ItIsWhatItIs

Sorry for the late replies, y’all, but family’s in town so I don’t have lots free time for about a week or so. Please pardon me if I happen to reply i...

Hello, thanks for the reply. That’s self-contradictory. Indeed, the definition of “x” doesn’t include “not-‘x’”; that’s like saying darkness can’t be ...

Okay, just to be clear, you were speaking in terms of probabilities, not possibilities. Got it. You know that from experience?

Hello, thanks for the reply. Yet... that doesn’t mean that its existence is impossible. You’d be hard-pressed, my friend, nay, downright defeated in t...

Hello, thanks for the reply. When I originally asked which one is “first,” or ultimate, I was thinking more in terms of independency/dependency, & not...

Okay. So, that leads to another question, which I've noted in my original comment:

Before I can make up my mind about how I think your O.P. should be answered (as if it even matters ), allow me please to ask you, what did you mean in...

Pardon the late reply, 180 Proof. Okay. So, logically a follow-up question for me is, how's it determined what, in principle, "the constraints of the ...

How's it known that something is "inconsistent with the laws of nature"?

A mere series of events can never constitute a causal relationship. The frames within a film-strip precede & succeed each other but are neither the ca...