You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

vanzhandz

['Member']Joined: February 09, 2022 at 06:05Last active: August 13, 2023 at 04:492 discussions17 comments

Discussions (2)

Comments

Although I'm sure I have forgotten many things when it comes to this argument, I think I've covered that one. I'll quote myself here because I believe...
August 10, 2023 at 17:59
Didn't really sound like you were trying to please me. It was more like you wanted to get a witty little burn to make yourself feel good.
August 10, 2023 at 17:49
I appreciate where you're coming from. Although, I think there's more value in actually expressing that criticism than just making references to it.
August 10, 2023 at 17:45
You're taking my words out of context to make an assumption about how I interact with the truth of other people. I've literally been trying to find an...
August 10, 2023 at 03:59
I would say that the usefulness of a particular statement is not limited by someone else having already made one similar to it. Ultimately I believe t...
August 10, 2023 at 03:54
I agree that the term "base reality" is somewhat vague and doesn't really lend itself to the argument I'm making. Overall, I'm looking for a line of r...
August 09, 2023 at 15:57
You know what Banno, I was mean there, sorry. I stand by my previous comment but I get what your saying.
August 09, 2023 at 06:02
Base reality Babyyy.
August 09, 2023 at 05:58
Thanks for your response Dale. I would say that even if my own subjective reality is the result of another’s subjective reality, the question still ca...
August 09, 2023 at 05:56
I disagree that it’s irrelevant. Maybe the overall question ends up to be irrelevant but the line of reasoning can be used to further many arguments. ...
August 09, 2023 at 05:36
Yeah, they would. I wouldn’t disagree with that.
August 09, 2023 at 05:27
Thank you for your response. I appreciate your well rationalized definition of what a mistake is and I agree said definition. I think however that you...
February 11, 2022 at 10:03
Thank you very much for pushing me to expand upon my points. I agree that I did a poor job explaining them and that I really ought not call them "proo...
February 11, 2022 at 10:03
I understand the concept you're getting at. I am not however trying to prove whether "Meaning" is an illusion or not. My idea is based upon humanities...
February 11, 2022 at 10:03
Well it's a good question, but I'm not sure if it's required to understand my argument. I am not saying that one can prove whether the reality they wi...
February 11, 2022 at 10:03
Thank you for your question. I agree with you that "meaning" must exist within reality alongside the humans that create it. My definition of however i...
February 11, 2022 at 10:03
I appreciate your response. You are correct in saying that my terminology is most likely flawed, I need to do better. My point wasn't exactly meant to...
February 11, 2022 at 10:03