You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

m-theory

Comments

I am glad this thread got posted. I think this is a much better narrative than denial in the context of climate change debate.
January 03, 2017 at 14:40
Is it true that there is another way philosophy has long been practiced Yes or No?
January 03, 2017 at 07:27
What type of philosophy has long been practiced?
January 03, 2017 at 07:15
I argue something similar about sustainable energy. It will cost less to implement sustainable solutions now rather than put it off until later. While...
January 03, 2017 at 07:12
You want to control how other people answer, but at the same time, you yourself are against being controlled. That is kind of funny.
January 03, 2017 at 07:06
That is ironic.
January 03, 2017 at 07:00
I think he has a teds talk as well.
January 02, 2017 at 18:12
This would be great if it was about something.
January 02, 2017 at 16:42
I think we are done here.
January 02, 2017 at 16:20
WTF? You "Who cares that 10% died in the past"
January 02, 2017 at 16:20
Consumption is a basic fact of the human condition, we consume. This cannot be avoided.
January 02, 2017 at 16:19
I think you are not being very reasonable. Pinker does not imply that violence in more recent centuries is less appalling. He points out that it is a ...
January 02, 2017 at 16:18
Yes but if no one consumes their material they will not succeed in that intention.
January 02, 2017 at 16:11
Well Pinker addresses that in the vid.
January 02, 2017 at 16:11
Aren't all authors intended to be consumed?
January 02, 2017 at 16:08
I think Pinker gives us good evidence to believe that more recent centuries were not in fact the bloodiest of all time.
January 02, 2017 at 16:06
I am a glass half full type of guy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ramBFRt1Uzk .
January 02, 2017 at 16:01
lol Scientology?
January 02, 2017 at 11:39
Well that should not be surprising being that there is a disagreement about what it is rational to believe. Theist are not much better in my experienc...
January 02, 2017 at 07:21
From your position you can't know if we can or can not obtain truthfully objective facts.
January 02, 2017 at 07:08
This is only subjective. This is only subjective. You still haven't proven anything about the objective. From you position, that everything is subject...
January 02, 2017 at 06:44
Basically by saying there is only the subjective you set yourself up so that you can't disprove that anything is objective. It is impossible, as you p...
January 02, 2017 at 06:38
This is not an objective fact. This is not an objective fact This is not an objective fact Nothing you have here has any consequences for objective fa...
January 02, 2017 at 06:33
Subjective facts don't prove anything about objective facts. So what, it is a subjective fact, who cares?
January 02, 2017 at 06:25
It is not an objective fact that it is impossible to find any objective facts. See the pattern yet? By definition you have not refuted anything about ...
January 02, 2017 at 05:57
That runs afoul with the same issue. It is not an objective fact that objective fact's don't exist. If it was, it would be self refuting.
January 02, 2017 at 05:52
Yes but it is not an objective fact. So why should I care? It does not refute anything about objective facts.
January 02, 2017 at 05:38
We can't go beyond subjectivity is refuted if it is supposed to be an objective fact
January 02, 2017 at 05:31
No I am saying that what you said is not objectively true. At least not without being self refuting.
January 02, 2017 at 05:25
lol, you are trolling me right now?
January 02, 2017 at 05:06
You mean it is not true unless I voluntarily admit I am wrong?
January 02, 2017 at 05:04
Right it is only subjective. Because you can't go beyond the subjective. This means it is not an objective fact what you have said. If it was an objec...
January 02, 2017 at 05:03
Me too. I wonder why people argue that. Then you can't say it is an objective fact that we can't go beyond subjectivity. That would be self refuting.
January 02, 2017 at 04:58
It is not an objective fact. After all you can't go beyond subjectivity remember.
January 02, 2017 at 04:34
I can't prove it to you. I am fine with that, as long as you agree that some things a true involuntarily and that it is practical to use measurements.
January 02, 2017 at 04:33
The point I am making is that, for practical purposes, some things are less subject to interpretation than others. The sooner you embrace this fact th...
January 02, 2017 at 04:27
Follow up question. If your life depended on it. Would you rather I simply interpret what is 6 ft, or use a tape measure?
January 02, 2017 at 04:23
Don't you agree that is why we use tapes, because they do not interpret?
January 02, 2017 at 04:21
You are not being very reasonable. Either tapes can interpret or they can not. Which would you say is the case?
January 02, 2017 at 04:15
There was someone on here that mentioned there are four different types of love I think that I agree with them from what they described. I think you a...
January 02, 2017 at 04:13
Yes but you did not answer my question. Do tapes interpret?
January 02, 2017 at 04:11
Do you agree that tapes do not have minds and thus do not interpret what is being measured? If so wouldn't you agree that is the very reason for using...
January 02, 2017 at 03:45
No I measure with a tape, which does not have a mind. What that tape will measure does not depend on it's mind, it has none, so it does not interpret ...
January 02, 2017 at 03:38
I am 6 ft tall in the sense that this is what I will measure. Others, nor myself, cannot simply decide that this is not what I will measure. It is not...
January 02, 2017 at 03:22
It is not voluntary that I measure 6 ft, whether I measure or someone else does.
January 02, 2017 at 03:17
When I am measured.
January 02, 2017 at 03:14
I am 6 ft tall though.
January 02, 2017 at 03:11
I don't think that should be controversial. Everybody is irrational to some degree, we all suffer from cognitive biases. Nobody is completely rational...
January 02, 2017 at 02:14
I could argue that the RNC was stacked against Trump. But he still won the nomination. I don't understand why it is cheating to win more delegates tha...
January 02, 2017 at 00:41