You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

t0m

Comments

I feel the same about you. I realized you were using it colloquially, but I have great respect for the depths of these ordinary words. They are the tr...
October 20, 2017 at 22:34
I think we are mostly on the same page, that it's a matter of language. I recognize that you are also a "cool" guy, and I really like this word "cool....
October 20, 2017 at 22:27
I can relate to what you're saying. There's a sense of humor or humility that's to be embraced. There is so much genius and beauty and achievement out...
October 20, 2017 at 22:20
Perhaps you could quote some highlights. I'm not a subscriber, and I'd prefer to respond to a particular point.
October 20, 2017 at 22:12
I found it interesting, somewhat convincing, but not conclusive or exhaustive. That one dies one's own death seems at least as central. The "they" can...
October 20, 2017 at 22:10
I'm questioning the strength of the distinction between the aesthetic and the rational, emphasizing that thinking is purpose driven. Roughly speaking,...
October 20, 2017 at 22:04
I have to disagree. We can turn the crank of the machine of formal logic. We can work within the norms of normalized discourse and make slow, steady p...
October 20, 2017 at 21:20
Indeed. In some moments we enjoy ourselves as important and worthy. In other moments we may suspect otherwise. But then creatively adjust our perspect...
October 20, 2017 at 21:17
I'm glad your with us.
October 20, 2017 at 21:14
But surely we are creatures of desire and hope, attaining goals and then always setting new goals? I do understand that a certain spiritual serenity o...
October 20, 2017 at 20:22
That's a fair question. I think that "world" or logical space is a dimly perceived background or frame. Someone could argue, perhaps, that the corresp...
October 20, 2017 at 20:19
Found some stuff in Kojeve that may help illuminate this issue. The last part is what I especially had in mind. https://archive.org/stream/pdfy-xPoejl...
October 20, 2017 at 12:27
I wish you had omitted me from the general censure. I acknowledge the darkness, while denying that it is the "truth" about life. It's one face or mode...
October 20, 2017 at 11:57
Thanks. I definitely read Dasein as a more holistic notion of human being. But still man. I don't mind, though. I really don't see how anthropocentris...
October 20, 2017 at 11:46
I'm not sure that anyone denies the basic structure of hope, desire, or purpose. I'm trying to figure out why you find the hope-cycle so disagreeable....
October 20, 2017 at 11:43
My pleasure. I didn't understand that last post. Care to clarify?
October 20, 2017 at 11:36
Kojeve, blending Hegel and Heidegger, had it : Man is the Concept is Time.
October 20, 2017 at 11:34
That's from the lecture (not the book) The Concept of Time. Someone (can't remember who) called it the Ur-B&T, just as the ~100 page book of the same ...
October 20, 2017 at 11:26
I was referring to "what are you on about?" I suppose that was your second post in the thread. Here's Dreyfus' quote of Carman, since I'm such a nice ...
October 20, 2017 at 11:06
Not sure how you intended your entry into the conversation in terms of tone, but I'll assume and hope it was friendly. That said, I googled and found ...
October 20, 2017 at 10:55
What are you on about?
October 20, 2017 at 10:46
But presumably you see, yes? I can't wait for the "we," or depend on the "we." What I largely mean by transcendence is getting beyond a political noti...
October 20, 2017 at 10:44
Oh how much we differ here. To me it's almost the very point of "religion" to provide transcendence, and I put that word in quotes because transcenden...
October 20, 2017 at 09:26
It was Innwood or Carmen or both that I got this idea from: Death is the closing down of possibilities as other possibilities are chosen. Death is als...
October 20, 2017 at 09:06
But do you not speak here as if "logic" had a fixed meaning? What you or anyone offers metaphysically is not formal logic, a mechanically checkable ta...
October 20, 2017 at 08:56
I understand that. But how is this vagueness itself not your brute fact? I like it. I didn't start with it, but thinking about explanation led me to m...
October 20, 2017 at 00:19
Very much agree. Kojeve's Hegel uses "satisfaction" as the criterion for wisdom. The wise-man can give a satisfying account of himself. The dialectic ...
October 19, 2017 at 23:28
Yes, I agree with this.
October 19, 2017 at 23:24
Will-to-power, right? Yes, but "power" is ambiguous. Will-to-glory, will-to-beauty, will-to-the-sublime,.....will-to-virtue. For me this image of virt...
October 19, 2017 at 23:03
Interesting. I view my "transcendence" in the same way. I try not to be seduced into evangelizing a fixed-idea or incarnating an alien Cause. My image...
October 19, 2017 at 22:57
Just to be clear, I don't think there is an answer to this "why." I think it's a pseudo-question, however lyrical. My argument is centered around my n...
October 19, 2017 at 22:45
To be clear, pain is not good. But this not-good of pain is potentially (in some lives) balanced out by the indeed-good of pleasure. I suppose I am tr...
October 19, 2017 at 22:33
But why this logic of symmetries? Why is existence such that it would be absurd if the actual world didn't conform to symmetry based principles?
October 19, 2017 at 21:51
I don't think the light burns. Or it doesn't burn everyone. Some will be offended by a vision of futility and repetition. I'll grant you that. But oth...
October 19, 2017 at 06:05
Eternal recurrence is a good mention. At this point, I'd say yes. That would mean going through hell again, but it would also mean going through inten...
October 19, 2017 at 05:59
If I may put this in more vulgar terms, we are fucking to fuck, as well. We are eating to eat. We are sleeping to sleep. Entertaining, by the way, is ...
October 19, 2017 at 05:39
That rhetoric doesn't deflate me. I know that game backwards and forwards. I've played it. I've been the "dark truth" guy for decades. I note that you...
October 19, 2017 at 05:33
I agree completely. I don't even see it as a tangent. We are always already our pasts. We come to language with an inherited "interpretation of Dasein...
October 19, 2017 at 05:21
I just mean that the world as we value and know it as humans is only here while we are. If an asteroid wipes us out, the substratum will still be here...
October 19, 2017 at 05:14
It's your business, but maybe your lifestyle isn't what it should be. My physical/economic lifestyle changed while my "metaphysics" stayed the same an...
October 19, 2017 at 05:10
Yes, I agree with the basic structure. But "seeing it for what it is" is also part of the structure. This vision of instrumentality is itself instrume...
October 19, 2017 at 05:06
Well said. Reminds me of a great scene in Dead Poet's Society. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aS1esgRV4Rc
October 19, 2017 at 04:51
But "trapped" implies an unpleasant situation. I don't think your description is incorrect. I just think you are adding a value judgment to an otherwi...
October 19, 2017 at 04:47
Yes, that makes sense to me. I think we do well to question the question and the questioner. I think in terms of motive. Why do we want to know? What ...
October 19, 2017 at 04:35
Yes. Yes, indeed. As you may recall, I suggested before that it's really all about the positioning of the sacred (of "God"). My thesis is that everyon...
October 19, 2017 at 04:15
It is despair is the opium of the pessimist. Isn't this just as fair? There's lots of truth up there, but I'd have to stress that the instrumental the...
October 19, 2017 at 04:01
I read the review. It was pretty great. His position is roughly my own. He notes that either explanation is not really an explanation. It points back ...
October 19, 2017 at 03:48
Really? Lots of atheistic materialist are quite moral. I think of Karl Marx and Ludwig Feuerbach. I can see them, however, from Stirner's perspective....
October 19, 2017 at 03:32
I agree. I think views are generally dogmatic and self-sealing. I don't relate to materialism myself. To me it's too theoretical, too abstract. It's n...
October 19, 2017 at 03:19
I can relate. I think that's what we all do. We have certain "investments," and we argue with ourselves about "live" options, options that we can tole...
October 19, 2017 at 03:13