You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Metaphysician Undercover

Comments

They only appear as "unfalsifiable" because you have not defined your terms, "God", "exist". Once you provide clear definitions you'll see what I mean...
December 30, 2020 at 04:29
None of these qualify as an "unprovable" inductive conclusions, or universals, which is the substance here. One could make up all sorts of nonsense an...
December 30, 2020 at 00:29
Banno seems to think that a proposition can be claimed as "unfalsifiable" without proving that it is unfalsifiable. But this is just a ploy to avoid h...
December 29, 2020 at 13:16
As I explained, these two are contradictory. Unfalsifiable means impossible to falsify, which implies necessarily true, therefore proven.
December 29, 2020 at 12:48
This is how the problem of induction is resolved. It appears like an inductive conclusion cannot be proven. But an inductive truth is impossible to fa...
December 29, 2020 at 03:10
I have nothing against "natural logical structure in communication". But we cannot conclude that natural logical structure implies rules, just because...
December 29, 2020 at 02:25
As I said, I don't believe there is such a thing as the rules of semantics. You can keep talking as if you believe that there is, but that won't chang...
December 29, 2020 at 00:14
The point remains the same, even if you express it in this way. All that meaning between 1 and 0 cannot be expressed in the digital system. Right, tha...
December 28, 2020 at 22:24
The entire universe is involved in self-organization? I thought only living things did this.
December 28, 2020 at 21:58
Right, that's why I said what "information" refers to in information theory is something completely different from what "information" refers to in muc...
December 28, 2020 at 13:14
If that is your view, and belief, how do you account for all that meaning which is excluded as not meaningful, by that position, as I explained above?...
December 28, 2020 at 02:15
I really don't believe that thinking can be identified with being in this way. This is because "being", though the "ing" signifies an activity, is rea...
December 28, 2020 at 02:02
How would you separate "hardwired tendencies" from conscious thinking habits which are learned at a very young age. Perhaps it's the case that all pre...
December 28, 2020 at 01:40
But do they? Or, do you really believe this? What I've been trying to tell you, is that the binary system is really a great restriction to meaning. It...
December 28, 2020 at 01:18
The problem is, that you must be sure that the correct answer is amongst the options, or else the question is not necessarily a valid representation. ...
December 27, 2020 at 19:56
Right, and thought is always directed toward some want or desire, indicating that something is lacking, so the more appropriate argument would be I th...
December 27, 2020 at 15:26
I don't see how you can describe that as a matter of reducing specificity for an increase in generality. It's the very opposite of that. Reducing the ...
December 27, 2020 at 13:31
I think you must have misunderstood. If you perceive a contradiction, then point it out to me so I can see what you're talking about, and maybe clarif...
December 27, 2020 at 02:24
The information is "it rained in the Sahara", just like in the other instance, the information is "it rained in Oxford". How is whether or not this is...
December 26, 2020 at 16:23
As I pointed out, the surprisingness is only related to external information concerning the frequency of rain in these places, it has nothing to do wi...
December 26, 2020 at 13:39
I believe the man was a psychological genius, but is largely ignored as such.
December 26, 2020 at 13:21
In: Brexit  — view comment
Long live the Commonwealth!
December 26, 2020 at 13:11
I don't think this is a valid conclusion. It rained in Oxford has the same degree of information as does it rained in the Sahara. The "shock/surprise ...
December 26, 2020 at 12:53
The "limits of reason" is not the issue here.
December 25, 2020 at 22:24
I don't think they're hypocrites, that's why I objected to your representation, which appeared to represent them as hypocrites. When someone enters a ...
December 25, 2020 at 22:23
We could say the same thing about tim as well. Boy this thread has degenerated. A true representation of its title.
December 25, 2020 at 12:47
The point is, that such an admonishment is an intellectualization itself. Therefore presenting this as you do, is to represent Buddhism as hypocritica...
December 24, 2020 at 19:12
Nice article Wayfarer. It describes how what is foundational, or basic to communication is uncertainty. This is contrary to what many on this forum ar...
December 24, 2020 at 14:29
Why do you describe the content of thought as "incorrect understandings". Do you think that thought is necessarily wrong?
December 24, 2020 at 14:03
In metaphysics there are two distinct customary ways (sets of conditions) for violating the law of excluded middle, one is neither is, nor is not, the...
December 24, 2020 at 14:01
You didn't say it, but you implied that. I can't say that I know all the precepts of Buddhism, but I really do not think that it provides you with the...
December 24, 2020 at 13:06
We are inclined toward things which have value. And it's the rare things which have high value.
December 24, 2020 at 01:21
You must have missed my posts then. I was trying to determine whether the person's action, of burning the book, demonstrated a valid point. First I sa...
December 23, 2020 at 14:59
Why "process"? Do you deny the possibility of a static relationship? Are not the relationships between 1 and 2, 2 and 3, etc., static? How is Joe's we...
December 23, 2020 at 13:51
I "don't get it" because it's so blatantly illogical, and I can't believe that you could call this logic. I was naively hoping that you might be able ...
December 23, 2020 at 13:36
There is just as much necessity to determine where the wise man goes wrong, as there is a necessity to follow the direction of the wise. No one is cap...
December 23, 2020 at 13:29
I can't believe you call that logic. Logic is supposed to rule out other possibilities, not simply ignore them. Your premises are sorely lacking. That...
December 23, 2020 at 12:47
Are you saying that all relations are causal? What about something like Joe is heavier than Ron? Isn't that information which is not a matter of causa...
December 23, 2020 at 01:58
Right, the symptoms which are observed are the effect of the underlying condition, and the event is a sort of trigger. The trigger is not the cause, a...
December 22, 2020 at 13:46
So, let me give you an example of the ambiguity then. See the ambiguity in your usage? You start out by saying information is in the complex thing. Th...
December 22, 2020 at 13:27
That's the malarkey right here. When have I ever said anything even remotely like what you quote me as saying? It doesn't even sound like anything I w...
December 22, 2020 at 12:36
I believe our society has a tendency to streamline normalcy more than what might be necessary. So students are funneled through a narrow passageway. T...
December 22, 2020 at 03:05
Here's an unorthodox way of looking at intuition. Intuition is like an inner voice, which inspires one to act in any particular way; the actions might...
December 21, 2020 at 14:05
This is a key point which I made earlier in the thread. You say "these are of a negative nature", referring to these thoughts, or "voices". But we nee...
December 21, 2020 at 13:48
"Information" Is an ambiguous term which allows the modern materialist, or physicalist, through the use of illusion, to escape the need for God in met...
December 21, 2020 at 13:22
Oh yeah, after the thousands of lies that Trump has made while in office never lost him any support, what's going to change now?
December 21, 2020 at 04:01
The fact that some people are worried that a vaccine might cause an autoimmune disease, does not constitute a logical relationship between vaccines an...
December 21, 2020 at 03:32
The god of the Old Testament is definitely described as jealous on a number of occasions. That's why we wants Abraham's people, the Hebrews, to worshi...
December 21, 2020 at 03:04
I went through the article quickly to get the gist of it, and I find it a good comparison. But I don't accept Hegel's dialectics of sublation. I don't...
December 20, 2020 at 23:00
Subitism is an excellent topic for a thread of its own. It figures prominently into Wittgenstein's "Philosophical Investigations" but remains unexplai...
December 20, 2020 at 13:38