ProgrammingGodJordan

I'd already approached that type of query, amidst this thread.

My writing persists, regardless of belief.

I didn't merely provide one paper (although the paper I linked to contains multiple references). I also provided a link to "non-beliefism", which cons...

Your response above is typical, it's a common type of response that I encountered when I initially began to discuss "non-beliefism" in 2016. Such a ty...

That you fail to acknowledge evidence, does not suddenly warrant that evidence is invalid.

I don't detect the relevance of your quote above to the OP. Nowhere in the OP (or throughout our discussion) did I advocate scientific proof as you de...

Religious faith is not-scientifically founded, and this is not up to me.

1.This was already covered in the Op; I already underlined that belief may occur both on evidence, and non-evidence. However, it is notable, that beli...

a. Your argument above originates from a trivial error. b. That science prioritizes evidence, obtains regardless of anyone's belief, contrary to your ...

Good, because that is what the OP talks about; science is such that prioritizes evidence, whereas belief does not. As for your latter query, one can b...

Consider this past sequence: 1.a) My words: "belief typically facilitates that people especially ignore evidence." 1.b) Notably, my words above are de...

1. On the contrary, your "correction" does not apply, and your words are ironically invalid, for "proof" and "evidence" are quite literally synonymous...

I don't detect the relevance of your response above wrt the OP.

https://i.imgur.com/qx56j06.jpg Non-beliefism underlines, that "one may rank his/her presentations as incomplete expressions (susceptible to future an...

Simply, science prioritizes evidence, while belief (by definition and research) is a model that does not prioritize evidence. Unless belief is redefin...

Yes, it is quite clear you merely glanced the paper; for the paper did not end with the early description you posted (where they admit "there is no ph...

In stark contrast, as I mentioned prior, gravitational theory is empirically observable: Reference A: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empirical_evidence...

On the contrary, because science prioritizes evidence, while belief does not, we actually can avoid belief, i.e. we can avoid failure to prioritize ev...

I thank you.

1. I was not the one who spoke about scientific proof, user "JustSomeGuy" is the one that tried to confluence proof (which differs from scientific pro...

Simply: 1. Science is a model that prioritizes evidence. 2. Belief (by definition and research) is a model that does not prioritize evidence. (Priorit...

1. I didn't say that proof and evidence were not synonymous. 2. I'd carefully read your earlier response, so I advise that you also carefully read onc...

Why don't you wish for aging to be solved?

I don't detect the relevance of your question.

1. Belief, (by definition and research) is contrary to the definition that you manufactured above: https://i.imgur.com/GrMF2dg.png 2. Ignoring the def...

1. No, I don't detect that I have confused "practical belief" with "religious faith"; in fact, I had long encountered scientism, which is near to the ...

1. Your prior response was invalid, as it attempted to confluence scientific proof, and proof. 2. In my stating the synonyms: proof, evidence, I simpl...

As I had underlined in the OP, I hadn't scrutinized belief for quite a long while, so like you I had been accustomed to it. However, with a bit of foc...

1. On the contrary, see scientific research, showing that belief generally permits ignorance of evidence. 2. Notably, there is a difference between sc...

1. What "high hanging fruit" has been offered by the others? 2. Yes, that flat earthers exist, does not invalidate gravitational theory. Likewise, it ...

1. As you are quite accustomed to belief, I see that it may be difficult to detach yourself from it. 2. It is probable that you are male, and so on. 3...

https://i.imgur.com/OOMM5z1.jpg 1. Some empirically observable thing is Gravitational theory. 2. There exists people that believe that the earth is su...

It is somewhat tiring when people bring up scienticism when I describe "non beliefism", because as an atheist, I had long encountered scienticism. Any...

Where?

Why do you garner that belief is unavoidable?

1. In contrast, as underlined in the OP: One may believe in both evidence, and non-evidence. (i.e. there are valid beliefs in science) Despite the abo...

1. Why would using standard definitions supposedly be "the genesis of my issues"? 2. Also, don't forget the latter part of my earlier response:

1. In contrast, I refer to standard definitions: https://i.imgur.com/gZM9ghb.png 2. By extension, research shows that beliefs typically occur on non-e...

1. I already underlined that one may believe in evidence in the OP: https://i.imgur.com/4XhvtwM.png 2. By extension, that one may believe in science, ...

What possible relevance does that have to this discussion? You should be addressing my statements. Whether you are theistic or not, shall probably aff...

Why do you garner you must believe, in order to observe that science prioritizes evidence, whereas belief, by definition/research permits typical igno...

The OP underlined that AGI/ASI is reasonably human-cognitive exceeding in nature, and thus the OP underlines humans are reasonably not the central foc...

No.

Are you theistic by chance? 1. True definition:"in accordance with fact or reality." 2. So, Neil deGrasse Tyson is demonstrably correct, science is tr...

1. Your words: "Again, it underlies all forms of thought; it underlies "scientific thinking" (whatever that is), in evidence, rational arguments. Ther...

1.Your words: "Your belief in non-beliefism is noted. Of course, you would not believe your belief to be self-contradictory..." 2. My response: Your r...

1. Your words: "So we ought believe the evidence?" 2. My response: The evidence persists regardless of belief.

1. I don't detect any novel information from those threads. I've been discussing "non-beliefism" online since 2016, so I've seen many similar response...

1.Your words: "If you're going to bring an argument to the table, you ned to engage in a detailed defense, instead of just rehashing talking points. S...

1. Your words: "What about the belief that belief should be abolished, should that belief be abolished too? Thus, this thread should be abolished." 2....