Does it solve the problem to say that the domain of morality is the possible and therefore trying to ensure the well-being of each individual is not c...
Individuals separated by their interests, that is, making an individual much better off does not compensate another individual being worse off, and th...
So let's assume for the moment that the domain of morality is the possible and its objectives are valuable even though they will never be fully achiev...
The main problem with Utilitarisnism is the lack of recognition of separateness of persons and therefore the tyranny of majority and allowing unpropor...
So let's reformulate the questions: If (semi-)objective morality aims at providing equal or sufficient well-being for each sentient being, even though...
I assume there might be morally identical cases even there are no identical cases concerning human beings. As long as all the relevant criterions are ...
I think this is a good point, probably morality is not objective, but let's say might get close to being objective, the question is however, what coul...
I agree that morality is not "merely" about the individual, but it seems to me that maximizing the well-being of a team/group at the expense of an ind...
Provided we ensure a lower "floor" below which no one need fall? Looking at it from my own point of view, it doesn't matter to me in the least that so...
@unenlightened You can call it justice or morality To be honest, I am not really sure what is the difference between the two. "that my joy and sufferi...
It seems the only possible way for objective morality to exist is through aiming at equally dealing with equal cases. So I could say: Objective morali...
I would define objective morality,as I suppose as something like this; "equal consideration of equal interests of sentient beings per life time", or t...
Comments