Mikkel

Here what I can do: Suppose that we start with the assumption that there is no knowledge out there in the objective reality. Then I construct evidence...

You don't get that you are doing a case of begging the question- ( -when you assign the odds. Now I don't do metaphysics and epistemology as knowledge...

Now I see a tree. That is non-inferential, I will accept that for now. But what that have to do with the objective reality? What do you mean by object...

How can something be not real? If you have a hallucination, then is that a not real or unreal hallucination or is it real? What is real and how do you...

How do you explain a hallucination? I once lived at the coast and could look out on a bay. Once day I saw an island, which I hadn't seen before and ne...

It is incorrect, because I believe despite evidence that you are something even if I wasn't around. Of course, I believe I will die one day. Now you t...

How do you know that it is something and not an illusion? You take for granted that there is a screen in for of you. How do you know that there is? Ho...

That you are perceiving them! How do you know that?

How do you know that? Well, because you told me so, which makes it a dogmatic claim. You don't get Agrippa's Trilemma, because you keep claiming that ...

I don't know ;) how to get this across. It is pointless to point out that my argument about knowledge fails, if all arguments about knowledge fail. In...

For which you run into Agrippa's Trilemma, because now you have to make a reasoned argument as how you know that. Or you simply declare dogmatically t...

That is a variant of a dogmatic claim. There is a screen in front of me, because that is how it is and it is not worth questioning and anyway it is ab...

Agrippa's Trilemma is a variant of skepticism about knowledge. It can be explained in the following manner: When you claim something, you ask yourself...

You in this thread dismiss an argument, because it is incoherent, That is fair and well, but it misses the following possibility: That all claims with...

You claim by extension of your demands for logic and e.g. coherence in regards to knowledge, that knowledge is possible with logic and e.g. coherence,...

If all your experiences are illusory, are they then real and how the world works?

Yes, that is the point for all aposteriori premises including your version, that we can trust our experiences. They are all begging the question and s...

The problem is in a sense that our reasoning and beliefs are the same for a common sense universe and the two other possibilities. In other words we h...

You take for granted that we can know about the world. I don't, because I haven't been able to find any knowledge about the world, which isn't either ...

[ I don't know if this has been brought up, but anyway here it goes. What causes you to have experiences? What can you control? These are the 2 key qu...