You misread (I can't even say "misinterpreted") my OP and comments subsequent. Perhaps in lieu of putting words in my mouth and inserting your foot in...
Wincing refutation. Brutal polemic, Devastating rejoinder. Compelling counter. Always amusing when trolls like you, who lack the intellect and intelle...
First off, you need to learn the difference between language meaning and language use. Second, if you disagree with my given definition of "knowledge"...
Not at all. The utterance "The cat is on the mat" is ponderable, empirically verifiable; "other minds exist" is not. Not sure what necessity "unpackin...
No, it doesn't. Or rather "can't", and this precisely because it is imponderable (not conveniently "currently unknowable"). The epistemological issue ...
You obviously have a gift for non sequitur. Your etymological shift says nothing as regards my OP or any point made. More, you falsify my definition o...
Plato's writings are metaphysics, not philosophy. That is the whole point of my OP. Etymologically, "love" at time and context of ancient Greek philos...
They are not "snarky" remarks, Your comments have no substance. My counters to you just run off your back like water off a duck's. Your continued avoi...
Again, more unsupported sentiment in lieu of reasoned counter. There seems to be a widespread belief here that just one's pale utterance alone can som...
Again, more of the same from you. You have no argument; you have an unsupported point of view. Unfortunately, trafficking a Weltanschauung is not subs...
Thanks for making my point. The propositions issuing from metaphysics are imponderable, i.e., they cannot be rationally assessed, i.e., they cannot be...
Do you or anyone else here ever post anything other than unsupported sentiment? If all to philosophy were trafficking opinions and personal points of ...
Anything to the point? Anything at all? My post has nothing to do with prior discussions here about what the word "metaphysics" really means; mine is ...
Again, begging the question and offering appeals to others do not constitute reasoned rejoinder; they merely evade the point and juxtapose an unsuppor...
Comments