ucarr

By this argument, EPP is allowed as the causal history of Sherlock Holmes as rendered in the socially-verified mind-scape. E1"Is a member of all that ...

Regarding,"the lack of a state"qualifying as a predicate, such a predicate applies to a cognitive entity of the mind-scape. Only a cognitive entity of...

I read the text in bold as saying, "the predicate 'has wings' has an object (Pegasus) to modify." (So, 'has wings' makes a claim about an existing thi...

Is EPP your language denoting Sartre’s “Existence Precedes Essence”? Anyone can show non-existent winged Pegasus is a contradiction by establishing th...

No. You did say, "the thing modified doesn't necessarily exist." See your own quote below. You can talk about things - which can be physical, or abstr...

You make analytic declarations of the existence of a thing within the language field and then argue for such axiomatically determined existence therei...

Things that either exist or don't exist simultaneously. This is a description of paradox. The idea is simple, "Talking about attributes implies the ex...

I think it makes sense to say a thing is red such that there's an intersection between the thing and redness such that the two overlap. Within the reg...

E{B} says E (Winged) changes B (Horse) into Winged Horse. 0{B} says 0 (non-existence) changes B (Horse) into { }, the null set, which is the empty set...

Let C = {D | D ? C}, then D ? C ? D ? C. C = Existence; D = Object (that gets modified). Existence (C) is expressed as Let C = {D | D ? C}. The two br...

I think there's a logical issue embedded in your language: A = ¬EPP; B = Pegasus; C = Existence; D = Object; E = Winged (modifier) ? Let C = {D | D ? ...

Pi = the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. My mind tells me one of the main revelations of pi is the picture of the straight line of ...

Does the noun need to exist for the sake of the adjective function? Since an adjective is defined as a modifier (of a noun), how can it modify if ther...

Your statement raises logical issues: a) if something doesn't exist, it doesn't exist anywhere; b) if two things exist outside of (A?A) but rather as ...

Thanks for the correction. Attributes exist as characteristics that don't characterize anything? They embody the role of an adjective, but they don't ...

For what I know now, I think existing things have presence. Presence is a detectable part of the world that relates to its perceiver. Presence and its...

If I'm reading you correctly, then I understand you to be saying a concept of the number two within the mind is not material, whereas one stone beside...

This is one of my premises. ~E1- Existence is a part of all parts of objective reality. My premise above is an elaboration of this definition. Distanc...

I acknowledge what you have written above is the truth and moreover, your technique of examination is both sound and correctly applied to my reasoning...

Now we're looking at an opportunity to have a good exchange of ideas. In my quote above, the critically important words are "Logically speaking..." an...

This is one of my premises. ~E1- Existence is a part of all parts of objective reality. My premise above is an elaboration of this definition. Distanc...

Empirical Experience Vs Pure Logic Your partition between the two modes: a) pure logic; b) empirical experience presents artificial. The same pure log...

:up:

If you're willing to enter "bounded infinity" into the Google Search Engine, you can start learning about it. Take for example: {0,1} This bounded inf...

The crux of your argument is the equation of B: objective reality with C: human cognition rendered through language. If, as you've been arguing: then ...

Instead, I get: A=Existence B=Life C=Death A ? ((?B)?C) As far as what we know empirically, we only experience life without beginning or end. We see o...

Sticking with the accepted meaning of words is one of the things writing and talking is specifically allowed to refuse to do. The reason we of our gen...

In your two descriptions, respectively, of "definition" and of "premise," you example something taking a form by force of an axiomatic assumption with...

All of this supports the interpretation that language and the thought supporting it are emergent properties, not the fundamentals of the dynamism of p...

Are you viewing my quotes through a Wittgenstein-inspired lens of analytic philosophy? Language is a voice emergent from the effects of expression con...

Do you believe a definition cannot be used as a premise? If not, why not? Consider: I will use E1 to develop a chain of reasoning that evaluates to a ...

I'm defending the EPP. My defense stands upon E1 as its premise: "Is a member of all that is part of objective reality" I catch my clue about the rela...

Premise – Metaphysics is An Incomplete Project Meinong, when he says certain things (a circular triangle) have no regular existence, but nonetheless h...

I wonder if a 0-dimensional point, as in the singularity, hints at what space without time might be like. I think I’ve seen some debate whether time e...

I don't twist your words; I quote your words. See the bold, underlined key word below: A ninth grader easily understands your words in bold to mean: s...

Then, as I said, a priori conceptualization needs to express correct reasoning. This is a roundabout statement that makes a faulty approach to saying ...

Your digression to your OP is irrelevant. Your consciousness never transcends your mind. You've not seen directly the origin of the universe. You have...

I've posted three of your quotes on "scope of causation." Why isn't that evidence of me acting in good faith? Why am I prohibited from using set theor...

I've already said the designer is the one who designs by no-design. Designing by no-design is designing by a designer. You're the one championing no r...

Why don't you repost your quotes for my convenience. I always do that for you.

You fail to see the circularity I keep claiming? Here it is: In the bold letters we see you saying an uncaused thing has no reason (cause) for being b...

Are you trying to say, "Logic need not be consistent with what we don't know empirically"? Both empirical observation and a priori conceptualization n...

I have three posts from you: On the basis of these quotes, I don't see anything explicit or implicit that suggests your use of "scope" means anything ...

How does the super-atomic world approaching absolute zero temperature and the cessation of motion become a 0-dimensional point? Okay. We both accept e...

If you conceive and maintain the intention to stay out of a war between two other parties, what steps do you take to design the conceiving and the mai...

Zero can be considered a placeholder or a number. Mathematicians agree zero is a counting number, a whole number, and an integer. Zero is a good way t...

Let's first look at some of your important words here. Your important words appear above in bold. Nothing and something are unrelated with one excepti...

Scope, which means extent of, can be applied to the inclusivity of a set. Example: the universe is the set of all existing things. Why do you deem thi...

If you're equating zero with non-existence, I disagree. As you say, zero is a number. With this clarified in agreement between us, we now want to exam...

If we consider a container that is packed maximally tight with marbles as a near-zero entropy, do we arrive at picture of a zone wherein physics is al...