TheMadFool

What other cause do you have in mind? Also please read my reply to jamalrob.

But I've only applied scientific principles. Does this mean science too is flawed?

Thank you. No, the certainty in my proof is at par with the certainty of science. Not more and also, not less.

However I don't see how one can be justified in ignoring it for science but not in the case of god.

Thank you for taking the time to reply. My humble observation follows: The central two statements being discussed here are statements in deductive log...

Please read my reply to jamalrob

Let me clear up the matter. My reasoning, in complete agreement with the scientific method, is as follows... If god exists there should be observable,...

''Measurable'' simply requires a unit of measurement and we can count how many people pray, how many times we pray, etc. ''Scientific'' means one must...

You're right BUT... One has to measure these, you say, properties. The only way you can do that is by observing effects of these properties on instrum...

Measurable effects of God: 1. How many people pray? 2. How many times do people pray? 3. How many people avoid a certain kind of food item? 4. How man...

Then you should agree that... Mass, volume, charge, velocity, etc. are evidence for the mere belief of electrons, protons, neutrons, in fact the whole...

Scientists used instruments to detect physical evidence of the ether. Had they found any, they would've affirmed the existence of ether. There's plent...

LIFE is a joke. Philosophy helps to understand the joke

Please consider the following very closely. 1. Sometime in the 1900's electromagnetism was discovered. The next question was the medium in which EM wa...

Hi. Can you please explain how you used math on this paradox. I can't find it. Only if you have the time ofcourse.

Well, you seem to say that there's an equivalence between ''god exists'' and ''god doesn't'' as evidenced by you claiming that a lack of god can also ...

How do you provide evidence for the existence of something?

OK. Thanks

Kindly provide me your method of proving that something exists or not.

Then please tell me in what way one could provide evidence/proof that an entity exists?

Perhaps justice is more than just a redressal mechanism in the sense that it involves more than the individuals concerned. We have to also factor in t...

Although I understand (to a certain extent) why vengeance is immoral I still can't shake off my intuition that it is actually a very fair scheme.

Please read my replies to the other members

You're right. Well, since my reasoning is unmistakably scientific do you agree with me that science is not entirely correct in its methods and princip...

My position, repeating for the nth time, is that my reasoning is based firmly on the scientific principle that existence is a function of observable e...

Thanks for your informative post. But how do you explain the move away from the principle an eye for an eye (as modern justice has)? Is there somethin...

Find replace all instances of ''proof'' with ''evidence''. My post still makes sense. A single or even many, excepting ALL, cannot provide evidence (y...

My humble opinion on the matter. My logic is a bit rusty so bear with me These two logically equivalent statements are UNIVERSAL statements meaning th...

Ask this question to science. I'm simply following the scientific principle that for something to exist it must have observable effects. In addition t...

Good point. Thanks. However it follows that you also accept, given your stance, that atoms, chemical reactions, physical laws are also simply beliefs

Thank you very much for the clear response. I guess I've been sloppy with my terms. However, it's not a fatal flaw in my argument.

please read my reply to Chany

I'm simply adhering to a scientific principle viz. existence is a function of observable effects. To repeat, a stone exists by virtue of its effects o...

Briefly, my point is the application of the scientific principle on existence when applied to god leads us, clearly, to affirm god's existence. We can...

I'm not claiming anything. Science makes the claim that for something to exist its effects must be detectable, measurable and clearly god(s) does have...

What do you do with empirical claims?

Ether or better I declare the existence of a particle ''foolon'' that has no mass, no charge and cannot be detected by any known scientific instrument...

Where's the error?

:) Where's the error in my reasoning?

All of them. I'm not a mathematician but to speak mathematically if there's no problem with the soundness of the main theorem I care not for the corol...

Let me try to explain. I can't do it better than this so please try to understand my point of view. People observed the universe and all its wonders. ...

Your argument sounds very similar to Chany's. However, as I presented my argument we've already moved beyond the hypotheses construction phase. To cla...

How does it matter?

I take a stone, weigh it and measure its dimensions or throw it at a window. There is an effect - the scale moves, the window shatters. I don't need a...

I'm giving you all scientific proof of God(s) existence.

Can you explain yourself? Your last post seems to suggest that there's no hope for us and we'redoomed toconfusion. Yet in the quote above you say we o...

I may be wrong but it appears to me that scientific objectivity rests on multiple experiments showing the same result. This is puzzling. Each experime...

Thanks. I had a good laugh. However, despite how funny the cartoon is I couldn't help but feel both sad and scared at 1. The obvious cruelty of god in...

I agree. Justice makes no sense outside of a social context. However...a teleological question arises. What difference (teleologically) is there betwe...

In that case, we could all be living in our idiosynratic private ''worlds'' - completely different from each other. In this case how do we find common...