You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

That's because you have bizarre fringe views which are far removed from the reasonable standards of a court of law.
August 22, 2019 at 19:51
That's a red herring which fails to address the content of my reply. If you don't accept what I said as true, then make your case. But if you're going...
August 22, 2019 at 19:46
Hahahahaha!
August 22, 2019 at 19:11
Hate crime, obviously, which is defined as a crime, typically one involving violence, that is motivated by prejudice on the basis of race, religion, s...
August 22, 2019 at 19:05
Which video?
August 22, 2019 at 19:02
No, it's not sorcery. You're being utterly ridiculous. The speeches of Martin Luther King Jr. and Hitler literally changed the world, and in significa...
August 22, 2019 at 18:48
I'm being realistic, which beats naïveté any day of the week.
August 22, 2019 at 18:42
I'm talking about real effects, too. It'd be daft to suggest that only sensory effects, like light and sound, are real. Hate speech can change one's o...
August 22, 2019 at 18:39
Which is why it will never work.
August 22, 2019 at 18:33
Of course they don't call for that! But that's the kind of thing that you'd get by abolishing the pillars of society. It is the height of naïveté to t...
August 22, 2019 at 18:31
How absurd. So, let's say that a young man who became engrossed with and joined a far-right anti-Islam group has just been convicted of a hate crime w...
August 22, 2019 at 18:23
So? That's obvious and beside the point. The fact that it's a reaction to the speech means that the speech had an affect on the listener. And that's a...
August 22, 2019 at 18:00
And all of his objectionable policies relating to tax cuts, foreign policy, immigration, the enivonment, trade, gun control, healthcare...
August 22, 2019 at 17:47
I wasn't suggesting anything of the sort. The relevance of the example is that during that period there was no central government, which is what anarc...
August 22, 2019 at 17:40
Between the fall of Siad Barre's government in January 1991 and the establishment of the Transitional National Government in 2006, there was no centra...
August 22, 2019 at 15:58
Like I said, it depends what that means and what that logically entails. Until that's explored, I don't have a position on the matter, so yeah, agnost...
August 22, 2019 at 15:45
In common parlance, we could say that I chose to purchase the books. But whether or not that's true or false depends on interpretation and on what's t...
August 22, 2019 at 14:15
When you can't distinguish between a choice and what just appears to be one, then you can't rightly call it a choice, unless you alter the definition.
August 22, 2019 at 14:01
Yeah they are. Example: the writings of Marx influenced my thinking, which in part caused me to purchase a number of books on the topic.
August 22, 2019 at 13:55
Decisions are influenced causally by a wide range of factors, and that can include hearing a speech.
August 22, 2019 at 13:11
No. I just smoke, and then a decision is made on whether or not I have cancer. Correlation doesn't imply causation. ( :wink: )
August 22, 2019 at 12:48
Case closed.
August 22, 2019 at 12:46
I've addressed this line of questioning from you about a million times before. You must like going around in circles to the point of absurdity. Absolu...
August 22, 2019 at 12:40
I don't think we'd even be arguing with the likes of Janus and the discussion creator if they just came out and admitted that their definitions are no...
August 22, 2019 at 09:10
A classic slippery slope argument.
August 22, 2019 at 08:59
Anarchism is great in theory, but it's just pie in the sky. No successful or lasting real world examples come to mind. There was a brief period during...
August 22, 2019 at 08:40
Which would mean the abolition of the State, which would mean disorder. That's what it would mean, unless you set boundaries protecting the State and ...
August 22, 2019 at 02:17
Yes, I agree, and one of those possible answers is, "It's impossible". Just saying, "I don't know", doesn't rule out that possibility; which, if true,...
August 22, 2019 at 01:54
Why would you expect me to grant a point I clearly disagree with, and why would you think that repeating it with more or less the same wording would h...
August 22, 2019 at 01:34
Oh yeah, well my definition of life is the best, most perfect definition of life imaginable, and it reflects the ideal, objective, scientific, utopian...
August 22, 2019 at 01:18
It comes as no surprise that you would say that. You two seem almost like sock puppets. I have, and not for the first time. It usually follows a patte...
August 22, 2019 at 01:15
No, I'm bored because you're getting repetitive, and because it seems like we're reaching a dead end with regards to how you're choosing to define you...
August 22, 2019 at 01:06
What's funny is that you're both just wishful thinking. Apparently the definition of life is whatever you want it to be! What nonsense, and Janus, you...
August 22, 2019 at 00:55
No, even if your premise is true, the conclusion doesn't follow, as a simple matter of logic. An example of a moral judgement.
August 22, 2019 at 00:51
This is getting boring. Just because you can string those adjectives together, that doesn't mean they actually apply. It seems kind of mad or childish...
August 22, 2019 at 00:43
It's also bonkers.
August 22, 2019 at 00:37
I'm not even disagreeing with you that life is oriented for dealing with things. That's obvious and either not a problem at all, or at least not a pro...
August 22, 2019 at 00:29
Maybe. My position on this issue isn't developed enough for me to say whether it is determinism or compatiblism or perhaps something else, but clearly...
August 22, 2019 at 00:15
I certainly don't buy your interpretation of it.
August 22, 2019 at 00:08
That's absurd.
August 22, 2019 at 00:05
But it isn't. The default is what you can find in a dictionary, not your favoured normative stance in ethics. That's not objective morality, or even m...
August 21, 2019 at 23:57
No it doesn't. The broadest and most readily understood definition of morality is that it's what's right and wrong. That has no implications whatsoeve...
August 21, 2019 at 23:35
What counts as the flourishing or languishing of a community is far from objective, nor the only possible basis for objective morality. That's but one...
August 21, 2019 at 23:12
That's just immorality as defined by collectivism. The title of this discussion seems misleading. Is it a normative ethical discussion where you argue...
August 21, 2019 at 23:04
I don't. And you know how much time I spent on here around that period. And spam never seemed to be a problem throughout my duration as a moderator.
August 21, 2019 at 22:57
Does it? It makes sense in theory, but how often are you getting the real deal, and how often are you getting false positives?
August 21, 2019 at 22:54
No, that's not morality. That's a description of something which you judge to be moral. If you want to know what morality is, then consult a dictionar...
August 21, 2019 at 22:49
Maybe scrap the spam filter? How effective is it anyway? It seems to cause more problems than it solves.
August 21, 2019 at 22:44
But you've said that you're an anarchist.
August 21, 2019 at 22:38
It is unreasonable for him to do as you ask as it is both impractical and unnecessary. If it is necessary for you to be convinced, then you yourself a...
August 21, 2019 at 22:30