You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Apustimelogist

Comments

This can be framed in terms of prediction, inference, model construction. It is called active inference, a corollary of the free energy. https://en.wi...
August 08, 2025 at 01:47
Well, we don't necessarily need representation in that kind of way. All that we do is predict what happens next. All that we have to be able to do is ...
August 07, 2025 at 18:26
Sure, but do I have to be a mentalist to be a phenomenologist?
August 07, 2025 at 00:45
Pictures taken by the camera. Yes, but so what. If I want to know more about the object, I take more pictures, I use other tools to investigate. Well ...
August 07, 2025 at 00:42
I acknowledge that I can only see what I can experience. This is not interesting though.
August 06, 2025 at 23:48
Thats like taking a picture of something and calling it a "camera-dependent object". I don't know why you keep phrasing it as if the object is depende...
August 06, 2025 at 23:47
Hmm, is mathematics a meta-language for relational structure?
August 02, 2025 at 22:15
Exactly one point in time is a low probability event!
July 04, 2025 at 06:06
If it was a high probability event then you wouldn't be here!
July 03, 2025 at 15:12
My condolences, very sad to hear. May you rest in peace.
June 25, 2025 at 00:11
So to be clear, the first two paragraphs are you and the rest is chatgpt's commentary?
June 15, 2025 at 17:08
Chatgpt did all the work
June 15, 2025 at 03:54
But the point is that the scientific study of brains doesn't care about fundamental metaphysics. We just study and describe patterns of what we observ...
June 10, 2025 at 17:24
So are you suggesting that what science understands about brains could never be true under idealism? How would you explain what we observe about brain...
June 09, 2025 at 17:01
But even in a panpsychist universe, the brain would have exactly the same role and would completely explain intelligibility in either a materialist or...
June 09, 2025 at 15:41
The materialist would say that an understanding of how brainsw work fills this gap.
June 09, 2025 at 15:19
All very good, thoughtful posts :up:
May 27, 2025 at 22:51
I don't really see any merit in what you're saying. At the end of the day, we have clocks. At the end of the day, things happen when you no one is loo...
May 27, 2025 at 01:15
I would argue that these reflrct how a system might be sensitive to different information, like how some animals see at greater resolution and detail ...
May 26, 2025 at 05:27
In what way? I am nit sure what the thought experiment conveys. But this is trivial, no one expects that information about something has to be the sam...
May 26, 2025 at 04:46
No, I offered that if we can produce concepts that don't seem to subjectively vary (e.g. the ticking of a clock), then is that not mind-independent? D...
May 26, 2025 at 04:05
I don't think there is anything more to capture. My view is that mappings or couplings between us and reality are sufficient to pick out "stuff" or on...
May 26, 2025 at 01:03
The irony is that I would consider myself closer to these post-positivists than positivists, and many post-positivists would probably also disagree wi...
May 25, 2025 at 17:39
I would say I allow realism but in a thinner, looser, more deflationary sense of a consistent mapping or coupling to the outside world without requiri...
May 25, 2025 at 17:26
Well, this seems a given unless you have a more nuanced definition of what you mean by external, independent reality (or the converse). I definitely s...
May 25, 2025 at 16:56
Well I think any non-positivists, physicalists, naturalism-ists can say that too. I just wanted more clarity on the meaning of space and time as about...
May 25, 2025 at 16:49
Someone doesn't have to be a positivist to disagree with your ideas.
May 25, 2025 at 04:41
Well it is not. No, its just what the body of scientific knowledge looks like, and thereis no evidence to the contrary. Its about not including things...
May 24, 2025 at 18:52
I think this is more or less an acceptable interpretation. Hmm, I think it is compatible with realism and anti-realism, because I am just appealing to...
May 24, 2025 at 18:25
Woops, premature post.
May 23, 2025 at 22:55
Fair enough. We will just have to agree to disagree. My use of the word physicalism is maybe misleading, but I like using the word because it captures...
May 23, 2025 at 22:25
Then how are you supposed to convince me of what you say with such confidence if it has no demonstrable consequence for anything. If there is no demon...
May 23, 2025 at 16:27
Again, with the example of quantum observer-dependence, you can point to actual theoretical, empirical consequences. That is what I want to see. I don...
May 23, 2025 at 05:06
Given that you would agree that the universe had a history before any organism observed it, this is just meaningless. Absolutely no need to conflate o...
May 23, 2025 at 04:39
I'm talking specifically about your Kantian space and time stuff: e.g.
May 23, 2025 at 00:17
Yes, some.
May 23, 2025 at 00:00
Honestly, I find this time and space stuff meaningless. I don't understand what you actually mean by it or what implication has for anything at all in...
May 22, 2025 at 23:33
This is just going in loops I can't follow A physicalist would say that you can describe how a brain does what it does in understanding the world virt...
May 21, 2025 at 16:53
I don't understand what you mean by the idea that structure of the world needs explaining. Its like asking why there is anything at all, which is a qu...
May 20, 2025 at 16:12
I suspect that I don't understand what you mean. Sure, but I don't think that is any novel step from what I just said. To understand that behavior is ...
May 20, 2025 at 15:12
Alright, sure. I just think those things come from a brain that has evolved able to infer abstract structure in the information it gets from the envir...
May 17, 2025 at 15:19
In: The Forms  — view comment
Aha, no that was a mistaken phrase; I did not mean to imply essentialism for myself!
May 17, 2025 at 01:09
I am not sure what this means: the interpretative structure of following a ball and catching it? What kind of answer you want? I don't understand why ...
May 17, 2025 at 01:01
In: The Forms  — view comment
Yes, I think for me this is the kind of view of language that should go there. Itsthe kind of view that speaks to my inclinations and provides importa...
May 17, 2025 at 00:38
This is the same as what the bit you quoted was describing.
May 15, 2025 at 15:26
In: The Forms  — view comment
You could say that but then again, many of our concepts are about physical things, many of our abstract concepts are about things that "supervene" on ...
May 14, 2025 at 02:03
In: The Forms  — view comment
Sure, but if you can't articulate what you mean, then you are just effectively circularly re-asserting how you use words and behaving in response to s...
May 14, 2025 at 01:53
In: The Forms  — view comment
Yes, my point is just that if we don't know that then we are just re-asserting the way we use words in response to what we see without any deeper expl...
May 14, 2025 at 01:25
In: The Forms  — view comment
Sure, and I think part of my point is that this kind of thing is already inside the kind of perspectivr related to word-use. So invoking forms doesn't...
May 13, 2025 at 23:42
In: The Forms  — view comment
But anyone using the word 'round' is using it because they are engaging with the world around them and they see 'round' things. Imo, if we want to exp...
May 13, 2025 at 15:37