AmadeusD

I'm sorry if you are not aware - I did not make this up. THe fact that you have some store of 'trans bigotry talking points' makes it absolutely clear...

That's true, some might say that. But it makes no sense to me... If that's the 'ordinary usage' of those words (which, I don't think it is) they don't...

As noted earlier, this is pretty silly. You're describing the function of names. People are allowed to choose their own names.

I agree with this. I avoided doing so. His view is his view. His method of defending is a bit of a game. But also, you may not agree that's the case. ...

The Green Party is in a state of absolute disrepair. The irony in this party, of all parties, getting stuck for theft of luxury goods, exploiting migr...

I really respect your responses to Joshs. Wanted to throw that out. He's playing a game, and you're not biting. It's great to see. Hmm. Your account s...

I'm trying to understand your position by posing questions to you that your position entails an answer to... Why does not extend to teh age, race, wei...

DO you not see the patent ridiculousness of the dual use of 'perception' yet?

LOLOL. No knowing where you live makes this an awesome thing to think about

Thank you for clarifying

It appears to me both are still apt - (this is merely 'a take' from myself, not an intended outright claim)..morality is what one believes about how t...

That is (genuinely) good to know. I dislike boring.

You are one strange person.

You being wrong has nought to do with me, my dude. There are two sexes, and all intersex people fit into those two categories. Further complicating it...

they are all male or female, as pointed out. There are two sexes into which every single human fits neatly. If they don’t fit your definitions, thats ...

your ad hominem is duly noted

He was a poor sociologist. This is risible, also. There are two sexes. I'm engaging with the responses. I can do no more.

It isn't one, by its elaboration. Like - he isn't using science to support this system. So, your question is somewhat nonsensical, on that account. Th...

This makes as much sense as the previous comment. Which makes little sense. Being salty is unbecoming, though. So there's that.

It is not A-B. It is A-B-C-D-E-F and maybe G is the experience. This isn't complicated... I've addressed this. Restating the question in terms i've no...

They do. Though. The ambiguous language is what leaves open all of the routes of harm. Compassion without analysis is bereft of effectiveness.

This will be my last reply. The reason why, is that you are wilfully ignoring almost everything I have said to service a continuation of your point, w...

no. whatever crawled up your ass is no business of mine Baden. So much salt in here

I just enjoy irony. I don’t really hold any general impression of leftists. there are other charges on the way apparently. But in any case that’s not ...

Ok. Thanks mate.

I literally do not know what you're reading into my comments, but 'worked up' is not something I'm willing to accept about them. I've explained, in no...

Hey mate, I'm not editing this back into my more substantive reply, incase you're reading it right now - or, it's not particualrly relevant because I'...

It does not.

Yes.

This is wild. Lawyer, MP, socialist, pleads guilty to multiple charges of shoplifting extremely high end luxury fashion. You can't quite make up stori...

Ok. Thanks mate.

I have the same problem you do, but it has been put to me that I was supposed to infer a load of historical context into OP before replying. My positi...

My reply would just be an exact restating of my previous. You haven't engaged it. No worries.

No it isn't. This is a shotgun to the foot. This is an emotive position. Then I have no issues. I just reject that anything you've posited is any way ...

Yes. The article also notes the SRY-functional determination of sex and then just ignores it to wank on about phenotypical aberrations post determinat...

I'm unsure what exactly you're trying to ask. Colours are a sensation (well, a class of sensations, anyway). Read into that what you will, using your ...

This seems to forego what his point actually was - to remain humble in the face of apparent knowledge. I doubt many, if any, would claim Socrates actu...

You said you wouldn't reply anyway. But you have, and not provided anything relevant. Not. My. Circus.

This is exactly what Michael pointed out you getting lost in. You literally further complicated the grammar he provided (incorrectly, too - colours ar...

:ok:

Hmm, point taken. Using "a perception" is a bit misleading though as 'perception' is symbolizing the process, which we do not grasp fully, of getting ...

Hmm. I don't think it does. It never really was, either Bringing in a single speculative quote does not overturn the sex binary. And in any case, some...

Sense? Sure. Provides a basis for ought? No.

Just so, my friend.

That is, in fact, what that sentence means. I do not see the distinction you're trying to make here. My brain conjures up images of objects - which ar...

Im not quite sure this is apt to deal with the claim people are making about ghosts (well, those who have thought about it and theorize, rather than j...

That is, in fact, the hump the indirect realist cannot understand a Direct Realism not getting over. If the Realist argument boiled down to "I directl...

Mate, nothing here represents my views in any way that can be called reasonable. I say with literally not even a lick of negativity - I think you jmig...

Why would this be an Ought? Its completely apt. Your rejection of it, is just another example of ignoring your Emotivist bent. That's not on me, my du...

We're there dude. @"Lionino" (sorry, f'd up tagging earlier) Sorry, can you stop putting forth things I haven't said and then responding to them as if...