You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Bob Ross

Comments

Trump is not a supporter of sex offenses. He definitely engages in immoral sex with prostitutes, but that’s not a sex offense—unless you are suggestin...
November 08, 2024 at 22:01
If there is no ‘objective’ morality, then your ethical theory isn’t really useful. It doesn’t matter if you believe that they are doing something wron...
November 08, 2024 at 21:50
I am open-minded: give me some examples of countries which are officially Islamic that have freedom of religion. I can't think of a single one that ac...
November 08, 2024 at 21:47
I don't really disagree with your post here: I think we have to be careful when using violence to impose values on other people...but I am saying it i...
November 08, 2024 at 15:07
But do they surpass Western culture in the areas that really matter? I don't think so. A representative republic, with liberties and freedoms, where e...
November 08, 2024 at 15:05
I am not following the critique here: a thing-in-itself represents something real—it represent “that”. It doesn’t represent nothing. Ok, I was misunde...
November 08, 2024 at 15:02
Actually, Europeans usually have pretty good countries: I don’t know why you roped them into it. All my examples have been in the middle east and in A...
November 08, 2024 at 14:55
The in-group is more important than the out-group. Each group has to protect its own viability first and foremost. E.g., if I can only save my mother ...
November 08, 2024 at 14:49
I don't think it frequently works historically. I am not denying that most of the historical examples are catastrophic failures; but the OP is pointin...
November 08, 2024 at 14:39
Ehhh, then I submit to you that you should be amoral: don’t meddle into matters of right or wrong behavior—because you don’t think there is such a thi...
November 08, 2024 at 14:36
It sounds like you don’t believe in personifying the State; and I would just briefly note that in a representative republic you have to—the government...
November 08, 2024 at 14:34
There’s nothing about a representative republic that prevents this; nor why would it? What do you mean by “aggressive”—that’s a very vague term here. ...
November 08, 2024 at 14:30
Historically, as far as I can tell, it usually was either internally induced or an external government exerted brutality on them to get them in line—t...
November 08, 2024 at 14:23
The nationalism I was advocating for can sometimes be at the detriment of the interests of other nations but it is NOT necessarily so: countries behav...
November 07, 2024 at 15:15
You are absolutely right to note, in practicality, the consequences matter. Of course you can. That’s how ethics is done. What you are arguing for is ...
November 07, 2024 at 15:08
Like what? The UN is a charade.
November 07, 2024 at 14:48
The US did not do anything remotely similar to what the Taliban is doing: am shocked you are trying to make that comparison. Perhaps I am misunderstan...
November 07, 2024 at 14:48
That’s an oddly good analogy. Ughhhh, cultural relativism—yet again. Nope. There are moral facts.
November 07, 2024 at 14:42
The reason I used those terms, is because it is true; and your terms do not accurately portray the point. For example, india doesn’t have just a probl...
November 07, 2024 at 14:41
I dream of a state of universal human flourishing; where each person, not just human, has equal, fundamental rights and liberties......or do you mean ...
November 07, 2024 at 14:38
Why is is inflammatory to say it with the proper words? This is yet another example of the effects of hyper-tolerance: we no longer can admit to ourse...
November 07, 2024 at 14:36
The UN is a joke: they don’t intervene in genocides because they lack the power to. The very countries which are doing genocide are members of the UN,...
November 07, 2024 at 14:31
Sort of. Kant was offering a solution, through the critique, between the rationalists (e.g., Wolf) and the empiricists (e.g., Hume): he sublated their...
November 07, 2024 at 14:24
What point are you making? I didn't follow. Cultural relativism and hyper-tolerance are nonsense.
November 07, 2024 at 01:44
That’s true, but despite the point. Really? If you could invade and conquer North Korea with no casualties nor with starting any other wars (with othe...
November 07, 2024 at 01:42
Correct, but that’s despite the point. I am saying that, in principle, you would have to reject the west invading the Nazis, or North Korea, or China,...
November 07, 2024 at 01:36
That’s your problem: you aren’t a moral realist. You didn’t answer the question; and provided, instead, a red herring. I will ask again but with more ...
November 07, 2024 at 01:32
I would like to hear your nuanced defense of the accusations I made to each of those three countries. I am open-minded; but I cannot envision such a d...
November 06, 2024 at 21:53
My OP is about Western values; not specifically the US. However, the US could wipe Mexico and Canada off the map—that’s not even a fair fight. You are...
November 06, 2024 at 21:51
This is a fair point; but don’t you think we have a duty to try? If I take your argument seriously, then we should stop the Nazis if they were to stay...
November 06, 2024 at 21:46
This must be a joke. China has concentration camps; harvests the organs of North Korean defectors for the black market; uses North Korean defector wom...
November 06, 2024 at 21:43
That’s literally the whole project of the CPR: you just denied the whole book here (: . Ok, now you are affirming the CPR (: . I wasn’t claiming that....
November 06, 2024 at 21:35
I could see that, insofar as it is fascistic: are you claiming that nationalism and fascism are the same?
November 06, 2024 at 21:32
Not at all. I am evaluating the justifiability of imperialism via a moral realist theory: I am not saying that every country should just take each oth...
November 06, 2024 at 21:31
So, if the Nazis would have stayed in Germany, then you think no one would be warranted in stopping them? I don’t think there’s a particularly good tr...
November 06, 2024 at 21:24
I can foresee, as a possibility, a nation which comes up with a better economic system than capitalism; and if that happens then, yes, they should imp...
November 06, 2024 at 18:37
That's partially fair; but I would note that imposing important and vital political systems is good. E.g., if you are against imperialism completely, ...
November 06, 2024 at 18:32
There’s essentially three theses: 1. The western supremacy thesis: western values are objectively better than many, if not all, non-western values whi...
November 06, 2024 at 18:29
Enforcing, similarly to how we do in the West, the idea of liberties, rights, and equal representation. As a side note, most of the time; the people w...
November 06, 2024 at 18:23
It doesn’t matter: I’ve read many different versions; and there is a consensus that Kant did use the term ‘noumena’ at least in a double-sense in some...
November 06, 2024 at 14:55
It is unpopular because by "animal" a philosopher tends to mean much more than what a scientist means by it. You are uncontroversially an animal in th...
November 05, 2024 at 19:36
It has all the editions in it, as far as I understand, and it is translated by J.M.D. Meiklejohn. I am not denying that. As I said, no one really know...
November 05, 2024 at 13:16
No they are not at all. The word “noumena” is used in a double-sense in the CPR, and Kant is very explicit about that. E.g.,: –– (CPR, p. 109) That’s ...
November 04, 2024 at 21:45
But, in terms of what we actually are, as opposed to what we appear to ourselves, we cannot say any of this is true…right? How can transcendental anal...
November 04, 2024 at 21:34
By senses, I just mean your faculties (or faculty) of sensibility; which is the power you have to be excited by things-in-themselves. Phenomenon, in t...
November 04, 2024 at 14:36
Very true. Very true. The only difference is that, I would say, cognitive science can't really get at the fundamental questions that Kant was trying t...
November 04, 2024 at 00:12
Two things needing to be mentioned here: 1. This “empirical” vs. “non-empirical” distinction you are making is NOT the same as my distinction between ...
November 03, 2024 at 15:45