Hello! I appreciate the thoughtful analysis you've presented on the problem of evil in relation to both naturalism and theism. It wouldn't be accurate...
Hey Katiee! I think there are quite a few arguments for why Pascal's Wager fails that don't even require one to submit to Pascal's Wager in the first ...
For the sake of argument, it appears like you're laying out something like: 1. If God exists, then good and evil must exist. 2. God exists. 3. Therefo...
Hi, gevgala, I appreciate when people lay out their argument; thank you! Premise 1 seems to assume everything has a starting point, but research in qu...
It seems like your view explained here might fall under the "God of the gaps" fallacy. If you don't mind sharing, I'm curious how someone could hold t...
Thank you! I appreciate the alternative perspective and the flipped argument you presented. However, I'd like to address a few aspects of your argumen...
Thank you all for your thoughtful replies! EnPassant, regarding the definitions you set forth; I'm not sure they're ones I could accept. It seems to c...
I'm totally happy with accepting this :) This seems to agree with my first premise. I don't think empirical evidence is needed or available in all cas...
This is a great objection! It seems like you’re objecting to premise 1: 1. If there is no empirical evidence for something, then belief in that someth...
Comments