Angelo Cannata

Your premise is wrong: monotheism was not born after reasoning that one God is able to do everything. Monotheism was born because one God prevailed ov...

You are confusing knowledge with possibility of knowledge. For example, you can get knowledge of how to play the piano, but the existence of this poss...

Self-criticism. This is my way. If a person practices self-criticism, that person cannot be so destructive, because that person will continuously ask ...

Every religion has different ideas about God, and even inside the same religion there are commonly different and even opposite ideas about God. To wha...

This objection works if we consider relativism in a static way, as it was something conclusive, like a system of ideas, an ideology. I think a lot of ...

Both positions are subjective and both are relative: they are both relative to your evaluation and you are in both cases the subject who evaluates thi...

We cannot analyze our brain without using it at the same time. So, how can we consider it as an object, since, as soon as we try to do this, we are au...

Math problems and logic are thought by our minds, then we attribute them to the world and we think that they are universal, as the world is shaped acc...

In philosophy there is not more or less universal. If something is universal it means that it is able to prove itself the same to everybody, everywher...

Talking about particular domains does not imply the assumption that there is a universal domain. Nothing is universal for relativists. Rather, referen...

It is just because I had read Wikipedia that I made my question: the quoted entry of Wikipedia - doesn’t say “Relativism doesn't deny "objectivity" - ...

Can you mention any source saying exactly what you said?

If I say that “flying horses” do not exist, this does not mean that for me “flying horses” means something different; on the contrary, exactly by sayi...

You are confusing criticism towards objectivist philosophies with the meaning of the word “objective”. Of course relativism is a philosophy that think...

Can you mention at least one philosophy or one dictionary, apart from your exclusive one, that means the word “objective” as “dependent on the subject...

This is not what you find if you look for “objective” in any dictionary. See, for example, here: “In most of its common uses, objective is contrasted ...

You can say this in everyday life language, which is a language that doesn't need to be exact, precise. But, if you want to talk in a proper philosoph...

Whatever objective you think you found is interpreted by you, so how can you say that it is objective?

Even our idea of natural selection, however we describe it, is a human interpretation. Even when we support our ideas with scientific evidence, it is ...

It looks like you are confusing how things work when we try to explain nature by logic. When we are able to predict the behaviour of an object, or an ...

Any argument in this world, including theistic and non theistic arguments, can be easily demolished with some criticism. For example, no argument is a...

According to Lewis’ argument - the planet earth is flat, because those who believed it was flat weren’t lunatics, nor liars; - the ancient Egyptian Ph...

I would like to understand what you are arguing about.

I think that Descartes failed in finding something able to resist the attack of doubting. His reasoning is exposed to a lot of criticism, it can be ea...

I think that any agreement or disagreement from other people can’t set any ultimate support abot reality, because, ultimately, whatever they say is in...