You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

flannel jesus

Comments

That's... now what I said. That's not even a response to what I said.
May 28, 2024 at 13:10
meant to say strictly, and don't call me auto correct Ty, fixed
May 28, 2024 at 11:45
it doesn't strictly have to, though. Suppose something is casual on our physical world, but outside the physical world - perhaps a mind or spirit real...
May 28, 2024 at 11:40
I guess there's a few general categories, right? The people who actually try to be rigourously clear and are good at it (these people are usually will...
May 27, 2024 at 08:43
True, BUT in a philosophical setting it's fully possible that it's simultaneously true that most people don't put any significant effort into trying t...
May 27, 2024 at 08:31
Some people absolutely play games where they TRY to be as opaque as possible, and bait misunderstandings from people which they can pounce on - it giv...
May 27, 2024 at 08:15
This is why pluralism and process philosophy are so important - you don't have to take this "nothing matters, nothing is real" view, EVEN IF you accep...
May 26, 2024 at 12:41
What, in your opinion, are some reasonable inferences one can draw from these examples?
May 24, 2024 at 21:14
Really? So it wasn't you who started the conversation about my use of "except"? I think it was. You started the semantic conversation, and now you're ...
May 24, 2024 at 09:42
I didn't know that, and it's not meant to be an insult, but it is clear from all your language confusions in this thread. You're trying to correct me ...
May 24, 2024 at 09:27
I'm not getting the impression from these words that you're entirely comfortable in English.
May 24, 2024 at 09:14
I see your personal linguistic confusions, is that what you want me to see?
May 24, 2024 at 08:33
when I Google "define apart from" I get: Merriam: Other than, Besides, except for You're stretching really far for all this my man.
May 24, 2024 at 08:17
A paradox certainly ISN'T a simple story, ended with a simple question that has a simple answer. I pour milk for everyone in my house except for me. W...
May 24, 2024 at 07:18
someone from outside Seville, or someone who isn't a barber, or maybe there are more barbers in Seville but they aren't all called "the barber of Sevi...
May 24, 2024 at 05:40
yeah I don't think you're making any interesting connections just yet
May 24, 2024 at 04:42
This isn't a paradox. The sentence of the op is clearly, plainly, easily possible. Nothing remotely challenging about imagining a man shaving all men ...
May 24, 2024 at 04:40
the barber shaves all other than himself, Joe shaves the barber, but Who doesn't shave anybody. Russell gets shaved by the barber.
May 23, 2024 at 21:11
I'm not really sure how that connects to the theist stories Vera was talking about. I doubt very many of them feature cars.
May 23, 2024 at 20:22
No, Who doesn't shave anybody.
May 23, 2024 at 20:21
Joe
May 23, 2024 at 19:45
There was already some discussion on this previously, but I don't think anybody said this explicitly: Regarding the mind, and the things the mind does...
May 23, 2024 at 17:54
Like what?
May 23, 2024 at 15:31
And then it continues to make (usually) legal moves which are approximately as good as its general skill level predicts they should be. https://adamka...
May 23, 2024 at 11:59
I have to read this next, it's the follow up article https://adamkarvonen.github.io/machine_learning/2024/03/20/chess-gpt-interventions.html#:~:text=C...
May 23, 2024 at 08:19
Yeah same, this was really intriguing to me too Of course, I'm glad you think so. I've actually believed for quite some time that LLMs have internal m...
May 23, 2024 at 08:13
For full clarity, and I'm probably being unnecessarily pedantic here, it's not necessarily fair to say that's all they did. That's all their goal was,...
May 23, 2024 at 07:25
okay so I guess I'm confused why, after all that, you still said
May 23, 2024 at 06:32
Would you consider yourself a compatibilist?
May 22, 2024 at 13:22
So it's still possible that the "future" you changed to was the future that it was guranteed to be all along, yeah?
May 22, 2024 at 13:19
but you haven't proven that it was possible for you to do other than what you've done, right?
May 22, 2024 at 12:41
Have you? Change the future from what?
May 22, 2024 at 12:26
I do. In fact I think that's really what neural nets are kind of for and have always (or at least frequently) done. They are programmed to exceed thei...
May 22, 2024 at 06:44
Did you read the article I posted that we're talking about?
May 22, 2024 at 03:27
I appreciate you taking the time to read it, and take it seriously. Ever since chat gpt gained huge popularity a year or two ago with 3.5, there have ...
May 22, 2024 at 02:44
Something like that, I suppose
May 21, 2024 at 18:30
One of the interesting aspects of any society is how it deals with the parasites, the people who take but don't give, especially through violence or t...
May 21, 2024 at 16:47
An interesting parallel just occurred to me: the phrase "that doesn't concern you" compared with the phrase "that's none of your business"
May 21, 2024 at 16:32
why are you asking this like it's a homework problem? And why did you ask it on multiple forums? Don't you already have an answer?
May 21, 2024 at 16:26
I'll start demonstrating that by informing you of something you apparently do not know: the "Chinese room" isn't a test to pass
May 21, 2024 at 16:21
Judging by the way you repeatedly talk about "passing the Chinese room", I don't think you understand the basics. Seems more buzzword-focused than any...
May 21, 2024 at 16:03
"inspired by" is such a wild goal post move. The reason anything that can walk can walk is because of the processes and structures in it - that's why ...
May 21, 2024 at 15:52
so robots can't walk?
May 21, 2024 at 15:45
100 years ago, you could say "the only things that can walk are things that evolved." Someone who thinks like you might say, "that must mean evolution...
May 21, 2024 at 15:08
Connecting it to evolution the way you're doing looks as absurd and arbitrary as connecting it to lactation.
May 21, 2024 at 14:15
The alternative is something like the vision of Process Philosophy - if we can simulate the same sorts of processes that make us conscious (presumably...
May 21, 2024 at 13:42
if the only conscious animals in existence were mammals, would you also say "lactation is a prerequisite for consciousness"?
May 21, 2024 at 13:40
"we know this is how it happened once, therefore we know this is exactly how it has to happen every time" - that doesn't look like science to me. Evol...
May 21, 2024 at 13:35
I don't know what you mean by "respects science". You just inventing a hard rule that all conscious beings had to evolve consciousness didn't come fro...
May 21, 2024 at 13:29
No, you're making some crazy logical leaps there. There's no reason whatsoever to assume those are the only two options. Your logic provided doesn't p...
May 21, 2024 at 13:23