raza

So you have some study to do. I doubt you will, however.

Evidence supplied. Browder testimony in link provided. So that is “where” my evidence is. Right in this thread. If you don’t want to open it, but clai...

It’s always the entire geopolitics. The Trump/Russia conspiracy theory is not in isolation. It involves Crimea, Ukraine, and all those US neocon polit...

It is in the history within the article I have linked which you have not read. The story is entwined with the current twists of US, Russia relations. ...

Browder, an utter fraudster. Caught stealing from Russia $230,000,000. Created a coverup story implicating enemies. He sweats through this testimony p...

Bill Broweder’s lying is obvious. I watched his entire testimony in 7 parts. https://youtu.be/OBjO0TIb7pw

You certainly couldn’t have read the article in that time.

A week ago, or so, I watched this documentary on YouTube. Immediately after I posted link to this forum. Within 2 or 3 days Youtube purged the video f...

https://youtu.be/fWkfpGCAAuw

Including motive (Pence to replace Trump).

A fuller history, perhaps: http://rinf.com/alt-news/editorials/agents-at-ap-hudson-institute-collaborate-with-impeach-trump-effort/

Well, we should all know what the “business” is by now. Insert evidence of DNC servers being hacked by Putin here >……………………< Or go home.

They certainly don’t miss a trick to find an excuse to destroy evidence of what would have been contrary to the narrative. Clinton: “Like, with a clot...

Evidence thereof, within >...........<

They want you to merely believe, and that is what you are doing. Insert “hacked by Putin” DNC servers here >.............................................

Objectivism isn’t real. Everything is subjective.

I’m not interested until I see the evidence. Until then my opinions and theories are as worthy as yours. What you decide to believe is true is a belie...

And yet, YOU have not seen evidence. The government military industrial complex lies ad finitum. Always have. How is your wardrobe of brown shirts?

You had, and I remember replying with an article such as this one (or it was this one). By EMILY SCHULTHEIS CBS NEWS January 10, 2017, 2:36 PM FBI Dir...

I would say it is merely something they have been doing with the US for decades just as the US have been doing to them for decades. You really think t...

They do happen to put a lot of work into their coverups. No, not interested in this “Q” deal.

I’m happy that you are amused.

Your intellect on this matter is outstanding.......for you.

They received Crowdstrike’s analysis. So let’s breakdown the only “evidence” YOU have seen. “We assess with high confidence that the GRU relayed mater...

Now you are sliding from what you were arguing about. Now you’re back to Facebook ads.

It is indisputable that this is the only “evidence YOU have seen: “We assess with high confidence that the GRU relayed material it acquired from the D...

Now that is stupid. Access to the server does not automatically equate with “scrummaging around in it”. It means the FBI use the tools necessary rathe...

So let us combine these two. “Third, the Dutch, UK and German intelligence agencies warned the US about the hacks. That's why they know they hacked th...

Why no server? Why image and not the server itself? You are the intended audience of this nonsense.

Like how intelligence agents leak to the press? The only “source” is the supposedly “hacked” server. The server the FBI were denied access to. So what...

“Moscow most likely chose WikiLeaks because of its self- proclaimed reputation for authenticity” Look at this line, “most likely”.

They are “confident” about a theory they are left with. They show nothing else other than a theory. A theory is not factual evidence whether confident...

Ok. The FBI were denied access to the DNC server. Here, from that document, is all that is said with regard to an analysis that the server was hacked ...

Often it is the other way around, from my experience. Should I have felt used? Is what you wrote just your experience, or what survey are you referrin...

For fairness every accuser should have to face a situation of making their accusations under oath, if what we are looking at here are suggestions that...

That document is not about evidence of the Trump election campaign colluding with the Russian government.

Well, Trump is under constant attack which seems designed to trip him up on practically anything in order to obstruct his program, Consequently he can...

On the other hand, it may not have been safe from a political optics, prior to election, point of view, as, at that time, the actual victims of a set ...

I think mistakes were made along the way. The mistakes maybe just that some of these guys did not realize they would have been safe from the outset to...

There is plenty of dirt to be found. Once it is all gathered, or that obstruction to it is conquered, then it will become apparent.

Without any presentation of evidence.

a presumption is a presumption. To call a presumption a false presumption is like calling a question a false question or a doubt a false doubt. I coul...

Time may tell.

Ok. So what? As I said, maybe Wapo should seek the opinion of the current occupier of that position. Do you think I am some loyal republican or someth...

It is what I am going with. As I have said countless times about this case, we shall just have to wait and see. You have a narrative and opinion you a...

Emphasis should be on “former” chief counsel. This means he has no horse in the race which futher means he can say whatever he likes without threat to...

And you come under the definition of “public”. Therefore you cannot present irrefutable proof. For you, someone just has to say “irrefutable proof” ex...

I’m not surprised because it is original and not like the baaaa baaa sheep-like calls such as “what you smoking?”

At least this is an admission from you that no irrefutable proof exists of your accusation. As for the Wapo article you submitted, it is wapo. Wapo is...

I’m smoking because I’m on fire. The opposite temperature to the snowflake you represent.