night912

Apparently, you can't comprehend what you wrote, so I've bolded the relevant information below. Everything else is a red herring. So, if you have blue...

99+A=100 A=1

I'll present my answer without searching for the correct answer or before reading any of the comments. Everyone leaves on the first night because the ...

First of all, The Theory of Evolution says nothing about the emergence of life, that's abiogenesis, not evolution. Second, there's no need to try and ...

We can learn to use something/someone that corrects our mistakes rather than not caring (which is laziness) and/or relying on our own belief that we a...

AI is proficient at doing that, why didn't you used AI to do it?

Nobody here that disagrees with you, are dismissing the notion that people have had NDE. There's plenty of evidence that supports it. However, we ARE ...

No, ignorance build walls, logic opens up doors. I'll use what you said above as an example. Logic, sees that it's a false dichotomy and open doors se...

Or, if free will exist in heaven and evil doesn't exist, then it's possible that God could create a world where no evil exists and free will also exis...

Is there free will in heaven?

What do you think 'systemic racism' means?

I don't know, could the reason for why it's irrelevant is because the "god" in your argument has nothing to do with the Christianity and its god? :chi...

Another red herring. Bible verses is irrelevant to what I pointed out about your argument. So, how about you defend your argument instead of presentin...

Actually, you were the who demonstrated that you don't understand by arguing that you can prove that God exists by typing "g" "o" "d".

That's a red herring. I'm referring to your definition, not someone's else's definition. You're arguing that God is the word God and not the word God,...

Which is a contradiction.

So, you just confirmed that you only proved the word "god" and not God itself.

One is the actual word and one is not.

And yet, you didn't understand that, "the bricks that make up the sentences are not the actual words themselves," was a figure of speech :chin:

You didn't prove that the word exists. All you did was proved that the representation of the word exists.

So you agree with me, the bricks that make up the sentences are not the actual words themselves. :up:

You didn't prove that the word exists. All you did was proved that the representation of the word exists.

Due to your ignorance, you're comparing apples, red delicious, and red apples and using their differences as a method of determining whether a fruit i...

I'm sorry, I'll correct what I said. You CHOSE words and COMBINED them together to make sentences. Happy?

No, we're talking about the medical term, "abortion." They're both abortion. You're just separating the two to appeal to emotion.

Just going by the definition used by

A miscarriage is by definition, an abortion. Therefore, according to a miscarriage(abortion), is the act of killing the organism, which is wrong. Why ...

Show me where I stated it isn't. Also, show me a person who has eaten all types of meat and/or wants to eat all types of meat. Miscarriages are aborti...

You just proved that you're wrong. You combined letters above, resulting in sentences. :up: How does image 1 and 2 make image 2 invisible ? What is go...

Not everyone consider meat as food, nor does everyone who eat meat as food consider every kind of meat as food. Did the mother kill all the zygotes/em...

Can different images be amalgamated into totally different another image? - That's basically what amalgamate means. Combining image 1 with image 2 res...

One explanation for this is that the whole image in a dream is not an exact image from memory. That image could be amalgamation of several images. For...

What you said above contradicts what you've said earlier. In the USA, we are not only charged for murder if kill a human being. Besides the degrees of...

That still doesn't show that rationality is contingent on being correct or knowing the truth.

I'm not talking about the act of putting marbles into a jar. I'm talking about the marbles are stacked up in an organized way. There's no organizer th...

I disagree. Things don't always go wrong every time that people act on incorrect ideas and/or not knowing the truth. Running away or hiding because so...

That's false, not all types of organization requires an organizer. Here's an example: Evenly sized marbles inside a jar are organizedly stacked on top...

Being correct or knowing the truth is not required for rationalization. Back in ancient times, a person who conclude that the sun goes around the eart...

- That's wrong. That's not how "sound" is used in a logical argument. This is how it's correctly used: True premise + Valid argument = Sound argument

Here's the simple reason why you're not understanding all of this. You are refusing to acknowledge what the hypothesis is proposing. Take note of what...

You're assuming that the experiences must have occurred during that lower functioning state. There's no evidence that that's the case. However, there ...

Your argument is dependent on the concept of NDE and the documented claims that people have made. A common claim that is consistently made is, the lac...

But, of course, you're forgetting that NDEs/OBEs are not sensory experiences, which consists of the usage of sight, hearing, smell, touch, and taste. ...

His argument is fallacious. The entire argument is an argument from ignorance. Basically, he's saying that because he has seen evidence that donating ...

You just showed what the source of your problem. It's not atheism/atheist or theism/theist. The source is you. You weren't seeking answers when you we...

That is by definition, proving a negative. What's absurd is your explanation. You are in fact, conflating positive/negative with existence/nonexistent...

- There are two issues with this. First, what's in bold is key. It's not the same as no brain activity at all. Different types of medical machines det...