You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

You aren't correct. At 38 weeks, it's definitely an organism. It has it's own organs.
March 09, 2016 at 22:25
I hadn't heard that quote before. I like it.
March 09, 2016 at 22:21
I had a feeling I wouldn't be able to resist replying. :D That's like, your opinion, man. Yes, because you apply some special meaning to the word "hum...
March 09, 2016 at 22:14
I'm glad we have at least some common ground contra Moliere's "ideal" world. The voice of reason. :D
March 09, 2016 at 21:45
Well, I am a conservative on this issue, in that I want to conserve the current law against abolishment or radical reform. And I am judging those who ...
March 09, 2016 at 18:34
There are judgemental attitudes aplenty on both sides of the fence with this one. And, given your reply, you're hardly an exception. I am not entirely...
March 09, 2016 at 18:15
I don't think it's that weird, but it was only a generalised label in any case. Being a leftist doesn't entail liberalism in all matters or unfettered...
March 09, 2016 at 17:40
All terrible reasons to have an abortion. They don't have to keep the baby after giving birth. There are these things that you might have heard of cal...
March 09, 2016 at 17:22
It should be illegal as a preventive measure. Baden put it well when he spoke of the cases "where the major harm - the complete destruction of one hum...
March 09, 2016 at 16:57
I find statements like the above pretty shocking. Anyway, it's been interesting, but I think I've reached the point where arguing with you any further...
March 08, 2016 at 22:41
Because it's unfair and discriminatory. Perhaps you're ok with that, but I'm not. If that's a problem, then we might benefit from more women in such r...
March 08, 2016 at 19:20
I mean what I said. I don't know why you find it confusing. If you think that there ought to be women-only authorities over issues which effect mostly...
March 08, 2016 at 18:08
Similarly, my main problem with your position, @"Moliere", isn't about internal consistency and rationality. My earlier charge of absurdity was in rel...
March 08, 2016 at 16:10
So, you think that abortion policy should only be set by women because abortion policy is one of those that clearly effects/affects women more than me...
March 08, 2016 at 16:01
That isn't what he said, although it's possible that that was what he meant. That's a different issue. I don't think that it's reasonable unconditiona...
March 08, 2016 at 14:56
That's another statement that I find particularly disagreeable on sexist grounds. Our ideals are clearly opposed in certain respects. The thought that...
March 08, 2016 at 03:56
If 7 out of the 8 shared the same conclusion, and the other one opposed it, then, in that respect, there would be a consensus against the other one. T...
March 08, 2016 at 03:44
Viability is related, and can act as a sort of guide, although how reliable a guide it is or can be is debatable. But I think that it's better than no...
March 08, 2016 at 01:26
There should be legislation in place so that there's legal recourse for abortion under such circumstances, yes. But it's no simple matter. That's how ...
March 08, 2016 at 01:14
No, not in the case of a viable foetus. It clearly states that this is soley about the judgement of the physician in regard to the viability of the fo...
March 08, 2016 at 00:21
My point was that they are already aware, otherwise they'd expect surgeons to be charged with a crime under such circumstances. Yet oddly enough, that...
March 07, 2016 at 23:48
It is. Common folk aren't dumb enough to expect surgeons to be charged with a crime under such circumstances. Give 'em some credit.
March 07, 2016 at 23:30
Hanover is a lawyer of some sort, if I recall correctly. So I'm guessing he has a pretty good understanding of the law. And as for my part, I was alre...
March 07, 2016 at 23:23
I never disputed that the line is drawn at various stages of development, nor that the justifications differ. That does not entail that there is no co...
March 07, 2016 at 22:51
So, I checked out that link that you provided. I see that @"Hanover" has gone above and beyond refuting your argument on it's own terms, although, as ...
March 07, 2016 at 19:14
Ah, I see. Well, regardless of whether or not you set out to persuade me, or whether philosophy itself is good for persuasion, the fact is, you made a...
March 06, 2016 at 00:34
Tappy hirthday, Biff.
March 05, 2016 at 20:42
Eh? What did I say to provoke this red herring about persuasion and implications that I haven't made? I think that it's absurd because it is absurd. I...
March 05, 2016 at 19:48
No correlation whatsoever? So, you believe that if, here in the UK, as of tomorrow, the law enabled practically anyone over a certain age (eighteen or...
March 05, 2016 at 19:31
Oh god, is Moliere's position representative of a significant portion of the left? If so, I'll gladly disassociate myself from this group within the l...
March 05, 2016 at 18:55
Terry Eagleton on Marx regarding equality:
March 05, 2016 at 03:11
Ok, but given the situation here in the UK, I think that the chance of it getting to a stage in which we'd need to arm revolutionaries is very unlikel...
March 04, 2016 at 19:36
So, you think that people are too stupid to drive responsibly, but not too stupid to use guns responsibly?! Give 'em cars and they'll kill each other ...
March 04, 2016 at 17:54
Decisions need not be made irrespective of what the market demands. That can be taken into consideration. But they don't get the final say. There coul...
March 04, 2016 at 16:58
How can you be penalised for something that you were not entitled to in the first place? The profit that you can gain will be in proportion to the wor...
March 03, 2016 at 23:24
In less inflammatory terms, I was speaking of excess wealth. They will be rewarded with proportional wealth. They aren't entitled to more than that in...
March 03, 2016 at 17:23
They make a difference, as they ought to, but not big enough. You seem to be judging proportionality based soley on the amount contributed, rather tha...
March 03, 2016 at 15:26
I.e. personal responsibility for public irresponsibility, and no safeguards until it's too late.
March 03, 2016 at 13:29
It boils down to what amount of their money has been earnt. Ownership of the means of production doesn't mean that you've earnt a grossly disproportio...
March 03, 2016 at 12:26
Right, because that has worked so well thus far. A big part of the problem is that your appeal to voluntary action falls on deaf ears for so many peop...
March 03, 2016 at 12:08
But motivations motivate action, and bad motivations can lead to bad actions, and are more likely to do so. That was basically my point in the discuss...
March 03, 2016 at 11:42
Generalized label: Leftist. Form of government: Socialist Democratic Republic with a more direct form of democracy. Form of economy: I haven't thought...
March 03, 2016 at 00:29
Yes, that's true, I think. The House of Commons - particularly Prime Minister's Questions - over here has a notorious reputation for it's frequent lac...
February 27, 2016 at 16:55
No, not language users; language. Without language, there can be no sentence. If there can be no sentence, then there can be no true sentence. Yet, at...
February 19, 2016 at 01:20
Yes, I agree. It's more complex than what I said, but I stand by the principle behind what I'm trying to say. It's about getting the right balance. It...
February 19, 2016 at 01:05
If there is no language. Yes, I know: "P" is true if and only if P But through biconditional elimination: If P, then "P" is true Which I have a proble...
February 18, 2016 at 23:17
I reckon that those who are genuinely interested in reducing poverty, and not just taking advantage of the situation as a means to a greedy end, would...
February 18, 2016 at 20:03
Sorry, I didn't realise quite how unrealistic your hypothetical scenario was: so unrealistic that the wealth of those who are wealthy and uncooperativ...
February 18, 2016 at 19:20
I said that the burden would be better placed on the super rich and powerful (because I believe that they are better equipped to solve the problem). T...
February 18, 2016 at 18:07
You're attacking a straw man. My point was just that the burden is better placed on those with stupidly vast sums of money than on ordinary folks. I d...
February 18, 2016 at 17:13