90% agreed. The rest 10% is what "absolute" is about. So if you disregarded that 10% we would have total agreement. I.e maths is predictive and useful...
that depends on your understanding of "physical", whether it's matter and energy as it now stands or just part of existence or the whole existence. Th...
No, maths should not be an absolute candidate to stand up because it cannot prove itself to be consistent. Please refer Hilbert's second problem on ar...
OK, again you need a ground to stand on. Sounds like usual empirical or "scientific fashion" view, right? Can be anything else? That's main stream I d...
Fair point if you wanted only arguments. But what I referred to like Wikipedia researches already contained too many anti-arguments, why would I need ...
Totally agreed especially on this point Few discuss limits of science and what can be alternatives. Your belief is always respected but when it comes ...
Do you think most have a chance to choose what to believe in? I know you didn't intend to say so. I think this has roots in an open question: what is ...
Sam, we are closer. I haven't fully read the article myself and the only thing emerged from it to me is the weakness of testimonials. Nevertheless we ...
We are still far away at two ends while I have asserted agreement with your NDE belief: I dissuade any proofs and you defend your testimonial evidence...
I joined lately and bypassed almost all previous comments, don't really know where to start with. But I am inline with your thoughts. One thing is tha...
Comments