You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

My original point was that swimming with sharks, as opposed to not swimming with sharks, for example, might not be in one's best interests. And that, ...
November 09, 2016 at 19:51
I can raise a reductio ad absurdum against the alternative. If it isn't, then examples like the one that I provided wouldn't make any sense. But they ...
November 09, 2016 at 19:31
Well, for starters, they each have distinct and inequivalent meanings. Moreover, if it is possible for one's best interests to not always correspond t...
November 09, 2016 at 19:16
I don't know who they are. But I think you know what I'm getting at. The analogy doesn't have to be perfect.
November 09, 2016 at 18:43
I believe that there are some pretty clearcut cases where prioritising preference over what's in one's best interests is more likely to lead to worse ...
November 09, 2016 at 18:40
Okay. >:O So you bit the bullet and went with the stupid conclusion. At least you're consistent.
November 09, 2016 at 18:35
What? How so? I applied the same form of argument as you did in a different context in order to show that it's a poor basis for reaching a decision, a...
November 09, 2016 at 18:30
How about you added that in after I had already begun to reply, so I didn't notice it? I have answered it in the edit to my reply.
November 09, 2016 at 18:17
Ah, that old chestnut. They are relative terms. And in this case, I'm talking about what is in the best/worst interests of you or of society, as oppos...
November 09, 2016 at 18:11
So, not only did you make the worst possible decision, you did so on shaky grounds. Is that supposed to be a defence? If I can't stand waters that are...
November 09, 2016 at 18:07
No it ain't. Don't kid yourself. Trump has said he will significantly cut corporation tax, and, according to analysis, his plans would mean that the t...
November 09, 2016 at 17:31
I think that that is the worst decision that someone in your circumstances - someone who has socialist views, and views with much in common with those...
November 09, 2016 at 17:13
Then we best prepare for President West.
November 09, 2016 at 13:35
If only... Maybe next time. (If he lives long enough :s ).
November 09, 2016 at 13:08
No, yet again, you have misunderstood. That is one of the reasons why I just can't bear to continue this discussion with you. So, please, don't tempt ...
November 09, 2016 at 12:36
Ah, and he took Pennsylvania and Wisconsin too, just to rub it in. Tories, Brexit, and now Trump...
November 09, 2016 at 12:21
If WI, AZ, and NH go to Trump - and he's in the lead in each of those states - then he'll be on 269, and will need just 1 more vote to win, which he'd...
November 09, 2016 at 04:54
Holy shit. The tables have turned. These analyses they're making on BBC News are saying that it's going to be difficult for Hillary Clinton to win - w...
November 09, 2016 at 04:31
I'm lost for words. I can't continue this discussion with someone such as yourself. That is all I'm going to say.
November 08, 2016 at 23:23
Or, if one wants to see a supporter of conservative legislation and conservative nominations on the Supreme Court, but one thinks that Trump's flaws a...
November 08, 2016 at 11:58
It has been in this situation before with George W. Bush, and it voted him in, not once, but twice. :o
November 08, 2016 at 05:01
It was perhaps unwise of you to challenge me in this way, because, unlike you, I have been paying close attention to what my interlocutor has been say...
November 08, 2016 at 04:21
It's not just an accusation though, and I challenge you to show otherwise. I haven't even had much reason to accuse anyone of committing that fallacy ...
November 08, 2016 at 03:47
If they act like someone who believes that scientific theories are true, then that is reason to doubt their professed absence of belief. How do people...
November 08, 2016 at 03:04
You said, only a few pages back, that you "think the issue is whether or not there is an absolute good, not exactly what such a good would be". I have...
November 08, 2016 at 02:28
There is a difference between consequentialism and the fallacy of appealing to the consequences. Consequentialism is a normative ethical theory for de...
November 08, 2016 at 01:02
There might still be a conflict of a different kind: between professed belief/disbelief and behavioural expectation. In other words, there might be a ...
November 08, 2016 at 00:51
No, that isn't what really matters. It doesn't really matter if it can't be knowingly applied, and it can't be knowingly applied if all you know is th...
November 08, 2016 at 00:22
It's all right. I forgive you. But only because I like your name.
November 07, 2016 at 15:07
Please link me in when replying, so that I'm notified of your reply. This can be done a number of ways: by highlighting the text that you want to quot...
November 07, 2016 at 14:56
As explanations, they are in conflict. As beliefs, they would also be in conflict. But if one is merely using one of the explanations for some other p...
November 07, 2016 at 14:18
Amen. But the alternative of being consistent by biting the bullet and including them is also pretty dire, so it's a lose/lose situation.
November 07, 2016 at 14:02
If you deny the possibility that we could discover higher goods, in light of the discovery of this highest good, then that can only reasonably mean th...
November 07, 2016 at 13:11
You mean like you have done, when, for example, you poisoned the well in the middle of an ongoing discussion? I should have deleted that one, actually...
November 07, 2016 at 12:08
Says who?
November 07, 2016 at 11:55
Oh my god... fools! That is about as wise as cutting off your nose to spite your face. (And I know a thing or two about wisdom. ;)) Bernie himself sup...
November 07, 2016 at 11:47
No, go with Shpleeple.
November 06, 2016 at 16:05
You should definitely go for either Drupal, Joomla, Moodle, or Tiki Wiki, because they have the most amusing names. Or Shpleeple, which is one I just ...
November 06, 2016 at 15:58
https://youtu.be/6WR5RARV5dE
November 06, 2016 at 15:48
This might just be the funniest exchange on the news I have ever seen. https://youtu.be/1exuYjqcHNQ
November 06, 2016 at 14:40
Can you give an example? Do you think that Dawkins has done this? I'm interested in whether you think that Dawkins has done this. Like I mentioned, I ...
November 06, 2016 at 09:36
I likes it.
November 06, 2016 at 09:20
And people are annoying. Having someone around so much, expecting so much from me, would be annoying.
November 06, 2016 at 09:17
Yep. That's the right way to word it, as well as the right approach. If you want more than that, then you'll have to provide stronger grounds. @"mcdoo...
November 05, 2016 at 19:19
Chapter 2? Was in a diner with Chloe and her mum, and I told her about my ability. Now we're in a junkyard.
November 05, 2016 at 16:04
Who? Me? Oh, I've read them all. They all just love talking about something which doesn't exist. Almost as much as religious folks. Except that in the...
November 05, 2016 at 14:00
@"Michael" You helped convince me to buy Life Is Strange, and it really ain't that great a game - although I'm still only part way through. The story ...
November 05, 2016 at 13:43
Family Guy doing a Dallas parody? https://youtu.be/iDuMp2kDxos
November 05, 2016 at 12:02
Nowhere near as interesting as a bio of her namesake and predecessor, but it might be worth a watch. Unfortunately, I don't have Netflix, and I ain't ...
November 05, 2016 at 11:33
Oh, it seems to you, does it...? I have. Allow me to inform you. No. It has not. Feel free to check.
November 05, 2016 at 11:21