Deleted User

Are you saying: that it is impossible to understand this thing we humans named reality? that only cranks and monomaniacs can understand this thing we ...

In my opinion, a spot-on description. Thank you

Please, if a system is all about stabilising instability, where does instability come from? Also, is it not true that "instability" is the root cause ...

Please, in terms of your "bare bones", is it possible for to be a system?

In my opinion: interactions without components makes no sense at all. Neither does components without interactions. Please, what would entail a "metap...

Thank you for your frank and honest input - this is a good description, one that is generally accepted by the 'systems-thinkers'. But it has a few pro...

You answer thus, then, seemingly, concede to my point:

This definition looks very similar to one that has been published in 1923 by Lewis, C.I. Facts, Systems and the Unity of the World. The Journal of Phi...

Please explain then, in terms of your definition, how to determine what is part of the system, and what is part of the environment? To my understandin...

I don't think systems <=> coherencies is any definition.

These "irreducible entities", is that the fundamental particle that the physicist are trying to find?

I agree with your definition, even though I have used some different words. Do you know of any theory that backs up this definition?

Thank you for your contribution - I was hoping for a concise definition backed by a general systems theory. Notions of systems are a dime a dozen

My understanding is that Luhmann worked on social systems, thus not a general systems theory

And, did you discovered a new world? I did!. For example: The emergence of wealth <=> technology predate the emergence of modern Homo sapiens. Thus al...

"You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore." ... and good luck to you.

Below is a summary of my work, surely you could glean my line of thought from it: Chapter 1 - The Problem The basic problem is that after 2,600 years ...

@"Tom Storm" & @"Gnomon" I can provide snippets and quotes from my work as much as I like, you will not see the 'full picture' from this quotes, thus ...

I have no issue with Ervin Laszlo's problem identification. I've had some communications with the Laszlo family (Erwin and Alexander) - they seem to b...

Methinks you are short-selling yourself. Moreover, giving up without trying will bring you nowhere. Yes, it would seem that my definition of philosoph...

I have stated, categorically, in my opening statement, that I am not au fait with the 'ism' and 'ology' languages - however, I am pretty convinced tha...

Your logic is most impressive - a prime example of excellent philosophical reasoning.

No, I do not blame philosophy for all the problems of the world and no, I do not think some "holistic/systems philosophy" will cure any ills of we hum...

As for the rest of the discussion, I can only give the following "two naive but fundamental logical statements: 1. Attempting to define or study any a...

I have sent a contact request to your academia link. I can post a sentence or even a paragraph summary of any of my concepts - it will only be a few p...

I will try my very best to respond encouraging enough - I don't meditate nor do drugs either - rather play chess. Your *1 Thank you for putting this o...

"He that will not reason is a bigot; he that cannot reason is a fool; and he that dares not reason is a slave." William Drummond To which I would add;...

Thank you for this - yes it would seem some are still stuck in Plato's cave watching the shadows play out against an empty wall.

I suggest you stay in your cave and watch the shadows play out against the empty wall. From the "troll spammer."

No. I am looking for a reader that can think outside the box, who reads and understand my theory then helps me find a possible fatal flaw in my reason...

Thank you for your welcome, I do appreciate it. I do not have any issue with the substantial contribution that philosophy has made on the progress of ...

No problem - I am trying to find a reader that could think outside the box and with the capability of understanding what I have written and (most impo...

It would be awesome if you could understand it - I am looking for the "fatal flaw" in my understanding. I am not sure what you mean by "elite class", ...

You are absolutely on the right track: "Our reality consist of systems: 1. Real systems - consisting of perceived, measurable mass or energy. 2. Abstr...

You certainly seem to be obfuscated, my foundation is an understanding of systems (something, it would seem, you have no understanding of), defined fr...

I agree with you: "Who am 'I' and what is the relation between mind and body? According to my understanding, there exists a specific, changeable state...

"... consciousness is the ability of a functional brain, capable of abstract thought, to manage itself. We could agree that the human brain manages th...

In conclusion to this discussion then: Philosophy have no defence against "The only results I see from philosophy are a world in which we are: unable ...

If I understand your prose correctly, you agree with my problem statement. 'Please consider the following two naive but fundamentally logical statemen...

My agreement, or not; whether the WW2 Nazi's were the "bad guys", or not; is irrelevant to my problem statement. Please consider: 'Any decision on wha...

Another unanswered question, yet you maintain that my generalisation that war is a problem that has not been solved by 2,600 years of philosophical ef...

You did not answer my questions, why? Then, why would I consult philosophy to get to the bottom of this issue; after 2,600 years of philosophical ende...

I think both sides, in any war, think they are fighting "the good fight".

From you assertion: Since no rational person, even with the necessary authority, will declare any war on any particular occasion, unless he/she believ...

And no matter how many times you promote your Strawman fallacy, that some wars are 'good' because some pain is 'good', you have not convinced me, nor ...

Perhaps a bold claim: "Existence := Defined by the Argument of Existence. The argument that things includes mass or energy or that a thing is perceive...

I have addressed the point you made. I am patiently waiting for you to explain to the thousands killed in the Gaza war that their deaths was for a goo...

In my problem statement I made the following two statements: 1. For more than 2,600 years philosophers have studied and contributed to our knowledge a...

Please, what other things could be deduced from the two fundamentally true statements? These discussions included the input from philosophers, not so?...

So noted, thank you.