You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Copernicus

Comments

This is hopeless.
October 12, 2025 at 06:46
Pardon?
October 12, 2025 at 06:42
Then you'd need to understand the difference between philosophy, doctrine, law, evidence, science, etc.
October 11, 2025 at 22:34
Elaborate, please.
October 11, 2025 at 22:28
In the realm of science. Or at least the books we read. Don't tell me you're planning to bring solipsism (a philosophy) into science or court ("your h...
October 11, 2025 at 22:26
Yes. Newton believed light wasn't a wave. He was proven wrong. I can be proven wrong. But from my equations, I'm pretty solid on my conclusion. Might ...
October 11, 2025 at 22:23
That sounds like a charge without evidence. To see what you mean. Perhaps you meant your way of thinking?
October 11, 2025 at 22:18
define it
October 11, 2025 at 22:12
I go to the grocery store to get fruits. Do I need to marry the cashier for that? What's wrong with self-serving social interactions?
October 11, 2025 at 22:12
Looks like @"Banno" has a personal vendetta for me being a radical individualist while him being a communitarian.
October 11, 2025 at 22:08
Looks like papers won't cut it. Need a book to cover everything. I don't think I quite caught what you meant.
October 11, 2025 at 22:06
No, I don't. Where was my question wrong? Yes, to myself. I wrote and sang a song for you by myself. You're free to give feedback. Yes, I'm forced to ...
October 11, 2025 at 22:00
I'm not in the mood for trolling, so I'd ask you politely to either get serious or find a different discussion.
October 11, 2025 at 21:49
ISN'T THAT WHAT PHILOSOPHY IS? Unless we're talking math (or science), my arguments don't have to be universally accepted. Philosophy is a higher form...
October 11, 2025 at 21:48
(a+b)^2 might have been a2+2.0045ab+b2 in some corner of the universe, but from our observation (practicality) or mathematical equations (theory), we ...
October 11, 2025 at 21:46
That's not the point. We're not separating anyone. I just said humans are programmed to be selfish. If some physical properties manage to be selfless,...
October 11, 2025 at 21:44
You're now swimming in solipsism. I don't see any point in arguing if you'd deviate from the OP.
October 11, 2025 at 21:41
Agnostics are skeptical about God; Solipsists are skeptical about Reality. No accepting, no denying. Just skeptical.
October 11, 2025 at 21:40
Don't remember when I ever was. No. What I argued was that you can't betray your self. Nothing more. Solipsism isn't even involved in this.
October 11, 2025 at 21:35
Your version of solipsism is not the one I follow. Something like anarchism vs libertarianism vs liberalism. Close, but different.
October 11, 2025 at 21:34
I never know FOR SURE. That's the idea. No accepting, no denying.
October 11, 2025 at 21:32
From my argumentative conclusion, all people are, and it's impossible not to be.
October 11, 2025 at 21:30
I'd like to know where it went wrong.
October 11, 2025 at 21:28
Again, people, this argument (OP) is not based on solipsism. Don't get distracted.
October 11, 2025 at 21:27
That's the general way of arguing. (Like, "you can't see a young lady and lose your composure."..."you" doesn't mean you in specific.) Nope. I'm intak...
October 11, 2025 at 21:26
I answered it here:
October 11, 2025 at 21:21
As a reference or background intro music. This argument isn't based on solipsism. Don't get distracted.
October 11, 2025 at 21:20
I see solipsism as the idea that we know nothing outside our heads, which creates the outside experience for us. Whether my yellow is your yellow, or ...
October 11, 2025 at 21:18
That's just one aspect of solipsism. I take it as an initial chamber. Which leads to the understanding that no matter what the truth is, you would nev...
October 11, 2025 at 21:13
The only selfless act would be when you deny yourself gratification, gain, achievement, everything, including your decision to deny self-interest to a...
October 11, 2025 at 21:12
Reality is subjective, dependent upon stimulus reception and intellectual perception.
October 11, 2025 at 21:05
Depends on perspective.
October 11, 2025 at 21:04
No, and no. I'm selfish. (P.S. I did read) As a solipsist, that's the core of my worldview.
October 11, 2025 at 21:01
@"Outlander" was right. You seem to fail to grasp it.
October 11, 2025 at 20:59
I fail to see where that's my problem. I do.
October 11, 2025 at 20:57
No. Exactly. Everything is about that one way or another. The self. Not. No one escapes it.
October 11, 2025 at 20:55
You serve your vision of a better world.
October 11, 2025 at 20:51
Care to elaborate?
October 11, 2025 at 18:20
Since I never said the intangible characteristics are direct elements of the physical universe, and that they're rather products or byproducts of phys...
October 11, 2025 at 18:19
Too ambiguous.
October 11, 2025 at 18:14
What would your proposed word be?
October 11, 2025 at 18:12
Whatever you choose ultimately serves your self. You choose which is the higher calling for you (eating—desire, packs—health). And each of the options...
October 11, 2025 at 18:02
Selfishness is self-interest (serving the self, whether by violating other selves or not, or whether putting others above, below, or at equal level or...
October 11, 2025 at 17:51
If he has XY chromosomes, yes.
October 11, 2025 at 16:42
Yes, but I don't support the idea of unions, especially the involuntary ones. Same as the social contract. That's the natural transgenderism. Must be ...
October 11, 2025 at 16:39
No offense, but that's horseshit. And as a radical individualist, I don't believe in community or culture. Transgender is having both male and female ...
October 11, 2025 at 16:27
I don't agree with this view. I have individual freedom to wear what I want, unless I'm breaking laws or protocols. My gender is solely tied to my sex...
October 11, 2025 at 16:17
How is cultural expression "gender"? I think you coined the definition yourself. If society can't force expectations on you, can you force definitions...
October 11, 2025 at 16:05
Yes. To me,men and women are sex. And what you designated as gender could be termed as hormonal traits.
October 11, 2025 at 15:59
Oh boy... we're differentiating sex from gender. I see. Well, apologies for wasting your time. I hope you find your answers.
October 11, 2025 at 15:52