You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Larynx

['Member']Joined: January 03, 2018 at 17:56Last active: May 17, 2018 at 18:52None discussions17 comments

Comments

Yeah, I think that's a good way to put it. They are often very clever, usually well-read folks; at the same time they are emotionally stunted in more ...
April 15, 2018 at 02:48
Parts of this article are interesting - as a currently practicing academic I am sympathetic to aspects of this but hesitant on others. To be sure: the...
April 13, 2018 at 19:26
Just a quick note: "command system" isn't really a widely used definitional approach - certainly not on a philosophical level (academically or otherwi...
March 13, 2018 at 10:56
Ah, you referenced Bernie Sanders so I assumed you were from the US. In either case, the statement still applies. Canada's taxation as a percentage of...
March 12, 2018 at 21:40
There's an odd contradiction here. On the one hand, I get sense that you are concerned about the recent tendency to label a variety of disparate posit...
March 12, 2018 at 08:08
Honestly, I think the approach you ended up taking is exactly right, or more appropriate to the actual "doing" of philosophy at the very least. "Toolk...
March 11, 2018 at 19:09
I am going to firmly disagree with that. Back in 2011 or 2012, right around the time the second edition came out, I was TAing a class that used that a...
March 10, 2018 at 20:28
Obviously we do not have a definitive answer to those questions (in fact these days the "ideal society question is pretty silly amongst political phil...
March 09, 2018 at 20:35
That's probably not true. A lot of Marx's thought is incredibly systematic, rigorously historical, and well thought out. The piece referenced in this ...
March 07, 2018 at 16:45
There are a few different things going on in this selection and the text as a whole. You're probably not wrong to say we're "swept along" in a natural...
March 07, 2018 at 03:37
You know, it's funny: when I started teaching ethics a few years ago I was quite a bit more in favor of consequentialist approaches and the standard m...
January 07, 2018 at 05:42
Well it's not the hypothetical nature of the trolley problem that I believe bothers most critics - as I mentioned it's the distance from more common r...
January 06, 2018 at 20:33
Thank you, I appreciate it. Without going into too much excruciating detail: I'm in academia; I am currently a research fellow and lecturer for a univ...
January 06, 2018 at 11:51
One of my undergraduate degrees and of one my master's degrees were in philosophy. Honestly it's an incredibly useful field, but was not sustainable i...
January 06, 2018 at 11:19
Given the heavily religious overtones of both of those blogs and the leading structure of the question, I'm going to selectively choose to read your q...
January 06, 2018 at 10:57
I suppose that's true, but only in a sense. Again we're mostly back to square one if we're talking about generals and civilian killing zones, eh? How ...
January 04, 2018 at 10:53
Not to de-rail (no pun intended) this discussion at all, but a noteworthy point here: these sorts of thought experiments are under fire by some contem...
January 03, 2018 at 18:19