You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

J

Comments

So in this case, the syndrome would seem to trigger the dream, if any. Clearly it's hard to find a one-size-fits-all explanation.
March 12, 2025 at 12:32
With your caveat "most instances," I find this persuasive, thanks.
March 12, 2025 at 12:30
Just saw yours as I was posting mine. Gotta run now but will think it over. I want some way for Kripke to be on target here but it seems problematic ....
March 11, 2025 at 21:29
This is helpful, thanks. But even if the domain is fixed to include only those worlds in which "that cloud" exists . . . must I (the "baptizer") neces...
March 11, 2025 at 21:07
OK. I want to try out some thoughts about this, but first I want to clarify something about demonstratives. A proper name, according to Kripke, is a r...
March 10, 2025 at 15:34
I remember this, and I believe there was at least one experiment that provided possible evidence: An experimenter awakened a subject by (doing somethi...
March 10, 2025 at 14:58
Yes, that would draw the arrow of causation from physical to mental, with an interesting twist: As may happen in waking life, I came up with a rationa...
March 08, 2025 at 14:07
There is certainly a possibility that a scientific investigation would show which comes first, the REM event (dream) or the physical event (leg-kickin...
March 08, 2025 at 13:36
Right, this connects with @"Christoffer"'s idea, above, that the dream and the physical event may mutually stimulate each other. Does anyone know whet...
March 08, 2025 at 13:24
I like this. So, just to play it out, would that mean that, in waking life, we can acknowledge both "mental-to-physical" and "physical-to-mental" stim...
March 07, 2025 at 21:25
I'm just not following -- why is situation (b) but not situation (a) an illusion?
March 07, 2025 at 19:06
Thanks. Yes, I see the difference. Not sure how seeing a difference in possible outcomes means that I would any choice about what to do. But perhaps t...
March 07, 2025 at 17:52
Wow, it certainly sounds like it.
March 07, 2025 at 17:38
Sorry, could you clarify? What does "realize between two situations" mean?
March 07, 2025 at 17:36
The problem here is that the hard determinist would deny that you genuinely have an option. They would reply, "Certainly it seems as if you are making...
March 07, 2025 at 16:59
Yes, I guess that's another possibility -- dream and body may switch roles, mutually reinforcing the experience. At one point the bodily sensation inf...
March 07, 2025 at 16:47
Good, and glad you like the post. Everyone, please add 4. to list of possibilities!
March 07, 2025 at 15:35
I'm fine with this, as long as we understand that this terminological clarification has only sharpened the questions; it's not an answer in itself. We...
March 07, 2025 at 15:34
I like the bead illustration as a guide to intension/extension. Interestingly, we could number a set of objects extensionally without knowing what the...
March 06, 2025 at 22:39
Agreed. But don't we also have to agree that this is not necessarily true? Otherwise, where do we draw a conceptual line between what is necessary and...
March 04, 2025 at 18:59
Okay, I see where you’re coming from, thanks.
March 04, 2025 at 16:36
This really gets to the heart of Quine's problem with modal logic. Going back a bit from the passage you quoted, Quine explains: The favoritism he has...
March 04, 2025 at 15:38
I assume you mean "separate ontological entities". But if they aren't (in some sense), then what is it that's being correlated?
March 04, 2025 at 15:22
Could you say more about this? How do we know that there is no relationship between mind and body other than a correlation? There seems to be some pre...
March 04, 2025 at 13:40
I'm getting a lot out of the thread too, and I'm especially glad to see you pointing at the exchange between me and @"Count Timothy von Icarus". I thi...
March 04, 2025 at 13:28
"In fact, before I develop this any further, let me ask whether you think (2) is a fair elaboration of what you meant by "If it is not possible, then ...
March 04, 2025 at 00:07
As naming a convention, sure. Not otherwise. In fact, that 'A' has been designated at various frequencies over the centuries. Kind of like the "standa...
March 02, 2025 at 23:49
I think I see where you're going with this. A sound engineer could say (quite correctly), "Well, we hear a range of frequencies between A430 and A450 ...
March 02, 2025 at 22:53
mis-post
March 02, 2025 at 22:23
I know. I just thought the point about composition was interesting, sorry.
March 01, 2025 at 20:33
Yes! But . . . no! For me, a good example of how inadequate our current concepts are for thinking about these questions. A microbe "cares"? Absurd! we...
March 01, 2025 at 15:28
Interesting. I'm tempted to respond, "Well, if 'a frequency passing into a designated range' is not a standard understanding of what pitch is . . . th...
March 01, 2025 at 15:14
Nice. As you may know, this question of how we retain previous moments as we listen, and project future moments, is integral to a composer's skill. Ca...
March 01, 2025 at 14:29
I'm fine, then, with adopting the other usage I suggested: But I think you're questioning whether even the most sophisticated software can "hear the p...
March 01, 2025 at 14:20
But see above. The pitch changed. There is nothing called "pitch" that can move yet be self-identical. Unless we're OK with saying, e.g., "The logic o...
March 01, 2025 at 14:12
@"Banno" Yes.
March 01, 2025 at 00:28
Actually, no! :grin: But I recognize why calculus would be relevant here. Thinking about it, I realize I may have been wrong in saying that pitches ar...
March 01, 2025 at 00:27
This fits nicely with what I was saying to @"Banno". Terminology again . . . we do hear a series of tones, we just can't recognize them. A software pr...
February 28, 2025 at 23:14
No, I'm familiar with how slide guitar works, and counterintuitive as it seems, when you slide from the D to the E, you really are producing a series ...
February 28, 2025 at 23:04
That may well be right. I was alluding to that possibility when I speculated that "an account of brain development that will explain the emergence of ...
February 28, 2025 at 18:56
Some further thoughts . . . I don't think he's formulating it radically enough. Yes, this is part of the hard problem, but even more basic is the ques...
February 28, 2025 at 15:25
Sorry, didn't see you guys on this sub-thread. See my reply to @"Banno", above.
February 28, 2025 at 13:59
I understand what you're saying, and of course "movement" is used to refer to all sorts of things that aren't physical entities. In speaking about mus...
February 28, 2025 at 13:56
Then yes, with this as the final chapter, I agree with what you say about Alex's redemption. Here's the interesting story about that chapter's history...
February 28, 2025 at 13:31
I've got the original British edition, which evidently organizes the chapters differently (and includes a final section omitted from most U.S. edition...
February 28, 2025 at 02:09
Yes, that's it. Yet the illusion is extremely strong.
February 28, 2025 at 02:02
Well, the whole thing is a fantasy. Kind of a "what if?" story. But the novel helps us think about other forms of conditioning that are all too real. ...
February 27, 2025 at 23:35
Very thought-provoking, and I want more time to reflect on your ideas. But just quickly: This is a major reason why I suspect it will turn out that on...
February 27, 2025 at 22:34
Yes. But even if the chip is only put to a "good" use, Burgess' novel asks, "What have we done to a human being if we remove the choice to be good -- ...
February 27, 2025 at 22:27
An interesting example of the continuity problem occurs with sounds, as can be easily seen with music. We describe a melody as "moving from start to f...
February 27, 2025 at 19:34