You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wallace Murphree

['Member']Joined: August 05, 2024 at 16:59Last active: August 21, 2024 at 20:241 discussions7 comments

Discussions (1)

Comments

In: "ReasonLines" to determine validity in categorical logic  — view comment
@leontiskos Re: ReasonLines.Com I appreciate that some have looked at and commented on the ReasonLines program; however, I realize I have not provided...
August 14, 2024 at 19:28
In: "ReasonLines" to determine validity in categorical logic  — view comment
@"tim wood" I should have tagged you in a post above.
August 11, 2024 at 12:27
In: "ReasonLines" to determine validity in categorical logic  — view comment
@"Lionino" Thanks!
August 11, 2024 at 12:25
In: "ReasonLines" to determine validity in categorical logic  — view comment
Being older?? I was born in 1938, retired in 2000, and am trying to bring some attention to ReasonLines before it only happens posthumously, if it hap...
August 10, 2024 at 20:14
In: "ReasonLines" to determine validity in categorical logic  — view comment
Oh no!! So sorry! I think I had this written right and then miscopied (without re-reading) it. It makes two gross mistakes. Certainly, All B’s are A A...
August 10, 2024 at 19:02
In: "ReasonLines" to determine validity in categorical logic  — view comment
In addition to the rules of distribution, negation, and 3-terms that Tim Wood lists, textbooks often give a rule prohibiting drawing a particular conc...
August 10, 2024 at 17:03
In: "ReasonLines" to determine validity in categorical logic  — view comment
Thanks. As to the conclusion, it (as well as the premises) can be translated into statements by clicking the arrows. I hadn’t thought of showing the t...
August 09, 2024 at 13:47
⇧