You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Ghost Light

['Member']Joined: August 19, 2021 at 23:36Last active: September 15, 2021 at 17:262 discussions23 comments

Discussions (2)

Comments

If there is no such causal link then the argument is unjustified
August 23, 2021 at 00:26
Thanks for these. I'll definitely be looking into this.
August 20, 2021 at 22:11
I'm that fellow mysterian!!!
August 20, 2021 at 21:38
Very interesting hypothesis. Do you have any resources or reading materials for me to look at because your theory sounds really interesting.
August 20, 2021 at 21:38
If you have a theory not on the list please comment below...
August 20, 2021 at 18:33
The particular handicap when it comes to materialist theories of consciousness is that we make a substance that is antithetical to consciousness and t...
August 20, 2021 at 18:28
This response will only work for people who already accept that there is an afterlife which is filled of infinite goodness.
August 20, 2021 at 18:17
Thanks for the clarification. Never heard this perspective on causal principles before.
August 20, 2021 at 18:16
It seems you adopt a view of pragmatism where if the principle does not help us in everyday life then it is meaningless? I don't think this answers th...
August 20, 2021 at 17:50
@"Benj96" The question I would ask is, assuming the being is not a God, is does God exist? I think it's the most important question for us to know the...
August 20, 2021 at 17:46
I would disagree here on the science of the big bang. Quantum gravity and emergent space time could easily mean that time can apply in a slightly diff...
August 20, 2021 at 17:45
Good perspective. Thanks for the response.
August 20, 2021 at 17:41
@"Wayfarer" Nominalists will heavily disagree with the first claim that numbers don't begin to exist and don't cease from existing. Even if Platonism ...
August 20, 2021 at 14:31
Thanks for the comprehensive response. I'll go and think about this and read up on some of the literature.
August 20, 2021 at 14:02
Interesting response. Thanks for your engagement with my post.
August 20, 2021 at 01:28
Thanks for the response. In the mereological version of the Kalam i wasn't trying to state it as true, I was just arguing that someone who uses Alex's...
August 20, 2021 at 01:27
I'll admit off the bat that I am not all that familiar with the brain in a vat literature so some of my comments here may seem misguided. I am not com...
August 20, 2021 at 01:22
I have a few further questions from your responses if that is ok? My response to this is I don't see any reason to accept that it is not useful to try...
August 20, 2021 at 01:03
Someone who uses this line of reasoning needs to show a necessary causal link between omnibenevolence (being all loving) and the removal/prevention of...
August 20, 2021 at 00:49
A further comment is that a first cause / kalam style argument could be structured to accept the claim of the mereological nihilist. As follows... 1. ...
August 20, 2021 at 00:37
As far as I understand it, the objection you are raising is one based off mereological nihilism - the view that there are no composite objects such as...
August 20, 2021 at 00:14
It depends on whether you view an atheist as someone who positively rejects the existence of any Gods. To me, I don't see atheism as simply a lack of ...
August 19, 2021 at 23:55
A good argument against brain in vat scenarios is the idea that the semantic content of our language (meaning of words) would make no sense if I was t...
August 19, 2021 at 23:41