You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

tom

Comments

Do you think Islamic states kill apostates, kill atheists, kill blasphemers, kill witches, kill gays ... because they are states or because they are I...
April 03, 2017 at 16:19
Alternatively, you could just try to give a talk against FGM and violence towards women in AUSTRALIA and see what happens.
April 03, 2017 at 11:54
Here's another limelighting uncle tom: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fr47iC-VnE4
April 03, 2017 at 11:18
Meanwhile, let us spare a thought for this guy, sentenced to death for something he said on social media when he was 19: http://www.independent.co.uk/...
April 03, 2017 at 10:59
Seems like an accurate precis to me! Interestingly, while Muslims protect their religion through violence, the Left defends Islam by labeling its crit...
April 03, 2017 at 09:02
Are you sure? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-39475462 Another victory for the "Religion of Peace".
April 03, 2017 at 06:55
This Imam has the answers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vp_1JvRsCYE
April 02, 2017 at 15:58
The clue is in the Modal Realism and the Quantum Mechanics. If the statement agrees with the laws of physics, it is true - there is a world in which i...
April 02, 2017 at 13:36
I'm solving your problem, or rather Modal Realism and Quantum Mechanics are independently solving your problem, and many other problems.
April 02, 2017 at 13:16
Translating the statement slightly: "In all the worlds where I opened the box at earlier time t, I discovered the cat to be dead" Is a false statement...
April 02, 2017 at 12:16
Or you could just stick to Unitary Quantum Mechanics, and you can keep your determinism, solve the problem of counterfactuals, explain probability, di...
April 02, 2017 at 11:56
The laws of nature state that deterministically, that is only "half" the story. "Half" being used as shorthand for the proportion determined by the la...
April 02, 2017 at 11:53
Please don't abandon reason! You just need to index yourself against the outcome of a quantum measurement. The subjective perspective of a particular ...
April 02, 2017 at 11:38
It depends how precise you insist on being with your language and the particular history you are in. The laws of physics state that the proportion of ...
April 02, 2017 at 11:33
For any statement to be true, it must agree with the laws of physics. This goes for factual and counterfactual statements.
April 02, 2017 at 11:09
Let's ignore verification, which is irrelevant and impossible, but the counterfactual nature of falsification is even worse (or better if you like the...
April 02, 2017 at 11:05
It's called decoherence.
April 01, 2017 at 22:30
Maybe you think you are in charge, or that physics doesn't apply to you because you are special? For the rest of us, Unitary Quantum Mechanics solves ...
April 01, 2017 at 22:29
I don't think you have exhausted all possibilities there. You may have noticed that our best physical theories do not mention causation. They can't be...
April 01, 2017 at 22:24
Perhaps it would be better to frame the experiment explicitly in terms of a particle whose spin is prepared in superposition? According to the laws of...
April 01, 2017 at 21:59
Could you point out where in the Bible sex tourism is promoted? I notice that you didn't employ the obvious reply of asking me to point out the verses...
April 01, 2017 at 14:59
Could you point to the verses in the Bible that promote sex-tourism?
April 01, 2017 at 14:22
If you are into paedophilia, beating your wife, and sex-slavery maybe you should.
April 01, 2017 at 14:12
So you admit to being more concerned with the irrelevancy of to whom I prefer to apportion blame, than to the atrocity of Islamic practice. Now that w...
April 01, 2017 at 13:31
I see. You are more concerned with who I choose to blame than solving a growing problem. Who I choose to blame is irrelevant. The only way to progress...
April 01, 2017 at 00:16
The only way to bring an end to any destructive inhumane ideology is to subject it to criticism. In Canada, that is now a crime. In UK it is a crime. ...
March 31, 2017 at 23:46
It is alarming that you think that finding that list of atrocities abhorrent needs defending. The very definition of an apologist.
March 31, 2017 at 23:18
Maybe we could clarify matters by listing the religions that encourage: 1. Death to apostates. 2, Death to atheists. 3. Death to homosexuals. 4. Death...
March 31, 2017 at 21:51
Islam allows the rape of children. Their perfect moral example married a 6yr old. What has abhorrence at such behaviour got to do with atheism?
March 31, 2017 at 21:34
I think these days you have to append -icism otherwise you are racist. I presume you support death to apostates and atheists?
March 31, 2017 at 19:54
I think this is a bit cheap. Any decent theory of cosmology will, in the long run, have to take account of what sentient knowledge-bearing entities, f...
March 31, 2017 at 13:28
OK, but the list of laws that underlie chemistry are universal, plus there are the universal constants and the non-universal initial conditions of the...
March 31, 2017 at 13:08
Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that SOME of the laws of chemistry are approximations?
March 31, 2017 at 09:30
Actually, you can't reduce chemistry to quantum mechanics. Chemistry is highly dependent on the history of the universe and the particular values of c...
March 31, 2017 at 07:04
None of the theories I mentioned seeks to protect itself from falsification by the adoption of any ad-hoc restrictions on where and when they might ap...
March 30, 2017 at 11:47
I think this misses the point. Explanations at any level of emergence can be fundamental. We think of quantum mechanics and general relativity as "fun...
March 30, 2017 at 07:35
Which one of those requires superstrings as part of the explanation? Quarks?
March 29, 2017 at 15:03
But there is another error of reductionism, which maybe even deeper: the misconception that our theories form a hierarchy.
March 29, 2017 at 14:44
A good example of this is the theory of Computation, specifically the theory of computational universality. Computational Universality cannot be deduc...
March 29, 2017 at 13:53
It's quite simple: A theory that explains sets of phenomena in their own terms, without analysing them into their constituent entities such as gluons,...
March 29, 2017 at 13:41
Given that you have purposefully left out the beginning of the sura, which explicitly states that the verse is about the Jews, I've got to ask: What a...
March 29, 2017 at 09:33
It's also a lie. Or to be more specific, it is taqiya. This is Quran 5:32 Quran 5:32 is about the Jews! Next of course is Quran 5:33 Beautiful?
March 29, 2017 at 09:28
It really hasn't. DNA replication in the biosphere involves animal behaviour: finding a mate, being sexually selected, fighting off rivals, creating a...
March 29, 2017 at 07:32
In 1095 you say? Meanwhile in Muslim countries, atheists are killed, children are raped, homosexuals are thrown from high places. In the putative Cali...
March 28, 2017 at 19:54
Nevertheless the fact remains that in the 21st century, people are put to death for questioning Islam.
March 28, 2017 at 15:22
It would be wrong. The niche of these genes also includes animal behaviour. As to what is encoded in the genes, as I have already alluded to, it is in...
March 28, 2017 at 14:54
For your benefit, I'll point out the distinction between a methodology and the misconception that higher level explanations cannot be fundamental.
March 28, 2017 at 14:41
...that encode the information required for them to remain instantiated in their niche. Would be more accurate I think.
March 28, 2017 at 14:38
Here it is again: http://www.daviddeutsch.org.uk/wp-content/deutsch85.pdf This paper is more accessible: http://www.daviddeutsch.org.uk/wp-content/ItF...
March 28, 2017 at 14:32
I'm not concerned so much about resisting reductionism in this case, as being wrong. Given any particular gene, it can be sequenced. The sequence can ...
March 28, 2017 at 14:25