No one understands Witty because he makes extremely little sense. It takes a certain level of gatekeeping to maintain a character that think it unders...
Forgive what must appear a quite glib response, but this line, to me, explains your entire rationale. This seems plainly, empirically wrong. Ants, cil...
If you have some conclusive proof of the phenomenology of antelope agony, that would be interesting! I see you've entirely ignored the necessary relat...
1. Is inconclusive, and somewhat indicative that this cannot be done for self-reported pain. THe correlations are weak, or antithetical viz. : "No cor...
What are they? Your next lines were simply states of affairs without any argument about whether or not it should be. It's certainly rational, on avera...
Hilariously, I initially wrote the post this way: You continually mistake 'state of affairs' for 'moral fact' and respond with Emoji's when this is po...
You're not, though. You're just asserting certain values/disvalues not based on anything. I've put forward: We have biases towards other humans (as op...
Nothing in this is moral. You continually mistake 'state of affairs' for 'moral fact'. It will be an extremely interesting post when you come up with ...
Sorry I missed all this - It wasn't in my notification list! I have explained why (it is irrelevant what Kastrup or Chalmers think - though, as far as...
To the end above, avoid Banno and 180Proof :P Great guys, but they do like to mock here and there. Not to me. But I am probably scantly above the leve...
(aside) you may be interested in a book called DMT: The Soul of Prophecy. You can disregard the intention of the book, as its subtext - and simply rea...
Can you outline what you intend to be up for discussion? I have thoughts, but your thread appears to sort of engineer its own success. Not much room t...
Thanks Carlos - I would have disagree prior to this post, that you're discussing it. Onward... Why? What's the basis for unlearning it? (i realise thi...
Could you maybe elucidate this? I think this is a completely wrong statement. I see nothing in it. Emotivists (to my knowledge) don't claim that you a...
It is reality. I have asked you to put forward something that either discusses, or displaces this. You have failed to do so. So, once again, can you p...
This makes no sense to me. Reality is that humans are biased towards humans because we're human. You've provided literally nothing else to support any...
I agree. However, it doesn't seem to me a non sequitur to reject this reasoning because it's not objective. Perhaps this is why I have more comfort wi...
You're mkaing some utterly preposterous leaps. What I said was a non sequitur was this: (have fixed the formatting, though)Which has nothing to do wit...
Unfortunately, yes. If the world is designed such that pains indicate, very well, what to avoid, then its still end of. Excesses aren't exactly attrib...
You've inserted several bits of fact-specific information in your objection that don't exist in the claim. Much pain is beneficial. End of. This is pr...
I think I would conclude that this can be distilled into 'arbitrary'. We use that term in reference to basically 'unchangeable' characteristics elsewh...
Not at all. That you deny all of the suggestions he put forward is extremely perplexing. Swathes of pains are beneficial for various reasons. I am tel...
The seriousness with which people take the Stormy Daniels situation is utterly bizarre. It's the lowest level bullshit one could worry themselves with...
"the greater good" seems tenable only on a Consequentialist notion. Otherwise, there is no way to extend one's concept of 'Good' to 'greater' or 'less...
I would agree with Lionino here, that this isn't capturing the position very well. The concept of truth is not veridicality here, so the same types of...
But do you not see - this IS incoherent? If everything is mental, there are not external objects. That can only appear external. There is nothing to b...
This seems self-evidently wrong. Plum claiming we know good and evil from birth is both counter to the evidence, and is somewhat incoherent in it's ow...
In some sense, I agree, but hte idea that its an 'object' to be passed about is, to me, incoherent even on views other than my own. Other than PLatoni...
You may enjoy Chamlers treatment of intensions when speaking about logical possibilities. In his view, the intensions differ - so 'that tree' as a pri...
No, but I think you're in the right ballpark. I think the notion of good is something inherently informed by experience, but its not something that ar...
Hmm, I don;t think this is quite right. While I understand exactly why you've landed there, its seems entirely right to say in world A' there is only ...
You have essentially stated the 'further fact' (in the conceptual sense, anyhow) in this: || (A couple of examples of what some posit as the 'further ...
Behaviour viz adaptation, metabolism, sensitivity (in the physical sense) do not entail experience. Yet, we have experience. It appears to be somethin...
Then your position is entirely incoherent. Unless you hold a further fact view, your position rests on denying what is required for it's coherence viz...
I have genuinely no clue how you could possibly grok this from my rejecting an actual source, based on its track record of being a steaming pile of sh...
I'm unsure this is an argument. It may also be empirically wrong, and we misdescribe, or mislabel the evidence of such. A huge number of people claim ...
Comments