Yet we don't need to talk about the computer telling the story. For all its of-then statements are programmed consciously by a programmer, and realize...
I would argue that direct information exchange is the pinnacle. Telling a story suggests other connotations, the weaving together of something which m...
But one can have an a-utility understanding. For example: you understand that Gandalf loves his Hobbits. This is true understanding, but it is also us...
I get what you're saying. I mean, I'm ignorant of interpretive dance and I don't really feel a great need to not be ignorant of it. Same with Baseball...
You just won Philosophy. I think that existing-thinking implies existence. Existence implies being. Being implies the ability to be. This doesn't impl...
This is a fresh thread of thought, thank you very much for that. In another forum I mentioned wanting to think about an objective definition for philo...
Respectfully disagreed. Absolute is not the same as total; you conflate absolute with total. Total refers to the whole of the thing. "Ignorance is tot...
I generally agree with you. Actually, I'd say both kinds of knowledge are important. We need some specialists and some generalists. And when we have a...
It's interesting that I don't find much of what you said disagreeable, Wayfarer, but I do consider myself to be part of that analytic philosophy camp ...
Your sentiment is echoed in one of my favorite band's song "Kill your idols" "Cosmetic photogenic This pain is fleeting, ring out Mechanical the passi...
Hey man, we all do philosophy our own way. I don't dislike getting intuitive responses, but forgive me I can only do analytic philosophy. I think phil...
I would agree that ignorance isn't useless. But perfect ignorance doesn't work this way. As a philosopher I come to understand that I am very ignoranc...
If the brain is a composite of parts exchanging information cyclically, it's difficult to gauge where one process ends and other begins. I have an ong...
Comments