You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

bloodninja

Comments

Not really. Aristotle had no trouble, Kant had no trouble, Schopenhauer had no trouble, Nietzsche had no trouble, etc. etc.... I think you are misinte...
December 09, 2017 at 01:11
You appear to be grounding morality in biology. That is all I meant by calling your view biological determinism. You seem to be understanding human na...
December 08, 2017 at 19:30
Wow that is a very controversial view! Could we call your view biological determinism? It seems to be a naturalism based in our biology or genetics. I...
December 06, 2017 at 21:11
Fair enough. But Heidegger is explicitly not describing consciousness. Being in the world, for him, is more basic than consciousness or unconsciousnes...
December 06, 2017 at 20:43
What is the difference between the virtual and the actual other? Lately I've been digging into Heidegger. Heidegger describes how dasein is for the mo...
December 06, 2017 at 11:05
For anyone who's interested. Heidegger on the nothing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jt-4hV6Rf1k
December 05, 2017 at 07:56
Interesting response. Yes the phenomenon of the nothing must also have positive aspects. I think genius like Einstein and Nietzsche for example, as we...
December 05, 2017 at 05:45
But how would your view incorporate society's moral changes?
December 04, 2017 at 08:44
Right. I was merely responding to the argument above regarding the circularity. Yes there are ambiguities everywhere...
December 04, 2017 at 08:33
The 2nd time you use "physical" above do you mean physical as in "an object of physics" like you do the 1st time you used the word? Because physical c...
December 04, 2017 at 08:18
Are you equivocating here?
December 04, 2017 at 08:02
I think you're onto something interesting here. It is vacuous in a way. In a way not. I think the apparent circularity is between the empirical scienc...
December 04, 2017 at 07:56
No way I don't think that. I think you and I agree. All I have been trying to do is to show that the Webster definition is not suggesting this, that r...
November 30, 2017 at 06:13
I don't. You do because you say race is not related to culture and then you go and use race to describe a kind of culture. The Maori culture is relate...
November 30, 2017 at 05:24
'Trait' has different meanings. It is a distinguishing characteristic of some kind. A material trait as concerns culture refers to the style of the ma...
November 30, 2017 at 04:30
Maybe it would be interesting if you gave your view of how we even speak of Maori culture if culture is not related to race? Maori is a race. Putting ...
November 30, 2017 at 03:36
You have it back to front. The definition is not saying that culture is based on race, only that distinct racial groups have a shared culture. Are you...
November 30, 2017 at 03:24
I think you need to distinguish between race and genetics Race is social, genetics is science. Moreover, the definition does not mention genetics once...
November 29, 2017 at 21:35
I still dont know what you mean. By "defined by" i take it that you mean determined by. But the definition doesn't say that race determines culture. Y...
November 29, 2017 at 20:46
What do you mean by "related"? This is extremely ambiguous
November 29, 2017 at 11:11
If they did not then we couldn't speak of a Maori culture, or a Samoan culture for example. It would be unintelligible what we mean by these terms if ...
November 29, 2017 at 11:08
What do you mean by "not related to race"? It is time to get clear...
November 29, 2017 at 11:01
Did you think the definition that you mentioned was saying that race (or genetics as you understand it) somehow determines culture? I think you have s...
November 29, 2017 at 10:34
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sEZmMeH96Q
November 29, 2017 at 09:48
If you want to understand The Nothing watch The Never-ending Story. Abstract philosophical concepts are useless. We are the nothing.
November 28, 2017 at 20:37
if that is how morality is grounded then how is morality not completely accidental and arbitrary? But morality doesn't seem to be completely accidenta...
November 27, 2017 at 20:37
From Wikipedia: Craig Venter and Francis Collins of the National Institute of Health jointly made the announcement of the mapping of the human genome ...
November 27, 2017 at 08:04
I agree with that. But given that race is not genetic, but is yet another socially constructed grouping like religion and "other social groupings" it ...
November 27, 2017 at 05:34
I think you may have misinterpreted the definition.
November 27, 2017 at 02:02
I think in your 2nd example, the customer is just nutty. So I don't think it has much to do with (in)authenticity.
November 23, 2017 at 05:50
It seems to me that meaning is grounded in our cultural background practices. I walk along the street and I am bombarded with meaning; its ubiquity su...
November 21, 2017 at 06:13
I still feel confused about the how. Can you please repeat what you understand the how to mean?
November 21, 2017 at 05:57
I think the only way to make guilt clear is to relate it to the care structure which is supposed to be an ontological characterization of how dasein e...
November 20, 2017 at 10:26
It has been a while since I read Brave New World. Do the test tube humans never get old because they undergo a tranquilised sedated demise as one does...
November 15, 2017 at 05:35
Hursthouse talks about v-rules. She means that the virtues already contain normative rules within them. E.g. "Do what is honest/charitable; do not do ...
November 15, 2017 at 03:58
I wonder whether the reverse of this is truer.
November 15, 2017 at 03:22
I think that end note is written by Farin, not Heidegger, and so at best, it can only be taken as an interpretation of what Heidegger was trying to ge...
November 07, 2017 at 11:14
I think that is roughly how it unfolds in B&T Because nobody would understand what the time was otherwise haha. But I think Blattner/Heidegger argue t...
November 01, 2017 at 01:43
Just a thought... Maybe death just is this existential unattainability?
October 31, 2017 at 05:34
That Blattner article is great! I'm not so sure about this... Heidegger does describe a 'temporality of circumspective concern', which is more closely...
October 31, 2017 at 04:47
October 29, 2017 at 09:48
Hey Tom, sorry I haven't had much time to engage in this discussion. But what do you think Heidegger means by pastness in The Concept of Time? By 'the...
October 23, 2017 at 08:31
How so? Morality is only human. God is dead. Sentience is absolutely irrelevant as far as the grounding of morality is concerned. I think you are also...
October 21, 2017 at 10:57
Sorry I don't understand, can you please explain more what you meant here? No because the idea of sentience grounding morality can't be taken seriousl...
October 21, 2017 at 06:41
I agree. It does seem vague. I'm no expert either but I think the reason it looks vague to us is that we perhaps don't have a complete understanding o...
October 21, 2017 at 06:13
I agree absolutely. I also liked Carman's apt description of biological perishing and biographical demise. I suspect the 'existential wholeness' aspec...
October 20, 2017 at 23:02
That Carol White forward written by Dreyfus that you linked above is brilliant and extremely comprehensive! I would HIGHLY recommend that everyone who...
October 20, 2017 at 21:33
1. God. Which god? Jesus? Allah? Shiva? Buddha? Brahma? Ganesha? Mahavira? etc. etc... 2. Well-being. Okay but how would one know what would count as ...
October 20, 2017 at 06:15
That there is no universal moral code does not entail that morality is as arbitrary as you portray it!
October 19, 2017 at 09:40
I really liked learning and reading Schopenhauer at Uni. It was so different to everything else that I had encountered at that point. All I was meanin...
October 19, 2017 at 03:19