You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Stoycho

['Member']Joined: January 26, 2022 at 07:31Last active: October 22, 2024 at 18:451 discussions6 comments

Discussions (1)

Comments

In: Is Mr. Reid's "brave officer" objection to Mr. Locke’s account of personal identity valid?  — view comment
What I think, at this point of my journey, is that it is not at all the same. Because only looking from our own viewpoint we are indifferent to what e...
January 31, 2022 at 13:32
In: Is Mr. Reid's "brave officer" objection to Mr. Locke’s account of personal identity valid?  — view comment
Seems there is still something that bothers me and I had to continue a bit further... All of the following thoughts are based on a distinction between...
January 31, 2022 at 09:00
In: Is Mr. Reid's "brave officer" objection to Mr. Locke’s account of personal identity valid?  — view comment
@"Agent Smith", @"Harry Hindu" Thank you for your answers. They definitely are a pleasant sources for further thoughts. My concerns were of a bit diff...
January 28, 2022 at 19:01
In: Is Mr. Reid's "brave officer" objection to Mr. Locke’s account of personal identity valid?  — view comment
I am unfortunately in the very beginning of my journey in Philosophy (and even more unfortunately this is not to imply that I am young), so I am not y...
January 27, 2022 at 18:17
In: Is Mr. Reid's "brave officer" objection to Mr. Locke’s account of personal identity valid?  — view comment
If that was Mr. Reid's intention, and if we assume that (1) is an established fact, then I will have to accept his argument. But if (1) is not an esta...
January 27, 2022 at 14:28
In: Is Mr. Reid's "brave officer" objection to Mr. Locke’s account of personal identity valid?  — view comment
Yes, almost. In place of different "people", they speak about different "persons". The main point of Mr. Reid's objection is to show that by following...
January 26, 2022 at 20:22
⇧