You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

jkg20

Comments

As far as I understand it - for Kant, the "thing in itself" is definitely not to be equated with God. However, I suppose there may be Kantians who mig...
April 09, 2018 at 10:54
How one should live? and if God exists? What's the relation? Well, and this is definitely not Spinoza's position, if you thought you could prove that ...
April 09, 2018 at 10:46
If we see something blurred as opposed to clearly, or as you suggest through a filter of some kind, I admit there is a good deal of motivation - indep...
April 09, 2018 at 10:35
Thanks, but no need to apologise, my question was probably a little too basic for this technical thread anyway, so I started another one specifically ...
April 09, 2018 at 09:46
I'm not sure why Spinoza chose the title "The Ethics" for his work, but it is above all a work of metaphysics. As far as I understand him, though, he ...
April 08, 2018 at 13:15
Common sense is right about the feather and the iron ball, at least insofar as dropping them from the top of the tower of Pisa is concerned. Of course...
April 08, 2018 at 08:12
Thanks for this post, which I found enlightening. I'd often suspected that there was something circular in Dennett's position. Doesn't he try to disso...
April 08, 2018 at 08:00
For attempts to argue for God's existence, you could do worse (at least in my opinion) that to read Descartes' Meditations (from memory the arguments ...
April 08, 2018 at 07:39
"Well, it actually does matter if something is caused by a psychoactive substance or not." Why? The question I'm interested in is the one Procastinati...
April 07, 2018 at 13:23
This may be off-topic to some extent, but is there a link here to the position in the philsophy of mind called adverbialism? From what I gather, the i...
April 07, 2018 at 12:27
:up:
April 07, 2018 at 10:54
I agree the author of the article seems to be a bit of a crank (seems he or she thinks he or she can prove god exists for one thing). Having said that...
April 07, 2018 at 10:53
Isn't it? I would have thought physicists wouldn't be too happy to be told that when they talk about electrons etc that they are not talking about rea...
April 07, 2018 at 10:41
Thanks Akanthinos and Ying for the explanations and pointers to further reading. Not that I'm taking any sides here - but what about this unfocussed a...
April 07, 2018 at 10:37
A mistake people are making about Descartes (it seems to me) in much of the discussion so far is that he took his cogito to be a deductive argument. W...
April 04, 2018 at 17:12
Some of what this Cogitson is saying sounds like the kind of arguments Berkeley gave for his empirical idealism (you might already have read Three Dia...
April 04, 2018 at 16:42
Not much of a philosophical argument. As for Corvus , that's not much of an argument either, although at least it has a premise and a conclusion, even...
April 04, 2018 at 16:30
Thanks apokrisis for the detailed reply. I have a couple of points/questions: 1: Isn't that precisely the kind of view that the author of the article ...
April 04, 2018 at 16:20
In the article I linked to it seems pretty clear that the author is talking about that part of commonsense that views the world as populated with colo...
April 03, 2018 at 20:19
I think the realist you are talking about has at a bare minimum just four metaphysical commitments: 1) that there are things that perceive 2) that the...
April 02, 2018 at 22:05