You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Joshs

Comments

Ok, I’ll bite. How much do you think has been caused by us?
February 02, 2024 at 17:35
Are you referring to this?
February 01, 2024 at 12:59
No, impugning the ethics of a family you’ve never met shows your eagerness to spread the hyped up gossip spun by the media circus rather than respect ...
February 01, 2024 at 03:12
A very wise man, indeed
January 31, 2024 at 02:11
Sure did. 55 years ago. What do you think he would say about the faculty there now?
January 31, 2024 at 01:24
Well, since I’m not partial to conspiracy theories and I dont believe in the Deep State, I think they’re fine. But fyi, mentioning a major U.S. univer...
January 31, 2024 at 01:12
Don’t forget Deleuze’s dogmatic image of truth, gifted to Western philosophy by Plato.
January 31, 2024 at 01:07
I can’t believe you’re seriously asking him this.
January 31, 2024 at 01:05
If I had to watch any news outlet throughout the day I’d end up shooting myself. I grit my teeth just to glance at the headlines online for a couple o...
January 31, 2024 at 00:20
yep
January 31, 2024 at 00:12
Or perhaps it is more revealing of your susceptibility to sensationalistic ‘news’ reporting, the circus you’re supporting by repeating their garbage.
January 31, 2024 at 00:05
These may help you to read him (they didnt particularly help me), but to understand what he’s critiquing you may want to familiarize yourself with Heg...
January 30, 2024 at 23:59
There’s always more than one side to every story.
January 30, 2024 at 23:51
What Nietzsche means by fiction is a bit tricky. He can’t mean false as opposed to what is truly real, given his assertion that nothing lies behind ap...
January 30, 2024 at 16:47
Darwin’s work made possible American Pragmatism, psychoanalysis and Piaget’s genetic epistemology, among other innovations. These ways of thinking are...
January 30, 2024 at 02:22
You said “ Maybe nothing more than who is still the more referenced, after the longer time.” As overthrown scientific paradigms from earlier eras fade...
January 29, 2024 at 21:12
According to that logic, most of what Kuhn considered to be paradigm shifts in the sciences would have to be ignored.
January 29, 2024 at 17:06
Have you read any Wittgenstein, particularly his later work? He tried to show how the kinds of questions you’re asking result from confusions caused b...
January 29, 2024 at 12:46
Please don’t be a reactionary. I highly recommend Lee Braver’s ‘A Thing of this World’, in which he discusses and compares Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche, Fou...
January 28, 2024 at 14:14
Philosophy changes its mind all the time, usually well before the sciences do. The kinds of neurological ’fixes’ you describe have little to do with t...
January 28, 2024 at 13:31
I had never heard of Tallis until you mentioned him. I’m sure he has interesting ideas to offer, but he’s an ignoramus when it comes to poststructural...
January 28, 2024 at 03:12
To me it’s like interpreting a film on different levels. You can certainly read Nietzsche as an existentialist and get a lot of him that way. Understa...
January 26, 2024 at 23:21
I hear the Existentialists are mighty fond of him, too.
January 26, 2024 at 21:21
Don’t believe it. It’s been 135 years since Nietzsche went crazy and his ideas still haven’t been absorbed by most of today’s philosophers. That’s how...
January 26, 2024 at 21:01
But you also said in a previous thread that you have little background in philosophy, having wasted two years attempting to learn it.
January 26, 2024 at 19:49
What Thompson means by condition of possibility here isn’t simply the generic givenness that things are intelligible but the specific way they are int...
January 26, 2024 at 13:50
Philosopher Lee Braver happily associates philosophies and metaphysical eras with paradigms. There is the Kantian paradigm, the Heideggerian paradigm,...
January 25, 2024 at 23:25
I can’t help but suspect that Law would consider Thompsons’s thoughts below as a form of idealism.
January 25, 2024 at 13:09
This last option is from Berkeley? It would seem to just reverse the roles that subject and object play in a realist account, by placing an idealist s...
January 24, 2024 at 17:41
Not sure, since he didn’t have time to elaborate. How do you interpret it?
January 24, 2024 at 14:35
God, I hope not. That would make me much less interested in Nietzsche.
January 23, 2024 at 19:49
The natural sciences are conventionalized versions of philosophy whose ‘advantage’ over the latter is not that they secure better access to truths abo...
January 23, 2024 at 13:20
Sort of. For Heidegger it’s not so much a matter of adapting to already formed external realities. Rather, it about creating possibilities.
January 23, 2024 at 02:40
Thrownness is an interesting concept. You’re right that some interpret this as meaning the history of external circumstances which shapes us outside o...
January 22, 2024 at 22:40
Yes. Every aspect of the world interacts with every other such that no laws , rules or fixities constrain it. Instead, interactions produce new intera...
January 21, 2024 at 13:42
This absent-self idea comes from Heidegger but Sartre insisted on bringing back the Cartesian subject and freely willing consciousness as the basis of...
January 21, 2024 at 13:01
There are approaches within psychology which argue that ‘mind’ is not an inside set off against an outside, but an inseparable interaction, a system o...
January 21, 2024 at 00:20
Perhaps the problem originates from the categorical nature of the distinctions you make between what you understand as the subjective and the empirica...
January 16, 2024 at 12:12
It’s the Uber-pizza
January 12, 2024 at 12:35
Do you have any famous philosophers in mind here, or just the hoi polloi?
January 11, 2024 at 13:18
. Nietzsche didn’t speak of will to meaning but will to truth, a subset of will to power. His notion of power wasn’t some kind of concentrated energy ...
January 11, 2024 at 13:03
No wonder. Ever notice how who you think the other person in your relationship is changes over time, and who they and you are changes through being af...
January 08, 2024 at 17:45
The Kuhn-Popper split is one of philosophy rather than science, and the two views definitely cannot be accommodated within each other, any more than p...
January 07, 2024 at 01:34
You may have a more definite view without being aware of it. That’s why I mentioned the split between Kuhn and Popper on how what’s out there impacts ...
January 06, 2024 at 20:48
Is logical impossibility the same thing as nonsense? Doesn't what is logically impossible conform to the criteria of meaning that allow a judgement of...
January 06, 2024 at 19:37
Wouldn’t the boundaries of a metaphysical system be defined not by what it deems logically impossible, but what appears from the vantage of that metap...
January 06, 2024 at 18:50
Have you heard of Object Oriented Ontology, or Speculative Realism? They compose a diverse group united by the claim that philosophy since Kant has be...
January 06, 2024 at 01:45
The Age of the World Picture. You can find it in The Question of Technology.
January 05, 2024 at 01:29
As long as an organizing contribution of a subject can be detected in the description of physical phenomena, then a species of idealism is at work.
January 04, 2024 at 23:50
If we leave aside his focus on rational communication and consensus, aren’t we ignoring the central features of his philosophical outlook? It seems to...
January 04, 2024 at 20:22