You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

flannel jesus

Comments

what does it mean to hand him to me?
February 09, 2025 at 23:54
in either case, counterfactuals work for a causal view of the world. See, you can view the world as 2 things: the way the world operates, and the fact...
February 09, 2025 at 19:36
just imagine a universe that started last Thursday. One could also imagine a godlike figure reaching in and changing a couple individual things
February 09, 2025 at 19:07
Probably, but I think it's pretty intuitive. Most people have some kind of model of causality. Counterfactual statements like mine are just the basic ...
February 09, 2025 at 18:08
my thoughts are, they could have made a different choice if they counterfactually had wanted to.
February 09, 2025 at 17:25
is that what your first reply did? It didn't look like it was looking at ANY possible answers
February 09, 2025 at 10:27
Well, I'm pretty sure if someone asks you a question, they just want to know how YOU look at it, not all the other ways it could be looked at lol.
February 08, 2025 at 13:22
Lol. I just love the idea of you giving such a useless response every time someone asks you a question. Did you enjoy that movie last night? That can ...
February 08, 2025 at 12:10
that's how questions work, that's right
February 08, 2025 at 03:18
Nothing i said would even remotely suggest memory isnt a function of the physical bain. I would hazard a guess that you didnt read much of what i wrot...
February 04, 2025 at 22:01
Again, what current evidence is that?
February 04, 2025 at 19:06
I don't think so. I think the mind is more *what the brain does*, the processes it engages in, than just "the physical arrangment that is the brain". ...
February 04, 2025 at 17:53
I haven't read the rest of this thread, but I like Jo Whelers answer. I would consider myself a "process philosophy" believer when it comes to the eme...
January 28, 2025 at 11:07
Here's an even better one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vC7odtQHoPc Given that you can produce this type of animation using only consumer-available...
January 22, 2025 at 12:00
Wonderful. Funnily enough, most flat earthers also believe the moon itself is flat. There's actually another stop-motion you can get of the moon to di...
January 22, 2025 at 11:00
It's actually apparently pretty accessible to prove the world is round. All you need is access to a 600-ft-high view of the sea. They're not exactly E...
January 21, 2025 at 20:52
I went on a couple flat earth Discord groups and was quite unpleasantly surprised with the state of their community. What I thought would be the case ...
January 16, 2025 at 14:09
sure, there's no way to be certain of anything if you are very skeptical. But if you're reasonably skeptical, there could still be ways to be justifia...
January 14, 2025 at 18:05
Recently there was an expedition to the South pole, that cost 35k per head, for flat eathers to go observe the 24 hour sun. It's called The Final Expe...
January 11, 2025 at 16:07
What does any of this have to do with sexual arousal?
January 11, 2025 at 15:55
Yeah totally. I came across this response to that type of experiment the other day: https://www.reddit.com/r/globeskepticism/comments/1dej3ox/perspect...
January 11, 2025 at 10:19
Kind of like what you did when you claimed you could just see the curve
January 10, 2025 at 19:14
this is the image I'm thinking of https://www.google.com/search?q=telephone+poles+over+sea+horizon+curve&client=firefox-b-1-d&sca_esv=16501dcb6f6c1178...
January 10, 2025 at 17:37
Yeah this is a good one. I saw an image with something like telephone poles curving down over the horizon.
January 10, 2025 at 17:33
It's been calculated to be imperceptibly small. If your view of the horizon from a beach front is x "pixels" wide, so to speak, the curvature of the h...
January 10, 2025 at 17:26
They actually do write it off that way, funnily enough.
January 10, 2025 at 17:03
Well none of those words relate to visibly seeing the horizon curving. You could tell me, "yes, I understand that you can't visibly see the horizon cu...
January 10, 2025 at 17:01
Flat earthers don't often like to prove anything. They don't even tend to make clear claims. I saw a flat earther recently claim they can triangulate ...
January 10, 2025 at 16:58
Here's a write-up on why the curvature of the earth is not visible to the naked eye when looking at, say, the horizon of the sea at a beach. https://f...
January 10, 2025 at 16:51
I watched that second video and cannot see anything like that.
January 10, 2025 at 16:45
No worries, at least we can agree - this is within the grasp of most people to figure out! Most flat earthers believe that the earth is also 6000 year...
January 10, 2025 at 16:41
I would love to, it looks like a really interesting video. It was linked in a very specific context though - the context was, someone claimed that the...
January 10, 2025 at 16:39
Judging by how you cut off my quoted post, and your subsequent response, I think you missed the part where I explicitly said that THIS question is wit...
January 10, 2025 at 16:38
so he does disprove that the horizon looks visibly flat to the naked eye in that video? So... where's the time-stamp for that?
January 10, 2025 at 16:34
Ah okay, the context you quoted made it seem like there was some specific claim in the video about the (un)flatness of the horizon. This isn't that, t...
January 10, 2025 at 16:29
that is over an hour long. I assume I don't have to watch over an hour of content to find out if the horizon of the sea visually looks flat or not. Do...
January 10, 2025 at 16:21
Indeed! There's just a bit of a trap around the hole 'seeing stuff beyond the curve' question because of this. If you went in not knowing about refrac...
January 10, 2025 at 16:16
definitely less expensive. I don't think sailing around the world is easy!
January 10, 2025 at 16:06
Absolutely. It's just interesting that, if the earth were the size oficially claimed, you would actually expect to see less than you do - that's somet...
January 10, 2025 at 16:02
Tourist rockets? Like the one jeff bezos went up in? Is there something affordable for a normal person?
January 10, 2025 at 15:59
That's not my experience. Go to the beach, look out to sea, it looks pretty flat to me. Take a photo, I'm pretty sure it's not visibly curved. Does th...
January 10, 2025 at 15:51
The weird thing I've discovered with this is that there's actually a bit of an unexpected result here (at least, unexpected to me) -- you can actually...
January 10, 2025 at 15:46
great idea! What's your preferred method of guaranteeing you're travelling the same direction? Even a slight angle off from 'straight' could lead you ...
January 10, 2025 at 15:23
based on what?
December 24, 2024 at 20:18
It did occur to me that superdeterminism is possibly compatible with some indeterminism, but i couldn't find any confirmation of that online.
December 24, 2024 at 17:29
I'm saying it's not *ordinary* determinism. There's nothing ordinary about it. It is a TYPE of determinism, but not an ordinary one, not if you unders...
December 24, 2024 at 15:13
Right, so you *really* think all these scientists are talking about it like it's a unique propsoition clearly distinct from determinism, because physi...
December 24, 2024 at 15:02
It's not.
December 24, 2024 at 14:53
Something can be rational and untrue, and something can be irrational and true, in general. Rationality's goal is (often) truth, but it doesn't have d...
December 22, 2024 at 18:43
I think the Copenhagen interpretation also rejects locality, no? -edit, i guess i've always misinterpreted what the copenhagen interpretation is.
December 19, 2024 at 20:36