filipeffv

That's cause you don't comprehend what "subjective" really means, besides its common-sense definition. Insofar as subjective properties are concerned,...

Actually, Smith talked about this problem in Wealth of Nations...

But "utility" is not a good definition. I could value useless things...

"The value of any commodity, therefore, to the person who possess it, and who means not to use or consume it himself, but to exchange it for other com...

Actually, I kind of like maths, and philosophy of math... hahahaha That's is really sad... Notwithstanding social sciences evolved to a academic assum...

Oh, I understand. Sorry, I did wrong.

Clearly, you do not understand what he is saying, and never even take a book of transcendental epistemology to read... Ah!!! The Phenomena, not as it ...

There's, in this forum, a wrong epistemological conception and a too much faith in what science can know or can't know, almost a scientificism

This epistemological idea of a reality thoroughly independent of our mind is a mistake, because fall down on of Hume's problems... Kant had a good ans...

But we can't know that reality. The phenomena is the result of understanding and perception of the noumena.

Positivism and Materialism are rare acceptable by philosophy of science; to reject metaphysics is condemn knowledge to mere faith, as proved Gödel to ...

It remembers me Espinoza. But you would have to assume that free will doesn't exist; the problem is that, since everything is a successive and progres...

You're wrong when you write *sciences*; you should have written "hard sciences", and that'd be more correct. However, this kind of thought is a materi...