with @"alcontali" I believe, a while back. At that time I felt that I'd satisfied my curiosity about the subject of ...
January 13, 2020 at 03:42
Yes in fact at the time I couldn't understand how your name got in there. Might have messed up the editing at my end.
January 13, 2020 at 03:10
This paragraph seems to bear on my conversation with @"Metaphysician Undercover". I can indeed specify \sqrt 2; but when I do so I am merely "expressi...
January 12, 2020 at 08:54
Ok this is the post I wanted to get to. Ok that's beyond my pay grade, but maybe I can tell you what I know about it. Say you have a hydrogen atom, on...
January 12, 2020 at 08:48
I do not see how this can be. The constructive real line is not Cauchy-complete. It's only countably infinite. It does not contain any of the noncompu...
January 12, 2020 at 08:21
That's interesting. I never looked at universal algebra but what you describe is a lot like category theory. There's a construction called a "product"...
January 12, 2020 at 08:09
The context here is the fact that the statement "Every vector space has a basis," is fully equivalent to the axiom of choice. Each implies the other. ...
January 12, 2020 at 07:40
That's what abstraction is! It's giving a name to something immaterial in order to manipulate it. We see 2 cows and 2 pigs and 2 chickens and 2 barnya...
January 12, 2020 at 07:02
I've never looked at the book and have no interest in constructive physics. You'll have to forgive me. Personally I think it's a fool's errand. I have...
January 12, 2020 at 06:38
What a great topic. If you Google "constructive physics," you find a small but nonzero number of paywalled articles on the subject . I believe there's...
January 11, 2020 at 05:31
Yes, great insight. The mathematical real numbers are very strange. I always noticed that the more I learned about the real numbers, the more unreal t...
January 11, 2020 at 05:25
You know, that is a very interesting point of view. As I said I find it nihilistic because you must then reject all of the modern world that sprung fr...
January 11, 2020 at 04:38
Please explain this to @"Metaphysician Undercover"! I've had no luck.
January 10, 2020 at 19:38
Yes indeed. I think of them as the "dark matter" of the real number line. We can't name them, we can't compute them, we can't use them for anything. B...
January 10, 2020 at 19:38
True, but she received a lot of criticism at the time, including from Obama. Her warmongering is what cost her the Dem nomination. So yes, she was mak...
January 10, 2020 at 19:36
In practical terms I agree. If we left there would be a bloodbath. This is how we stayed so long in Vietnam. We didn't want to "waste" all the lives a...
January 10, 2020 at 19:33