You're subject to the guidelines like anyone else and your previous post was reprehensible the way you phrased it. The present one is mostly just very...
Mm, kind of. I'm more with @"unenlightened" on this. Which one, so many to choose from. :D I'm going to try a different tack if I continue anyway. It ...
Politicians, for example, when they say nothing can be done are effectively if not literally saying that to the victims. I feel some others who have c...
It's not nearly strong enough but that's an argument for doing that and more, not doing less. What I object to is people saying "let's do nothing". Th...
No what's pathetic is having gun massacre after gun massacre and refusing to solve the problem. Not only that but actively obfuscating the problem. Wh...
It doesn't matter because I didn't mention "assault rifles", I mentioned "assault weapons" as defined by the Feinstein attempt at helping to solve thi...
What sickens me the most is that anyone could effectively be saying to those families' victims, "He probably would have found a way to slaughter your ...
Sure, as I said, why bother with laws trying to stop people massacring others? Some of them might be rich and might be able to do it illegally anyway....
I can just see the gun advocates now scratching their heads trying to invent a scenario where he kills 59 people and injures 500 without having access...
Like a 20 year old in America can't buy a beer because that would be too dangerous! Just give the young folk military grade assault weapons instead. T...
He had high power weapons + a legal bump stock. He effectively had a machine gun and fired 90 rounds in ten seconds and he acquired everything legally...
Exactly, there's no point regulating weapons or drugs or anything really. If someone plans to do something bad they'll always find a way. Why bother t...
Well, congratulations on proving you are oppressed @"WISDOMfromPO-MO" on the basis of quoting one questionable law applicable to some US states. Good ...
Well, yes, if a third party can clearly understand a post I've written, that suggests it's understandable at least to someone of a reasonable level of...
So, bazookas for all it is. Viva, freedom. What's more like proof is your continued inability to understand basic analogies. But, fine, maybe Michael ...
Rubbish. I even PMed someone to check if I was clear. I was. Not being sure something would help is not a good reason not to do it especially when liv...
The specific argument now is about whether one problem (mass shootings) should not be dealt with because another might take its place (other mass murd...
So in Tiff and Thorongiland when a child molester openly working in a school molests a bunch of kids, those campaigning to ban them from schools will ...
What are you talking about? You completely missed the point. It's an analogy. It has to do with whether you deal with one problem (drunk driving / mas...
Have you people ever solved a problem before? First you identify the specific problem. You look at ways to solve it including evidence from third part...
That's a very strange comment. We're debating gun control after a mass shooting. So I'm talking about gun control as a means to reduce mass shootings....
More strawmanning. The fact is that drunk drivers are intent on driving under the influence of some drug. If it's not alcohol, they'll find something ...
Sometimes I feel I'm talking to chatbots in here, so I'll repeat: The problem of mass shootings (not evil, not mass murder, not dodgy cheeseburgers) h...
Fine Tiff, keep refusing to support anything that would actually solve the problem, but the relatives of future massacre victims won't be thanking you...
Comments